Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-11-01 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 02/11/2018 00:09, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018/11/01 22:24, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: (As libtool is used to hide how things are compiled, I have no great interest in researching the failure.) FWIW, you can show the command lines with "make NO_ECHO=". I don't know why it seems so common to

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-11-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/11/01 22:24, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > (As libtool is used to hide how things are compiled, I have no great > interest in researching the failure.) FWIW, you can show the command lines with "make NO_ECHO=". I don't know why it seems so common to hide these nowadays, it makes debugging build

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-11-01 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 01/11/2018 20:30, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello Gary, The Bacula project uses GCC, and with it we do not get those errors.  If you are using a different compiler (as it seems you are doing), you are likely to find different "warnings".  Since we only use the gnu compiler, the best way to get r

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-31 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/31/18 11:17 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Phil, > > OK, great.  I wonder whether Oracle will continue that practice now that > RedHat has been bought by IBM? I won't be shocked if there's a raging catfight between Oracle and IBM over it. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Phil, OK, great.  I wonder whether Oracle will continue that practice now that RedHat has been bought by IBM? Best regards, Kern On 10/31/18 1:15 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 10/31/18 8:00 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello Phil, Davide (from Bacula Systems) is working on providing more

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-31 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/31/18 8:00 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Phil, > > Davide (from Bacula Systems) is working on providing more binaries. He > is a very busy person, and creating the rpms and the resulting binaries > the first time is a lot of work as they are significantly different from > the Bacula Sys

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Phil, Davide (from Bacula Systems) is working on providing more binaries. He is a very busy person, and creating the rpms and the resulting binaries the first time is a lot of work as they are significantly different from the Bacula Systems ones that he maintains.   I am sure that Davide

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/30/18 10:49 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > On 2018-10-31 00:52, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> Gentoo's Bacula package finally updated, and I'm able to do systemwide >> update at last. This includes my storage server which runs Solaris 11. >> I did eventually get it to compile, but with many warni

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 2018-10-31 00:52, Phil Stracchino wrote: Gentoo's Bacula package finally updated, and I'm able to do systemwide update at last. This includes my storage server which runs Solaris 11. I did eventually get it to compile, but with many warnings. Is anyone else here building Bacula on Solaris 1

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/30/18 3:10 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 10/30/18 3:07 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> On 10/30/18 3:05 PM, Davide Franco wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Rhel 7 binary packages (x86_64) for Bacula 9.2.1 are available on >>> bacula.org website. >> >> I previously looked, but did

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/30/18 3:07 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 10/30/18 3:05 PM, Davide Franco wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Rhel 7 binary packages (x86_64) for Bacula 9.2.1 are available on >> bacula.org website. > > I previously looked, but did not find them. Perhaps I looked in the > wrong plac

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/30/18 3:05 PM, Davide Franco wrote: > Hello, > > Rhel 7 binary packages (x86_64) for Bacula 9.2.1 are available on > bacula.org website. I previously looked, but did not find them. Perhaps I looked in the wrong place...? -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Davide Franco
Hello, Rhel 7 binary packages (x86_64) for Bacula 9.2.1 are available on bacula.org website. You should be able to use it on Oracle Enterprise Linux. Best regards Davide On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 16:51, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 10/30/18 10:44 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > On 10/30/18 9:52 A

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/30/18 10:44 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 10/30/18 9:52 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> Gentoo's Bacula package finally updated, and I'm able to do systemwide >> update at last. This includes my storage server which runs Solaris 11. >> I did eventually get it to compile, but with many warni

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/30/18 9:52 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Gentoo's Bacula package finally updated, and I'm able to do systemwide > update at last. This includes my storage server which runs Solaris 11. > I did eventually get it to compile, but with many warnings. Is anyone > else here building Bacula on Sol

[Bacula-devel] Bacula 9.2.1

2018-10-30 Thread Phil Stracchino
Gentoo's Bacula package finally updated, and I'm able to do systemwide update at last. This includes my storage server which runs Solaris 11. I did eventually get it to compile, but with many warnings. Is anyone else here building Bacula on Solaris 11.3? -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Commun