Graham Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 10:47 on 2008-06-06:
> Matt Barber wrote:
> > Can't you send all traffic through port 80/443 anyway, using the proxy
> > transparently to filter traffic. You could then allow the Kontiki traffic in
> > the proxy ruleset?
>
> The proxies don't operate
Graham Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 11:37 on 2008-06-06:
> That's not my impression last time I looked at transparent proxying. The
> guides for setting up transparent proxies I have seen involve using SQUID in
> a reverse proxy mode, and then using say iptables to redirect the traffic
Graham Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 15:44 on 2008-06-06:
> Steffan Davies wrote:
> > Graham Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 11:37 on 2008-06-06:
> >
> > I've just tested it out - for recent versions all you need to do is add
> > the &q
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 08:22 on 2008-06-24:
> BBC News Algorithmic Sorter an attempt to try and work out what the
> British public are finding important. The main BBC News website offers
> a glimpse of what’s popular, but as with all things that’s
> limited to the audience
Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 16:47 on 2008-07-10:
> 2008/7/10 Ian Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > http://www.lively.com/html/landing.html
> >
> > I got to say this came out of the blue for me...
>
> It's Windows-only. Not that I think that's inherently bad (I'm sure
> someone will
Tim Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 17:28 on 2008-08-13:
> Simon Thompson wrote:
>> Tim Dobson wrote:
>>> that's the "A-View", the "AW-300" and the "AW-150" subnotebooks
>
>> All of which use Aday super486 CPUs.
>>
>> So these will be x86 compatible
>
> Eek.
>
> My lack of knowledge relating
Dave Crossland wrote at 16:50 on 2009-01-20:
> 2009/1/20 Ian Forrester :
> >
> > The reason why we would like to Tar the files together is because of things
> > like subtitles, artwork, cuts of music,
> > other metadata pieces, etc. We're not just talking a collection of video
> > files.
>
> W
Matt Barber wrote at 13:10 on 2009-02-11:
> What about all the jobs that people have when they develop software that
> is paid for and licensed? If the switch to free software were to
> suddenly happen, would these people find themselves out of work?
> This isn't a stab at anybody, it's just
Andy wrote at 17:43 on 2009-05-28:
> 2009/5/28 Andy :
> > FF claims it know about Real Player as a plugin, however I don't have
> > 'hxplay' or 'realplay' in the system path. Is the BBC player looking
> > for the specific binaries instead of a plugin?
>
> Still not sure why the Beeb require on R
Ian Stirling wrote at 17:42 on 2010-01-22:
>> a) ignore the licensing terms of the open source DVB stacks;
>> b) reverse-engineer the decoding tables;
>> c) obtain the tables from the BBC but breach the non-disclosure terms; or
>> d) release a box which doesn't support FVHD
>
> There is a third a
Mo McRoberts wrote at 18:15 on 2010-01-22:
>
> There’s also a secondary concern here, in that the terms under which
> the blob is distributed do not just pertain to what you do to the blob
> itself, but what you let the user do to both your device (i.e., no
> modifications) and to the content wh
Mo McRoberts wrote at 19:35 on 2010-01-22:
> On 22-Jan-2010, at 18:55, Steffan Davies wrote:
>
> > Oh, definitely. I wasn't saying that would be a good implementation,
> > just that it might permit appliance makers to comply without having to
> > reinvent the wh
12 matches
Mail list logo
