2008/5/6 ST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Kontiki may be inferior in technological terms, but would be vastly superior
> in terms of a Media Lawyer never having seen its name associated with
> intellectual property theft.
There is no such thing as intellectual property theft, and that
phrase is so con
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/08/bbc.television2
*He also sounded a warning for BBC executives, accusing them of "incredible
naivety" in believing they could control the distribution of programmes
online. *
*Programmes distributed via the BBC's increasingly popular online iPlayer
servi
It's rather interesting that one of the very few TV personalities who
really *gets* the digital revolution (tm) and all that is essentially
arguing that the digital arms race needs to be beefed up, instead of
starting negotations.
My personal opinion, not those of my employers etc.
Andrew
___
unhelpfully, the BBC's not yet put up the transcript of the speech, so
it's hard to judge given the vagries of reporting...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/thefuture/
2008/5/8 Andrew Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Can I just pedal backwards very quickly as I realise that in reading the
> article, Mr. Fry a
Can I just pedal backwards very quickly as I realise that in reading the
article, Mr. Fry actually said no such thing... he just pointed out that
the lock wasn't particularly secure. Which is not news to anyone...
*pedals backwards rapidly*
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Good example of how the world looks *very* different if you're a
rights holder currently making money from your secondary rights...
even a rights holder as clued up as Fry
2008/5/8 Andrew Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> It's rather interesting that one of the very few TV personalities who really
>
Didn't think of it like that, good points
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tom Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good example of how the world looks *very* different if you're a
> rights holder currently making money from your secondary rights...
> even a rights holder as clued up as Fry
>
All the boxes have ethernet ports, and my colleagues at BBC Research and
Innovation have done some nice proof-of-concept trials of MHEG
applications picking up text content distributed via the internet - for
example, sourcing news stories off bbc.co.uk/news, putting twitter
updates on screen and do
Andrew,
There was a demo of a system using MHEG5 and the Creative Archive that we
were shown at the MGEIT(un)F last year.
Shouldn't be a problem to do a Flash video player now the format has been
'opened'.
My first app for that system would be a Podcast player...
I've got a Humax Foxsat-HD, an
Yep - the BBC Archive Trial was an interesting project, and proves much
of the technicalities and that, along with another trial called BBC+ did
feed into the Freesat specifications. The Archive Trial used Netgem
iPlayer DTT boxes which also have ethernet ports and a number were given
to people to
I agree with Mr Fry's position and furthermore, I think that it
is important, as is my own case, to understand that there are many
rights-holders who fear all of this. and the result is that they
cannot see a high quality/secure way to release their work for
financial reward. Theref
2008/5/8 Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yep - the BBC Archive Trial was an interesting project, and proves much
> of the technicalities and that, along with another trial called BBC+ did
> feed into the Freesat specifications. The Archive Trial used Netgem iPlayer
> DTT boxes which also ha
the transcript and audio have just been uploaded.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/thefuture/transcript_fry.shtml
video goes out on bbc parliament and then iplayer after that on sat 9pm.
fry's point about downloading iPlayer files is actually a sideshow to (another)
lengthy spirited defence of the licence f
They'll need a few more before the ethernet port does everything we need
of them :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Sent: 08 May 2008 13:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re:
I think the point is that no technical copy inhibiting scheme will
ever "work"; the best ones will only discourage casual users but time
and time again we see that such solutions merely penalize most users.
Unscrupulous vendors or integrators will assert that "protection" is
available to worried ri
2008/5/8 Richard P Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree with Mr Fry's position and furthermore, I think that it is
> important, as is my own case, to understand that there are many
> rights-holders who fear all of this. and the result is that they cannot
> see a high quality/secure way t
http://www.contentinople.com/author.asp?section_id=450&doc_id=152567
So Verisign is spinning off Kontiki?
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-ar
They need a few more before the do a few things! Currently you enter a
postcode and then get 'London' anyway...
2008/5/8 Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> They'll need a few more before the ethernet port does everything we need
> of them :)
>
> --
> *From:* [EMAI
Jeremy Stone wrote:
the transcript and audio have just been uploaded.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/thefuture/transcript_fry.shtml
wot, no mp3? ;)
Phil
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Un
don't shoot the messenger!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Wilson
Sent: Thu 5/8/2008 3:56 PM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Stephen Fry: "There is this marvellous idea the
iPlayer is secure. It's anything but secure"
Jeremy Stone wro
Jeremy Stone wrote:
don't shoot the messenger!
I initially thought of signing off as Phil 'never satisfied' Wilson, but couldn't bear the
thought of causing so much nationwide tittering.
Oh, wait...
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://ba
On 5/8/08, Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately this was all done with what we term "reference recievers" -
> basically Linux based PCs which pretend to be set top boxes. The actual
> software in the Freesat set top boxes to handle text stuff is unlikely to be
> fully funct
Out of interest, does anyone know if any of the Freesat receivers are Linux
based?
Given their ethernet socket, in-the-field software upgrade facility to
enable or add features, plus some cool translucency effects on the EPG and
N&N banner (from the digitalspy screenies of the Humax HD recei
23 matches
Mail list logo