I tend to agree. It sounds like an image library archive project, not a
backup project.
Robert Trevellyan
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:36 AM Greg Harris
wrote:
> Yet another sideline sitter here. However, here goes with a very
> questionable thought. Maybe BackupPC is the wrong tool for this
Yet another sideline sitter here. However, here goes with a very questionable
thought. Maybe BackupPC is the wrong tool for this particular
directory/instance? Perhaps something like Amazon Glacier with Cryptomator is
a wiser choice in this one scenario?
Thanks,
Greg Harris
On Feb 17,
G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users wrote at about 13:24:26 + on Thursday,
February 17, 2022:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, brogeriofernandes wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after
> > client transfers file data but before it's stored in
Bruno Rogério Fernandes wrote at about 09:43:13 -0300 on Thursday, February 17,
2022:
> Maybe I've got a solution
>
> Instead of modifying backuppc behavior, I'm planning to disable
> compression setting at the server and create a FUSE filesystem that
> transparently compresses all the
"G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, brogeriofernandes wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after
> > client transfers file data but before it's stored in backuppc
> > pool. My idea is to do an image compression, like jpeg-xl
Hi there,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, brogeriofernandes wrote:
I'm wondering if would be possible to run a command just after
client transfers file data but before it's stored in backuppc
pool. My idea is to do an image compression, like jpeg-xl lossless,
instead of the standard zlib one.
Have you
Maybe I've got a solution
Instead of modifying backuppc behavior, I'm planning to disable
compression setting at the server and create a FUSE filesystem that
transparently compresses all the images using jpeg-xl format and put
backuppc pool on top of that.
The only problem I can think of is
