Item ?: Allow Schedule Resource to override NextPool
Date: 18 November 2009
Origin: Jim Barber. jim.bar...@ddihealth.com
Status: New request
What: Allow the Schedule resource to define a NextPool= statement
to override the NextPool statement of the pool defined in the job.
Why:
Hello,
I am sorry, but it is taking too much of my time to respond to you, and the
issues you are pointing out are non-issues because the Bacula code is
structured very different from what you think it is. The errors that are
generated by those calls if any are reported and noted, and Bacula w
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 13:31 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Marco,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have made the first small steps to be able to be able to use different
> > database backends in the same compiled binary. Just to be sure no
> > one else is working on the same code I just post here that I st
> The design choice is to not worry about some unlikely errors providing
> it is not important. In important cases for proper functioning of Bacula
> we should check.
I see it as a matter of service quality if the return value of the member
function "BSOCK::fsend" is ignored at places like the
Hello Marco,
> Hi,
>
> I have made the first small steps to be able to be able to use different
> database backends in the same compiled binary. Just to be sure no
> one else is working on the same code I just post here that I started
> with no idea when it will be ready but as it seems I just nee
Hello
It is the only portable way that I have found to get a clean traceback, so
we are not interested in using abort.
Kern
> Hello,
>
> I find the following instructions strange in your function "e_msg".
> http://bacula.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=bacula/bacula;a=blob;f=bacula/src/lib/
Hello,
I find the following instructions strange in your function "e_msg".
http://bacula.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=bacula/bacula;a=blob;f=bacula/src/lib/message.c;h=5791f6b51b95a43be565ad351630d7e48dd24029;hb=HEAD#l1078
if (type == M_ABORT) {
char *p = 0;
p[0] = 0;
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> 19.11.2009 10:07, Christian Gaul wrote:
>
>> Amongst many other clients, i backup my workstation using bacula (in
>> this case 3.0.3, but i've been seeing this since i started using bacula
>> with version 2.2 something).
>>
>> I can see the job for my client in
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> 19.11.2009 10:07, Christian Gaul wrote:
>
>> Amongst many other clients, i backup my workstation using bacula (in
>> this case 3.0.3, but i've been seeing this since i started using bacula
>> with version 2.2 something).
>>
>> I can see the job for my client in
Hello,
19.11.2009 10:07, Christian Gaul wrote:
> Amongst many other clients, i backup my workstation using bacula (in
> this case 3.0.3, but i've been seeing this since i started using bacula
> with version 2.2 something).
>
> I can see the job for my client in the director, it is in the status
>
Christian Gaul schrieb:
> Amongst many other clients, i backup my workstation using bacula (in
> this case 3.0.3, but i've been seeing this since i started using bacula
> with version 2.2 something).
>
> I can see the job for my client in the director, it is in the status
> "Waiting for client XXX
Hi
Can someone provide a statement or point me to some documentation on what
level of backup can be done on an exchange server 2003/2007, I have seen
various posts but would like a quick overview
We have a lot of customer's interested in using Bacula to backup and restore
exchange
Amongst many other clients, i backup my workstation using bacula (in
this case 3.0.3, but i've been seeing this since i started using bacula
with version 2.2 something).
I can see the job for my client in the director, it is in the status
"Waiting for client XXX to connect to storage YYY", and it
13 matches
Mail list logo
