Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Antone F. Lawrence of Sao Miguel Azores

2018-01-21 Thread Cheri Mello
I didn't see an AntoniO, but an AntoniA. I think you sent the wrong link. I think both Cheryl Lawrence and Lillian Furtado Palko come from this family. Your mom's DNA matches Lillian. Your aunt doesn't. Neither match Cheryl Lawrence or her whole cluster. Ribeira das Tainhas is kinda different.

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Re: Ancestry

2018-01-21 Thread Cheri Mello
About FTDNA, sorry that's not true. If you want your tree private on FTDNA, you can mark it completely private. Here's a completely private tree from FTDNA: [image: Inline image 1] Here's the same tree, share with matches only but the living private: [image: Inline image 2] FTDNA does, indeed,

[AZORES-Genealogy] Re: Ancestry

2018-01-21 Thread M. Stringer
Greetings, Can't make any suggestions for any version of internet posting that is really private. Perhaps a modified version of your trees might be a consideration? I resisted posting any trees, anywhere -- until participating in this group. I used the FTDNA tree form to manually enter

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Ancestry

2018-01-21 Thread Cheryl Lawrence
But the records are already there. Any public record like birth, marriage, divorce, death and SS records are available to virtually anybody. On Jan 21, 2018 11:47 AM, "Tish M" wrote: > I agree with all of the others pertaining to this topic. Once you are in > the system

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Ancestry

2018-01-21 Thread Tish M
I agree with all of the others pertaining to this topic. Once you are in the system you have no rights. Your records become LDS records On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 6:46 AM, 'Lillian Palko' via Azores Genealogy < azores@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I don't recommend uploading a tree to Family Search. I

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Ancestry

2018-01-21 Thread 'Lillian Palko' via Azores Genealogy
I don't recommend uploading a tree to Family Search. I put mine there and other researchers are able to add to my tree without my permission. Yes, that is true. Then, just try to correct the mistakes. You can add a "discussion" and show your proof or lack of proof by second researcher, but my