offered to do that.
I don't seem to recall that ever happening with the wreckage from any other
technology war...
Mind you, this really is the wrong place to ask that question - why don't you
mail them and ask? (they are a commercial entity run seperately from the
rest of the BBC after
mean that they don't think
about the ethical aspects of their work.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
t allows for multiple
reimplementations. (the simplest way of course there to be to define an open
definition for access to said service which can then evolve into and open
standard)
Dogmatically going around *judging* other people's views on a very simplist
narrow view of freedom smacks to m
them in the trash.
Despite using usenet for over 15 years, and having been on numerous
mailing lists and fora I've only ever "plonked" one person. (though not
publically, I see little point in making a statement out of it). I don't think
Dave's reached that stage
On Thursday 28 February 2008 15:58:08 Dave Crossland wrote:
> > Even if I choose to use a proprietary program on a open source operating
> > system. Sorry, I'm not wrong,
>
> Sorry, you agree not to share with me, which is wrong.
*plonk*
Michael.
-
Sent via
s an interesting technology. From what
I've heard from others though they seem to like it. I'd also be interested in
hearing people's opinions of using & developing for it.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://b
ff. If
people choose to only read one link out of these, I'd suggest reading the
MASCOT one :-)
Regards,
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
feel that's
measurable and testable as right or wrong based on past experience. Could
that be an alternative reason to look at Gnash? Dunno - depends on how
large this specific risk is.
I can see other issues with Gnash as well, which I don't feel relevant
here, but this change probably
, creating a plugin to mozilla to mask as the iPhone for the
purposes of interoperability with the BBC website would almost certainly
be legal)
There are direct parallels here with the BitKeeper debacle (where the heinous
haxxor tool was known as "telnet").
Michael.
-
Sent via th
then
> the ITV logos started appearing on the screen.
Oh dear.
It still seems to be showing ITV1 at the moment... (or "3" as we called it
when I was a wee kiddie)
Michael.
(no idea who to tell...)
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visi
sible - in the past. Indeed, for Digital Radio Mondiale
(the other DRM :), it can be fairly common).
Michael.
(personal opinions only. other opinions are available)
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mail
multicore systems natively (ie
use all the CPUs) with very light touch changes to top level code. (this is a
bit experimental :)
Have fun!
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Snr Research Engineer, BBC Future Media Research & Innovation,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kamaelia Project Lead, http://kamaelia
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 13:43:02 Michael wrote:
> This just a short note to say that BBC Research has been accepted as a
> mentor organisation for Google Summer of Code again this year (third
> year!). Also Dirac applied seperately along with the Schroedinger project
> and as a
Tried so hard it was unfunny. But then
humour is incredibly subjective.
Michael.
(goes back to watching his DVDs of Heidi)
:-)
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list
ourceforge.net/Cookbook/SimpleBitTorrentExample
(contributed by a nice chap who was distributing content over a rendering/
post-production farm :)
The biggest barrier to online distribution has always been rights IMO. There
are many others, but rights is the hardest to deal with...
Michael.
gh to frameworks like django & pylons), which is
pretty cool IMO. Interestingly it looks like they're providing sandboxing,
which I'm guessing uses the facilities from pypy, but that's a pure guess.
Anyone got any experiences they wish to share?
Michael.
--
http://
ast ... :)
That said, it still doesn't help with the problem David mentions above.
Regards,
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
since it's a really, really, good idea, but it's just worth remembering we're
looking at outlying values regarding a non-HTTP protocol.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:43:50 Brian Butterworth wrote:
> On 12/04/2008, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 April 2008 05:57:49 Brian Butterworth wrote:
> > > If it were all doing using HTTP it would be easily cached, of course,
...
> > Ignores
On Monday 14 April 2008 10:25:52 Ivan Pope wrote:
> The move was reported in this morning's Financial Times and is expected to
> be confirmed by the BBC today.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/bbcworldwide/worldwidestories/pressreleases/2008/04_april/ashley_highfield_kangaroo.shtm
Sean,
I think we'll have to agree to disagree. I'd rather post-judge (if at all)
rather than pre-judge.
I did write a longer reply, but I don't see the point sending it.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://back
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 16:14:03 Steve Jolly wrote:
> Michael Sparks wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 14:32, Mr I Forrester wrote:
> >> Although we laugh about this stuff, Google's policy on free food is
> >> actually well reasoned. But I don'
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 15:15:41 Gareth Davis wrote:
> Michael Sparks wrote:
> > I've got a kettle up here and tea bags and coffee you know. :-)
>
> Show off!
>
> I hope it's passed a safety test, or facilities will be on to you now :)
It has been properly PA
On Thursday 17 April 2008 05:09:20 Brian Butterworth wrote:
> ADML (Attention Deficit Mark-up Language) is an XML-based format
> for capturing a person's madness and insomnia.
+1
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
t you put a small linux on the flash
> stick and get going from there?
>
> KIS KIT GSOH lol
http://www.supergrubdisk.org/ on a USB stick is your friend.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 14:14:02 Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 March 2008 13:43:02 Michael wrote:
> > This just a short note to say that BBC Research has been accepted as a
> > mentor organisation for Google Summer of Code again this year (third
> > year!). Also Dirac app
und something they have *zero* (or next to zero)
interest in?
Whilst TV matters to a lot of people (including me :-) it is however *just*
TV.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_lis
a television channel.
If you're going to attack me, when asked to justify your (bizarre) idea I'm
not playing. Goodbye.
Michael
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
have something valuable to contribute, twist their arms to tell us about
it! Please also forward this Call for Papers to anyone that you feel may be
interested.
For more information about PyCon UK 2008, please visit our homepage at
http://www.pyconuk.org/
Regards,
Michael.
--
[ In my own tim
BBC Staff are not able to enter the competition"
Awww. (not the least bit surprised :-) )
Mind you, we're planning a beta release for that weekend of the next release
of Kamaelia, so I'd be busy enough as it is :-)
Michael.
--
Kamaelia Project Lead/Project dust pup
On Friday 13 June 2008 12:05:05 Matthew Cashmore wrote:
> I'm seriously just considering dressing up.
You want to do the monster mash?
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_l
te for Mashed. Personally I'm planning on using it to write a modern
version of speak and spell using it based on handwriting recognition and
speech synthesis -- if I get a chance :)
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.
On Thursday 19 June 2008 12:41:38 Alia Sheikh wrote:
> so we're currently flapping a bit sorting that
> out...
Are you really /flapping/ ?
:)
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archi
meone. :-) (had some good feedback at mashed & post-mashed)
The new packaging, release and "landing page" was welcomed :)
Have fun :)
Michael
--
Michael Sparks, Snr Research Engineer, BBC Future Media Research & Innovation,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], New Broadcasting House, BBC Manches
On Thursday 03 July 2008 21:46:16 Richard Lockwood wrote:
..
> > But it tramples our freedom and community, which are more important.
>
> No Dave, you're thinking of Godzilla.
+1 QOTW
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, p
n which case we probably couldn't... (cf competition rules in
even things like Doctor Who Adventures magazine :-)
That said, any competition is better than none - after all, its the taking
part and having fun that matters... :-)
Regards,
Michael.
(all personal thoughts)
-
Sent via the ba
views on freedom are "wrong". I don't expect it back, so I took
Dave's suggestion of "deploying filters".
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
On Friday 04 July 2008 15:50:29 Adam Hatia wrote:
> I wish I could be excluded from this banal tit-for-tat kids game!
There's the backstage-developer mailing list as well, for what it's worth.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, pleas
with introductions :)
(I'm being a bit fast an loose with my analogy there :)
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com
equirement for hardware accelleration. Not a huge surprise
really.
[1] http://www.virtualbox.com/
Pity really given video playback (eg iplayer) works fine in virtualbox.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc
On Thursday 10 July 2008 20:35:50 Arkham.p77 wrote:
> Michael, FWIW
>
> that virtualbox link should be .ORG
> as the .com is squatted :)
Oops, sorry. My bad.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/arch
On Thursday 10 July 2008 22:31:55 Barry Carlyon wrote:
> May seem a silly question but it doesn't say on the website.
> Do you have to pay for tickets?
Nope - normally organisers of barcamps/etc find generous and gracious
sponsors to help cover the basic costs of running them.
Mich
welcome.
Please do forward this to whomever you think would be interested!
Michael
(on behalf of the Pycon UK committee (nothing to do with the day job :-) )
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailin
ent
> XBMC. But has a simpler interface and could be pushed to a mainstream
> audience. Its Mac and Ubuntu only right now and doesn't support live TV
> through a tuner card just like xbmc, but who cares when everything's going
> ip right?
I could't find a download link - what le
le of cartoons/drawing)
The use of a comic to introduce the features reminds me of the cartoon guide
to computer science (by Larry Gonick).
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 00:19:38 Ian Forrester wrote:
> Would love to be there but I'm in London on the 16th.
>
> Anyone else going to go?
Sadly it's not practical for me to go either, though for other reasons :)
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk di
ink the first is a better presentation than the second, but
then I've had more experience explaining the contents of the first than the
second. (Got some great feedback in the q&a though and will feed it into any
later re-explanation, and redo the slides accordingly :)
Hoping someone f
nds, will be a shift of
developers to the Gphone - a bit like what happened when the BBC bought
H2G2, coinciding with wikipedia being founded...
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.
ds or so. Unlike current multitouch things,
its vision is far further than what we have today. (through including things
like projection onto a real desk and scanning in things on the desk as a
result)
(ever since seeing this, I've only ever gotten desks with white surfaces, to
leave opti
Without that, such a stamp would
be trivial to remove. The creation of a perfect (and completely general)
DRM scheme is an exercise for the reader.
It is perhaps easier to prove that such a perfect and completely general
DRM scheme is unworkable where end users have access to a universal
copying and p
bbcinternet/2008/10/mobile_drm.html
>
> drm isn't going to go away - but we are doing our best!
For people who haven't seen this, today's xkcd seems serendipitous:
* http://xkcd.com/488/
(not commenting on content beyond being serendipitous :-)
Michael.
-
Sent via the b
On Thursday 16 October 2008 11:31:56 Andrew Bowden wrote:
> You are a Channel 4 shareholder. In essence. Channel 4 is a publicly
> owned corporation, and as such, is owned by the population of the UK.
Isn't the government's stake 51% or something?
Michael.
--
http://www.k
On Thursday 16 October 2008 14:21:18 Andrew Bowden wrote:
> Nope. It's fully public - the Channel 4 Television Corporation officially.
Ahh, maybe I'm thinking of a discussion in 2004 where it mooted having a share
release then, leaving it at 51%. Obviously that never happen
Mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia
New website: http://www.kamaelia.org/Home
Reference: http://www.kamaelia.org/Components
Cookbook: http://www.kamaelia.org/Cookbook
(for those missing the relevance, this is a project from BBC Research :)
Regards,
Michael.
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 16:18:17 Richard Lockwood wrote:
> So where's your problem? It's published, it's in the public domain.
I personally think this is rather tasteless.
Privacy matters.
Michael
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,
doesn't get bombarded repeatedly by other helpful people
on this list :-)
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior Research Engineer, BBC Research
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kamaelia Project Lead,
http://www.kamaelia.org/GetKamaelia
BBC Manchester
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.
ow effective that affect is. After all,
DVDs seem to be doing OK, and one of the more amusing aspects about
that is that some people prefer DVD because "it doesn't have any DRM".
Michael.
--
http://yeoldeclue.com/blog
http://www.kamaelia.org/Home
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co
free, since some people *think* they
already are (since it doesn't impede their actions).
As for the rest you've decided to lecture me, and I've decided to delete it,
since I don't see the relevance to me.
Have fun :)
Michael.
--
http://yeoldeclue.com/blog
http://www.kamael
On Sunday 23 November 2008 22:07:20 Michael wrote:
> You obviously can't read.
This should read as "can't read what I meant". Sorry for how that comes across
otherwise.
I'll step away from email for a while methinks until I start typing sentences
with all the wo
this Mac running flash 8
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer
asta la vista DRM debate
- does it work with gnash, i wonder?
"""
See also:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/msg06982.html
Michael
--
http://yeoldeclue.com/blog
http://www.kamaelia.org/Home
-
Sent
simply do not, and should not have to, care
about, ever.
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
is sort of thing could be extended. (Oh, if anyone
*does* by the way, I'd be happy to include the extensions in Kamaelia,
obviously :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
http://yeoldeclue.com/blog
http://www.kamaelia.org/GetKamaelia
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubsc
chool. If a tool undermines the
teaching then it moves from a force for good into a force for bad. This goes
as much for proprietary systems as it does for open systems.
ie the reasons for change should be pedagogical rather than political.
Michael.
--
(personal views only)
-
Sent via the bac
server)
On 15/12/05, Michael Pritchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just beat me to it, although my system for now and next is more convulted (although you can choose from all the bleb.org
channels with my module).Generate a selection of channels @
http://tv.blueghost.co.uk/nn.php using the goog
via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-- --Michael PritchardWeb :: http://www.blueghost.co.ukGMail::
[EMAIL PROTECTED]--
Also,the tar.gz file used to store the files as follows:/todaysdate/file.xml , eg /20060426/20060425BBCOne_pl.xmlit is now/file.xml , eg /20060425BBCOne_pl.xml
On 08/05/06, Andrew McParland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Michael,Good idea. I've put the XML Schema (and the XML Cla
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>-Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html
. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/-- --
Michael PritchardWeb :: http://www.blueghost.co.ukGMail:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]--
appoint or AFD locally for UK places.thats probably because the google geocoder doesn't work in the UK yet :)-- ------
Michael PritchardWeb :: http://www.blueghost.co.ukGMail:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]--
The feeds and APIs page seems to be broke again ( i think it was broke ages ago) :http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/data/Data-- --
Michael PritchardWeb :: http://www.blueghost.co.ukGMail:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]--
Hello,
I noticed the idea on backstage.bbc.co.uk for iCal publishing of the 7day
TV/radio feed, so I did a quick prototype. Please check it out, iCals
available here:
http://mike260.dyndns.org/~mikef/bbc_ical/
It's only tested with iCal, and likely broken for other apps.
The server will come and
On 16/10/06 23:08, "Duncan Barclay" wrote:
> Interesting, and looks like it could potentially be useful. The next
> thing I would do is go on to have customised listings so that you don't
> see all the shows that you aren't interested in, although that could be
> potentially hard to implement dep
also the url is a bit deceiving, seeing '5day' in the url made me think that it would contain a 5 day forecast, but it only seems to be 1 day. Is there any chance this could have 5 days like the url suggests?
On 18/10/06, Michael Pritchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what would be
Title: Re: [backstage] Official BBC Weather feeds ahoy!
Hello,
Are there any plans to include the full 5-day forecasts in the feed?
Ta,
Mike
On 18/10/06 15:26, "Kathryn Schmitt" wrote:
Greetings Backstagers,
I am very pleased to inform you that BBC Weather's first RSS feeds are now live.
M: 0771 7582482
www.bbc.co.uk/weather
www.bbc.co.uk/climate
-- ------Michael PritchardWeb :: http://www.blueghost.co.uk
GMail:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]--
ED] On Behalf Of Michael Pritchard
Sent: 18 October 2006 19:40
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Official BBC Weather feeds ahoy!
what would be useful would be some sort of listing of all areas, such as an opml file. I don't fancy manually finding out what each of the 7379
Hello,
Pedantic bug-report:
There's an 'é' in world/4026.xml that I don't _think_ is valid XML
(because eacute isn't a predefined entity).
I wouldn't mention it otherwise, but it causes the parser I'm using to barf.
Tarra,
Mike
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscri
p. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial
list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
--
--
Michael Pritchard
Web :: http://www.blueghost.co.uk
GMail:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
the modelling of classical music, live music, sessions etc without
alienating his community. If there's enough interest it might be an
excuse for a musicbrainz/backstage/bbc meetup later this year
Sorry to be quite so open ended but if you've got an opinion on any of
this (or anything in a
provide the many
to one relationship that would be more semantically correct, imho.
Although my thoughts generally tend to verge towards the 'finding new
music' angle, I'd most likely be up for points 7 & 8 :-)
Cheers
Dave
PS First post n'all. And I should probably come
nuary 2007 16:55
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Music, (meta)data, musicbrainz and the BBC
Michael,
Ignoring for a while the question of why the BBC is now looking at
putting third-party music information services out of business, and
being constructive:
The major pro
te.com/prof_home.html
They seem to have the Song ID database sown up.
RichE
On 25 Jan 2007, at 16:55, James Cridland wrote:
Michael,
Ignoring for a while the question of why the BBC is now looking
at putting third-party music information services out of business, and
16:55
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Music, (meta)data, musicbrainz and the BBC
Michael,
Ignoring for a while the question of why the BBC is now looking at
putting third-party music information services out of business, and
being constructive:
The major problem we've fou
] Music, (meta)data, musicbrainz and the BBC
On 1/26/07, Michael Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can i ask what ur artist id and track id are:
var gimpdata="Steve Miller Band~391~The Joker~E148~A~Russ
Williams~williams~the music we all love~Contact
Russ
It shouldn't be forgotten that we (and the BBC) regularly don't play CDs
at all, using playout systems, minidiscs (eurgh), or other more esoteric
things from multiple studios.
and again the problems of live performance...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAI
hard P Edwards
Sent: 26 January 2007 15:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Music, (meta)data, musicbrainz and the BBC
Hi Michael,
The label's prefix is always in the ISRC code this may explain
further...
http://www.riaa.com/issues/audio/isrc_faq.asp
My understandin
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michael Smethurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > They should never be the exact same audio object with
> > different [isrc] codes. I'm just not sure this happens in
> > practice. According to our producti
es
from there.
However I can't see how your model of "only expired copyright media" or
having content providers *pay* the BBC would result in a service that
people would want to watch.
I personally like shows like Doctor Who, Battlestar Galactica, Stargate,
Backyardigans and so on. None of which are cheap. How do they get made
if they have to pay for space? What's their income?
Michael.
--
All opinions above are mine, and no-one elses, certainly not my employers.
able. Maybe.
Depending on space.)
-- http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/msg03135.html
I clearly misunderstood your intent there, my apologies, so I'll be
quiet :-) If you can articulate the economics better so I can understand,
I might pipe up again, but otherwise, I just can't understand your
economic model.
Michael.
--
These views are mine, and mine alone, don't confuse them with my
employers :)
<>
a really fancy shared printer)
[1] http://goldfndr.home.mindspring.com/urw.html
[2] Lulu requires the books to stipulate a license.
I know Cafepress do this as well, although I've found Lulu easier to work
with. (eg for making personalised notebooks)
Regards,
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks
implementation issue, since
you just virtualise the entire platform including TCPA module - which would
of course happen if you provide people with a sufficient incentive...)
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior Research Engineer, BBC Research, Future Media &
Technology,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing the /technology/ is broken. After all, using the
same technology you can make things like secure personal storage are
more secure and trustable by the user:
* http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6633
Michael.
--
All the above are my opinions only.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discu
utside the realms of your average developer, but it's not outside the
capabilities of a commercial company.
All clearly hypothetical examples, with varying levels of likelihood, but
since you say you work in the area, I'm curious as to the answer or pointers
since I suspect there is :)
Feel
erged into a release.
* http://kamaelia.sourceforge.net/KamaeliaProjectProcesses - basic project
processes.
If people are interested in previous history to date, we've held generally
weekly meetings online on #kamaelia on freenode's IRC network (as per
processes above)
I'll read up on the references,
you never know when the positive uses of the technology will be handy.
Regards,
Michael.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
for the user, scenarios.
Anyway, thanks for the pointers Tim, I'll keep on pondering them, and feel
free to point out where I've oversimplified to the point of misinforming or
simply misunderstood some points.
Regards,
Michael.
--
Kamaelia Project Lead
http://kamaelia.sourc
uld be:
* http://kamaelia.sourceforge.net/KamaeliaMacro
The code (since its just timeshifting) is here:
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/kamaelia/trunk/Code/Python/Kamaelia/Examples/DVB_Systems/Macro.py?revision=2257&view=markup
Michael
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To u
ink it is, just a note to say that if people are interested in
discussing Kamaelia related issues, I'd prefer that to happen on the Kamaelia
mailing lists (cf the "contact" part of the kamaelia website). (sad really,
since Kamaelia really does fall under the heading of "user ou
is the deadline ?
Monday midnight.
* URL?
http://code.google.com/soc/
Please feel free to forward this to any students or student groups you would
find this interesting ! :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
Michael Sparks, Senior Research Engineer, BBC Research, Technology Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED], K
ncludes details on adding
them to google maps.
all data available from http://bbc.blueghost.co.uk/travel_data/
any comments freely accepted.
Thanks,
Michael
--
------
Michael Pritchard
Web :: http://www.blueghost.co.uk
GMail:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
thanks for all the comments,
i'll do my best to work on these comments when i get some free time
On 10/04/07, mapperz . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael, Excellent work, have tracked your blueghost projects and like the
mapping integration with the new services from Google Maps
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
