Hello all-
I am attempting to use batman-adv in openwrt 8.09.1 on three Ubiquiti
NanoStation2. This is just a test environment. For now, my goal is
to have:
node 1:
eth0 - 10.0.0.1/24
ath0 - bat0 - 10.0.1.1/24
node 2:
eth0 - 10.0.0.2/24
ath0 - bat0 - 10.0.1.2/24
node 3:
eth0 - 10.0.0.3/24
I ran iwconfig and this shows bat0. So I did a little reading about ifconfig.
cat /proc/net/batman-adv/originators shows potential nexthops properly.
battool ping ... works.
I removed the batmand-adv package, and all is well. This must be the
userspace version.
In summary:
Install OpenWrt.
Some of my nodes cannot see each other... For example, node 1 can
battool ping node 2, but node 2 cannot battool ping node 1. All nodes
have the following:
With log_level = 11:
cat ath0 /proc/net/batman-adv/interfaces
produces:
Can't activate module: the primary interface is not active
The
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marek Lindnerlindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 01:19:51 Jacob Marble wrote:
Some of my nodes cannot see each other... For example, node 1 can
battool ping node 2, but node 2 cannot battool ping node 1.
That would be pretty strange
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marek Lindnerlindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
Also, it's tedious to deal with /proc/net/batman-adv/* It's cool in
hacky sort of way, but tedious. Is there any way that this could be
manipulated with a script? brctl is a nice interface, how about
bactl? bactl
Thank you, that worked.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Outback Dingooutbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
change the version in the batman-adv packages Makefile, and rebuild should
be all you need
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marek Lindnerlindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2009 23:21:18 Jacob Marble wrote:
batman-advanced needs a howto. I'm a pretty smart guy, but this took
me all week to figure out. I'm still shaky and my mesh network isn't
working very well yet. I
build_dir, make just deletes it, so I
leave this up to someone else (Marek?).
Jake
--
Jacob Marble
435 760 4321
jacobmar...@gmail.com
I have three nodes running OpenWrt r16484 (SVN) and batman-advanced
r1298. All nodes show each other in originators. batping gets host
unreachable for all relationships, and the host unreachable messages
come very quickly, maybe 1000/second. Here is a log sample, log_level
4. log_level 11
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Jacob Marblejacobmar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have three nodes running OpenWrt r16484 (SVN) and batman-advanced
r1298. All nodes show each other in originators. batping gets host
unreachable for all relationships, and the host unreachable messages
come very
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Marek Lindnerlindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Friday 19 June 2009 02:42:54 Jacob Marble wrote:
When I opkg remove kmod-batman-adv-kernelland, the kernel module
stays loaded, so when I opkg install kmod-batman-adv-[newer version]
the old module stays loaded
Two Linux boxes, each plugged in via Ethernet to a BATMAN node (two
nodes). The nodes talk batman-advanced to each other via WiFi. The
Linux boxes can ping each other all day long. Both Linux boxes have
Apache running. Downloading a file via HTTP works only if the file is
smaller than or equal
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Sven Eckelmannsven.eckelm...@gmx.de wrote:
On Saturday 20 June 2009 00:17:23 Jacob Marble wrote:
Two Linux boxes, each plugged in via Ethernet to a BATMAN node (two
nodes). The nodes talk batman-advanced to each other via WiFi. The
Linux boxes can ping each
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Sven Eckelmannsven.eckelm...@gmx.de wrote:
On Monday 22 June 2009 22:31:57 Outback Dingo wrote:
when you say dont go thru, what exactly are they not passing through, which
interface or meaning thru the DSL / internet link, we need to try to
detmine also the
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Jacob Marblejacobmar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Sven Eckelmannsven.eckelm...@gmx.de wrote:
On Monday 22 June 2009 22:31:57 Outback Dingo wrote:
when you say dont go thru, what exactly are they not passing through, which
interface or
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sven Eckelmannsven.eckelm...@gmx.de wrote:
Ok, setting mtu of ath0's to 1524 and of bat0 to 1500 should help here. Just
for the sake of completeness: Is there bridging involved in the workstations
or any icmp filtering on the workstations/nanostations?
This is
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Sven Eckelmannsven.eckelm...@gmx.de wrote:
On Monday 22 June 2009 22:48:21 Jacob Marble wrote:
OK, what if I set the MTU of ath0 higher? Lemme see.
You must also set the mtu of the bat0 higher (to 1500 to be more exact) when
you set the ath0 mtu to 1524
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 00:01:46 Andrew Lunn wrote:
The steps as i see it:
1) Make a decision about which list server to use.
I think as soon as we havea short list of options we can make the decision. At
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Jacob Marble jacobmar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 00:01:46 Andrew Lunn wrote:
The steps as i see it:
1) Make a decision about which list server to use.
I
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
a) has experience hosting, and so can filter spam without hassle
b) lets us use open-mesh.net instead of super-duper-mailing-host.com
c) hosts open source gratis
a and b are must have, c would be nice.
I started going down
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Jacob Marble jacobmar...@gmail.com wrote:
a) has experience hosting, and so can filter spam without hassle
b) lets us use open-mesh.net instead of super-duper-mailing-host.com
c) hosts open source gratis
a and b are must have, c would be nice.
EMWD (http
I think that having two lists would be a hassle and a mistake. To
have two lists at one host might work, but one list at VGER and
another somewhere else could be counter-productive, as internal
communication would be constantly forwarded to the kernel list, and
relevant kernel traffic would
22 matches
Mail list logo
