On 18/11/2007, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Givem the original is at 25fps, why not encode at that in fact?
50fps. ;-) (Pedantic, but important...)
If you are going to be pedantic, at least be right! UKTV (and all in
Europe) is 25 frames a second
I
Barry.
The PRS and MCPS are legally responsible in the UK, see:
http://www.mcps-prs-alliance.co.uk/playingbroadcastingonline/Pages/default.aspx
On 18/11/2007, Barry Carlyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
Whilst working at my local student bar/restaurant, I was listening to
*I had been surfing the backstage website for a while. I was not able to =
find information on how to syndicate full text content. I was able to =
see a page with list of RSS feeds and they all provide only headlines =
and not full text.
*
Only the summary text is syndicated
*Kindly let me know
Martin Deutsch wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 11:43 PM, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Givem the original is at 25fps, why not encode at that in fact?
50fps. ;-) (Pedantic, but important...)
Surely that just depends on
On 11/19/07, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha :D
Anyway, the cameras they were using had the holographic BBC HD logo
plastered along the side of them, so things are looking up - unless they're
just old skool SD cameras with a chavlike shopping list down the side of
them! I
Christopher Woods wrote:
Anyway, the cameras
they were using had the holographic BBC HD logo plastered along the
side of them, so things are looking up - unless they're just old skool
SD cameras with a chavlike shopping list down the side of them! I wonder
if the N24 cameras are similarly
Hi,
I am finding hard on the readability aspect on that site
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk http://backstage.bbc.co.uk .
Am finding bit difficult on what I can do with the backstage service.
Hence the email.
Thanks,
Imran Sheriff
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OFCOM don't regulate the podcast itself because they don't regulate the
internet - only the original radio programme
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Cashmore
Sent: 18 November 2007 23:08
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk;
Brian Butterworth wrote:
If you are going to be pedantic, at least be right! UKTV (and all in
Europe) is 25 frames a second
I suspect yuou don't understand what interlaced means.
I think I detect an impending semantic argument, so let me try and avoid
it. You're (I think) defining a frame
:-)
-- Forwarded message --From: Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL
PROTECTED]Date: 19 Nov 2007 11:26Subject: [Fsfe-uk] Interview: Ashley
Highfield on BBC's DRM'd iPlayerTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a good interview on Groklaw with the head of the BBC
divisionresponsible for the DRM'd
Also you can comment here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2007/11/groklaw_interview.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crossland
Sent: 19 November 2007 12:19
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: [backstage] Fwd:
On 19/11/2007, Nick Reynolds-AMi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also you can
comment here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2007/11/groklaw_interview.html
Good point :-)
Ashley said, Well, they started from the principle of, We just don'tknow the
way this market is going to develop. We don't
Somebody has kindly corrected me off-list with regards to the 'trial' of
podcasts
the iplayer PVT gave us regulatory permission to do non drm audio downloads in
April
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matthew Cashmore
Sent: Sun 11/18/2007 23:08
To:
On 19/11/2007, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody has kindly corrected me off-list with regards to the 'trial' of
podcasts
the iplayer PVT gave us regulatory permission to do non drm audio downloads
in April
Awesome - now we just need the BBC to do non-patent encumbered
davehaveyouanyideahowdifficultitistoreadyouremailstheylookquiteinterestingbutthelackofformattingandgeneralrunningtogetherrreallymakeslifedifficultforsomeofusonthelistDavid
Dave Crossland wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Nick Reynolds-AMi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also you can
comment here:
Hi Imran - I know a few people have replied off list with suggestions - but I
wanted to reply to you here because I believe the information may be useful to
others.
The backstage site / project aims to help developers get access to the BBC's
data and content - our moto is 'use our stuff to
On 19/11/2007, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Imran - I know a few people have replied off list with suggestions - but I
wanted to reply to you here because I believe the information may be useful
to others.
The backstage site / project aims to help developers get access to
On 19/11/2007, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
avehaveyouanyideahowdifficultitistoreadyouremailsthey
lookquiteinterestingbutthelackofformattingandgeneral
runningtogetherrreallymakeslifedifficultforsomeofuson
thelistDavid
lol, I do apologise and hope this is better (CAPS EMPHASIS mine)
Steve,
I was working from the assumption about the ~30fps comment that this was
about frames not fields. All SD UK TV is interlaced, with the exeption of
telecinied content.
NTSC content runs at 29.97fps, to stop strobing effects on the screen when
near lightbulbs on the US 30Hz mains.
On
On Monday 19 November 2007 14:58, Dave Crossland wrote:
GOODS THAT HAVE NO COST
OF MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTION
Television programmes have zero cost? Crikey, I didn't realise people were
so civil spirited. Incidentally, where can I get zero cost internet
connectivity with unlimited upload
On 19/11/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
If the BBC podcasts are first prepared as PCM-encoded WAV files before being
translated to the site, providing OggVobis version shouldn't be a problem,
surely?
The technical problems around providing OggVorbis version are the
Matt,
Good afternoon.
I posted a suggestion about doing backstage stuff for the upcoming Freesat
project, presumably using MHEG5.
I quite like the idea of using the opportunistic data facility - bandwidth
that becomes usable in a lumpy way due to the way MPEG2/MPEG4 works. If
the picture
please, get me off your spamlist!!!
Mr. Baker
_
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Brian Butterworth
Verzonden: maandag 19 november 2007 15:53
Aan: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Onderwerp: [backstage] Freesat - oppotunistic data for podcasts
Matt,
Good
Hi All,
Not sure if you'd see this, but some of you might be interested
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/
Here at FMT AM, we've got our own departmental Blog where we write
about the stuff we're working on, both for public release (betas etc)
and as internal RnD projects.
The big
On 19/11/2007, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome - now we just need the BBC to do non-patent encumbered audio
What? Software became patentable in the UK, damn I missed that one.
Vorbis would be nice though, but MP3 is certainly better than the
BBC's other favorite formats.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:30:46PM +, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
If the BBC podcasts are first prepared as PCM-encoded WAV files before being
translated to the site, providing OggVobis version shouldn't be a problem,
surely?
I'm also trying to get one of our team to post something on Radio Labs about
the new music podcasts - what we're allowed to do and why we can now do it.
Keep an eye out...
Tristan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Simon Cross
Sent: Mon 11/19/2007 5:09 PM
To:
On 19/11/2007, Andy Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:30:46PM +, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
If the BBC podcasts are first prepared as PCM-encoded WAV files before
being
translated to the
On 19/11/2007, Michael Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2007 14:58, Dave Crossland wrote:
GOODS THAT HAVE NO COST
OF MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTION
Television programmes have zero cost? Crikey, I didn't realise people were
so civil spirited. Incidentally, where can I
Sorry, I forgot the diagram...
On 19/11/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Michael Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2007 14:58, Dave Crossland wrote:
GOODS THAT HAVE NO COST
OF MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTION
Television programmes
On 19/11/2007, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome - now we just need the BBC to do non-patent encumbered audio
What? Software became patentable in the UK, damn I missed that one.
Software idea patents in some countries harm users of
On Monday 19 November 2007 17:31:26 Andy wrote:
What? Software became patentable in the UK, damn I missed that one.
Yes, software gets patented in Europe, including the UK, and has been for
many years. For software to be patentable it generally has to sit inside a
system and affect something
On 19/11/2007, Michael Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2007 17:31:26 Andy wrote:
What? Software became patentable in the UK, damn I missed that one.
Yes, software gets patented in Europe, including the UK, and has been for
many years. For software to be patentable it
List needs moar Olinda info!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Ferne
Sent: 19 November 2007 18:15
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Radio Labs plug
I'm also trying to get one of our team to post
You see, I just somehow knew that giving away content including music
for free, forever, at the point of delivery, to anyone, regardless of
whether they had paid their Licence Fee or lived in the UK, *still*
wasn't going to be good enough for some.
[throws up hands in despair and backs way from
On 19/11/2007, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You see, I just somehow knew that giving away content including music
for free, forever, at the point of delivery, to anyone, regardless of
whether they had paid their Licence Fee or lived in the UK, *still*
wasn't going to be good enough
On 19/11/2007, Michael Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2007 20:13:27 Dave Crossland wrote:
Yes, its important to avoid the confusing term intellectual property
and consider the laws that are grouped in that term on their own,
since their purposes and details are
currently as of right now the programme catalogue is not covered by the
backstage licence.
We have been pushing hard to get this back under the licence but right now it
sits just outside our reach.
Sorry people
Ian Forrester
This e-mail is: [x] private; [] ask first; [] bloggable
Senior
On 19/11/2007, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You see, I just somehow knew that giving away content including music
for free, forever, at the point of delivery, to anyone, regardless of
whether they had paid their Licence Fee or lived in the UK, *still*
wasn't going to be good enough
On Nov 19, 2007 10:08 PM, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You see, I just somehow knew that giving away content including music
for free, forever, at the point of delivery, to anyone, regardless of
whether they had paid their
40 matches
Mail list logo
