Mo McRoberts wrote:
Without the Canvas UX, you're not permitted to access any Canvas content.
4.62.
Further, the Trust understood that, since the core technical
specification for Canvas would be published, it would be open to
manufacturers and platform operators either to adopt the
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:56, David Tomlinson
d.tomlin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Without the Canvas UX, you're not permitted to access any Canvas content.
That is, you can run a completely separate system based on the Canvas
specs, but unless you implement the Canvas UX, you can't access the
Yeah, but would that include the Mythtv project and other open source projects?
Would the Linux community be able to build their own gear? And have access to
everything?
For instance, will there be scope for, say, a Canvas pvr to save out to a NAS
frame on the local network?
I don't
Alex Cockell wrote:
Yeah, but would that include the Mythtv project and other open source
projects? Would the Linux community be able to build their own gear? And
have access to everything?
Yes. you might even get access to the Canvas UI if you request it.
It is a legal obligation for the
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:03, David Tomlinson
d.tomlin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
It is a legal obligation for the BBC (and other public service broadcasters)
to make it's services available to the public and act in a
non-discriminatory way to all third parties (in my view).
^
In *your*
Mo McRoberts wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:03, David Tomlinson
d.tomlin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
It is a legal obligation for the BBC (and other public service broadcasters)
to make it's services available to the public and act in a
non-discriminatory way to all third parties (in my view).
David Tomlinson wrote:
The costs of publishing a specification (as a text document or pdf) on a
web site are low, comparable with the costs associated with handling
individual complaints, about discrimination and lack of access.
Earlier there was mention made of a 'cost recovery'.
The
Ian Stirling wrote:
Earlier there was mention made of a 'cost recovery'.
Cost recovery does not apply to distribution through the DTG.
It would appear to be perverse to apply any cost recovery to a document
distributed to the public over the internet.
Development cost estimate: Twenty
Alex Cockell wrote:
As long as the possibility of an open-source implementation remains.
Which is quite concerning at present. One should be able to build a
Canvas receiver from *public* specs ultimately. The scale of lockdown is
quigte worrying at the mo.
Also inprove some of the
Does anyone else see this as the BBC effectively
bailing out other broadcasters
by providing a common platform backed with licence fee
funded content and development?
No, this is what I'd expect the BBC to do.
It serves the public when market-based squabbles over
alternative
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:24, Frank Wales fr...@limov.com wrote:
Kieran Kunhya wrote:
Does anyone else see this as the BBC effectively bailing out other
broadcasters
by providing a common platform backed with licence fee funded content and
development?
No, this is what I'd expect the BBC
- Original message -
Kieran Kunhya wrote:
No, this is what I'd expect the BBC to do.
It serves the public when market-based squabbles over alternative
technological platforms don't happen, and everyone just gets on with
innovating atop a good-enough platform, rather than frittering
Hi all
I am running a community and event series called MiniBar in London
(Ian F. came quite often when he was still based in London).
Its a community for tech entrepreneurs and developers. We are meeting
once a month in the Truman Brewery with around 300 of us.
I am hoping to one of our
Following on from discussion last september:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jun/25/project-canvas-bbc-trust
--
Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once...
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit
Does anyone else see this as the BBC effectively bailing out other
broadcasters by providing a common platform backed with licence fee funded
content and development?
It's unlikely such a wide group of companies would ever reach a consensus
otherwise without the BBC. Anything similar would
On 27/06/2010 20:53, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
Does anyone else see this as the BBC effectively bailing out other
broadcasters by providing a common platform backed with licence fee funded
content and development?
It's unlikely such a wide group of companies would ever reach a consensus
16 matches
Mail list logo
