FWIW, I ran into this doing the Group D doc/literal interop tests for
pocketSOAP, and took exactly the same approach.
Cheers
Simon
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:12:03 -0600, in soap you wrote:
>According to XML Schema Primer 0 Chapter 2.5.1, a complexType can be
>derived from a simple type to add attr
uerle
>XML & Web Services Development
>512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
>
>
>
>
> Simon Fell
>
Hi,
Attempts to call the Axis interop server at
http://nagoya.apache.org:5049/axis/services/echo
result in this fault "Server.disabled : This Axis server is not
currently accepting requests."
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
I'm seeing failures on all the group D doc/lit tests currently
full wire dumps linked off
http://www.pocketsoap.com/weblog/soapInterop/r3/groupD.html
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
42.42
42
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:a="http://soapinterop.org/xsd";
xmlns:XS="http:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Simon Fell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:43 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Group D doc/lit tests
>>
>>
>> I'm seeing failures on all the group D doc/lit tes
Just to clarify, for section 5 encoded arrays, the name of the array
item element is irrelevant. Any Impl, that requires it to be a
particular name is broken.
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:04:46 -0600, in soap you wrote:
>Simon,
>
>Your schema is correct. WSDL2Java wil
t;512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
>
>
>
>
> Simon Fell
>
>
Hi,
I've just setup Axis Beta 1 on a fresh box, spotted a tweak needed to
the install doc
Step 5
log4j.jar is now log4j-core.jar
you also need to add the following to the classpath
commons-logging.jar
tt-bytecode.jar
Cheers
Simon
see http://xml.apache.org/overview.html
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:38:05 +0530 , in soap you wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>I have been asking this question for some time now but never got an answer.
>I want to participate in the development of AXIS.
>Could you guys tell me how do
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:55:45 +0100, in soap you wrote:
>Are you aware of any other vendors that use the "wrapped" style? Don't you
>think that using a part name (and the fact that there is only one) as a
>means of discriminating between "document" and "wrapped" is fairly delicate?
>I appreciate t
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:37:56 -0500 , in soap you wrote:
>>Are you aware of any other vendors that use the "wrapped" style? Don't you
>>think that using a part name (and the fact that there is only one) as a
>>means of discriminating between "document" and "wrapped" is fairly delicate?
>>I appreci
I'm testing SwA support in PocketSOAP against Axis beta 1 (with the
attachments sample), and am seeing a very strange problem. Everything
appears to work fine, unless the attachment is 344 or 345 bytes long,
in which case the server drops it, and it doesn't get echoed back (i
know this sounds biza
On Sat, 18 May 2002 08:25:49 -0700, in soap you wrote:
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Volanis, Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:51 AM
>Subject: RE: [BUG] Beta2 interop (was RE: Interoperability issue with
>MSVC++.Net)
>
>
>> >> Chris
On Sat, 18 May 2002 22:10:44 -0700, in soap you wrote:
>Simon, can you see from your server's access logs, what systems are running
>interop tests against it? do you see any from the new Sun 'reference
>implementation', for example?
>
>-steve
http://soap.4s4c.com/info/ua.aspx lists userAgents rec
On Sun, 19 May 2002 00:26:11 -0700, in soap you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Simon Fell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 11:58 PM
>Subject: Re: [BUG] Beta2 interop (was RE: Interoperability issue with
I'm doing some interop testing against the axis endpoint, and have
spotted a couple of issues.
1. no response [nothing, not even a single byte] for this request
POST http://nagoya.apache.org:5049/axis/servlet/AxisServlet HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8
User-Agent: PocketSOAP/1.3.02
On Wed, 22 May 2002 10:21:43 -0700, in soap you wrote:
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Russell Butek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 5:57 AM
>Subject: doc/lit and WS-I
>
>
>> WS-I is forming it's base profile as I write this note. They are
>>
Title: axis with tomcat 4.1.12 on OSX
Hi,
I'm trying to run Axis (I've tried both RC2, and the 1.0 release), under Tomcat 4.1.12 on Mac OSX (10.2.1). Trying to view the validate page results in the exception trace below. Trying to load the Administer Axis page results in a 404 "The requested
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:30:36 -0700, in soap you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Simon Fell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:02 AM
>Subject: axis with tomcat 4.1.12 on OSX
>
>
>> Hi,
>&
I posted this to soapbuilders and got no response, but the
soapbuilders interop tests endpoints for both Axis & SOAP are down,
and have been down for a while. Any plans to get them running again ?
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
I was writing a handler that looks at header values, and as far as i
can see SOAPHeader.getValue() always returns null. I couldn't see
anywhere where the de-serialized value of the header gets set into the
value field. I used getValueAsType() instead, which worked fine.
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketso
Attached is the server side impl for the Round 2B & 2C SOAPBuilders
interop tests. I was having lots of problems with deploy tools, so the
deploy.wsdd might not be correct [i hacked the changes into
server-config.xml by hand]. Using a PocketSOAP based client, Axis
handled everything fine with the
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002 20:23:17 -0500, in soap you wrote:
>It is kinda hard for me to test without a client. ;-)
>
>The code compiled and deployed OK for me. And this code didn't cause any
>of the unit or function tests to fail, so I'm inclined to commit it.
>
>One thing I would appreciate before
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 14:30:35 -0500, in soap you wrote:
>First, I've noticed that with Simon's implementation of Interop 2C tests,
>the generated WSDL does not seem to contain any entries. You
>can see the results at
>http://nagoya.apache.org:5049/axis/services/echo?wsdl .
I also noticed that f
URI's are not arbitrary strings.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
Cheers
Simon
www.pocketsoap.com
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:52:57 -0600, in soap you wrote:
>I'm still quite puzzled. How can URI's be relative when they can be
>arbitrary strings?!? Relativity implies rules to those strings and
25 matches
Mail list logo
