Yes, I am aware of these techniques of keeping hash codes. For lots of files,
it works out to be an enormous amount of information that must be kept --
just do the mathematics for 1,000,000 files (times about 40 machines) each
file with an average of 20 MB of data gives hash code an links of
hi,
I use bacula 1.36.2 installed with the debian/sarge packages
I have this pool:
Pool {
Name = PascalPool
Pool Type = Backup
AutoPrune = yes
# Use Volume Once = yes
Recycle = yes
Label Format = Volume-
Volume Retention = 10 days
Maximun Volume Jobs = 1
Maximun Volumes = 10
Sorry! Maximun idiot!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I use bacula 1.36.2 installed with the debian/sarge packages
I have this pool:
Pool {
Name = PascalPool
Pool Type = Backup
AutoPrune = yes
# Use Volume Once = yes
Recycle = yes
Label Format = Volume-
Volume Retention = 10 days
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Maximun Volume Jobs = 1
--^ m
Maximun Volumes = 10
--^ m
Accept Any Volume = no
}
and when i start the director i obtain:
Config error: Keyword MaximunVolumeJobs not permitted in this resource.
Perhaps you left the trailing
Hello,
On 1/4/2006 1:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I use bacula 1.36.2 installed with the debian/sarge packages
I have this pool:
Pool {
Name = PascalPool
Pool Type = Backup
AutoPrune = yes
# Use Volume Once = yes
Recycle = yes
Label Format = Volume-
Volume Retention = 10
Hello,
On 1/4/2006 12:12 AM, Joe Dollard wrote:
I've run into a performance problem when doing backups to tape that I
need some help in resolving. According to the output from btape test,
my tape drive can be written to at around 9,700 KB/s. I've also run a
test with the Windows file
Someone asked me what types of installations are using Bacula as their
main backup system. I didn't know of any such experience reports, and
so I thought I'd describe the installation where I'm using Bacula, and
see what other types of setups are in use. Here goes...
I've been using Bacula for
Hello,
Please always copy the list.
Unfortunately, you didn't supply any of the basic info requested on the Bugs
page of the web site, so I cannot give you much help.
My two suggestsions:
1. Read in detail the ReleaseNotes -- most likely you will find the key there
2. From the little info I
Arno,
Thanks again. Excellent explanation, especially getting through my
thick skull! (lol) Although I am making progress, I am still having
some issues. Last night, my incremental worked except those that were
blocked by the catalog backup that did not work. After I cancelled
the
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 16:21, Arthur Emerson III wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
There seems to be some problem here, because the rescue rpm
should load a copy of the rescue directory that knows that
it was installed by an rpm and hence it should pick up the
static bacula FD that was
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:57, Brian Keifer wrote:
Quoting Martin Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think the setting of strict mode in the MySQL config is a possible
reason for this error.
It sure is - good catch. =) Is it possible to run Bacula with this
restriction
in place?
Sorry,
Hi
Is it possible to backup a machine with a DHCP ip#?
If not, how big a change is needed to get it supported? 100 line patch or a
major rewrite?
Regards THomas
--
In the 60's people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird,
people take prozac to make it normal.
Hello again,
I forgot to mention that it would be better to address your results to the
bacula-devel list. Thanks.
On Thursday 29 December 2005 08:34, Moritz Bunkus wrote:
Hey,
A couple of months ago we've replaced another backup solution with
Bacula. Very nice piece of software, we're
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 17:30 +0100, Thomas S. Iversen wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to backup a machine with a DHCP ip#?
Just use Bind and DHCP together. Then you can use simple domain names.
Mario
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
On Thursday 29 December 2005 14:19, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
Someone wiser than me needs to decide, if it's ok simply to change back
user
to root. Or is there a reason why not to do this? Are there some other
changes that would really require a non-root user?
Btw, this applies not only to
Searching has so far only turned up one old post in another mailing list
suggested Bacula needed a patch to handle this, so let me ask here.
Will Bacula back up and restore the xattrs (extended attributes) used by
SELinux? My environment is RHEL4, but SELinux xattrs are common across all
On Thursday 29 December 2005 08:34, Moritz Bunkus wrote:
Hey,
A couple of months ago we've replaced another backup solution with
Bacula. Very nice piece of software, we're very satisfied. Our setup
isn't that big: a single DDS5 tape drive to which six servers are backed
up. A full backup
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:45:32AM -0700, Gary Kopp wrote:
Searching has so far only turned up one old post in another mailing list
suggested Bacula needed a patch to handle this, so let me ask here.
Will Bacula back up and restore the xattrs (extended attributes) used by
SELinux? My
As is documented, when Bacula backs up a hard link it makes sure the
linked-to file is only backed up once, and generates warning messages on all
links to the same file after the first one. On full backups of most Linux
systems this can produce a flood of messages. One way to avoid this is turn
Hello,
If you are not getting any response to your questions, you might try looking
at the Support page on the Bacula web site that tells you what *basic*
information is needed for getting support.
It is terribly frustrating for me (and I assume others who would like to help)
to read emails
In many respects Bacula's conf parser is rather stupid and does not do a good
job checking for erronous input data -- mainly due to my lack of time ...
You stepped deep into it with several instances of something like:
Name = USB SimpleTech 400GB external hard drive
which is totally broken
In case Kern's just-posted reminder about needed information for support was
aimed at me, I'm running Bacula 1.38.2 on RHEL4 Update 2.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Kopp
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:00 AM
To:
Thanks, Frank. I'm building a new Internet-facing network, and the only
server where I know I need the added protection of SELinux is my web
server/SMTP relay. I don't know if FC is the same, but with RHEL4 a
targeted policy is installed by default. A quick study of the RH doc
makes me think
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 10:28, Beren Gamble wrote:
I'm having to unmount and remount my tapes all of a sudden to get bacula
to realise that i've physically changed the tapes.
I've got AutomaticMount = Yes in my pool resource... any other ideas
what I could try?
Same here with version
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 17:30, Thomas S. Iversen wrote:
Is it possible to backup a machine with a DHCP ip#?
If not, how big a change is needed to get it supported? 100 line patch or a
major rewrite?
Sorry, I found the answer myself. I'm not lucky enough to have access to a DNS
server
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 14:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry! Maximun idiot!
Ah, your comment made my day with a nice laugh :-)
PS: I hope the rest of the learning curve is easier ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I use bacula 1.36.2 installed with the debian/sarge packages
I have
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 17:59, Gary Kopp wrote:
As is documented, when Bacula backs up a hard link it makes sure the
linked-to file is only backed up once, and generates warning messages on
all links to the same file after the first one. On full backups of most
Linux systems this can
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 17:54, Frank Sweetser wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:45:32AM -0700, Gary Kopp wrote:
Searching has so far only turned up one old post in another mailing list
suggested Bacula needed a patch to handle this, so let me ask here.
Will Bacula back up and restore
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 18:37, Gary Kopp wrote:
In case Kern's just-posted reminder about needed information for support
was aimed at me, I'm running Bacula 1.38.2 on RHEL4 Update 2.
No, my reminder was not at all directed at you. Your request was clear,
precise, and showed you
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 18:48, Gary Kopp wrote:
Thanks, Frank. I'm building a new Internet-facing network, and the only
server where I know I need the added protection of SELinux is my web
server/SMTP relay. I don't know if FC is the same, but with RHEL4 a
targeted policy is installed
Not only am I not an ACL expert either, neither am I adequately
knowledgeable about SELinux. So, I'm really hoping Frank can explain xattrs
in the context of backup.
--Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern Sibbald
Sent: Wednesday,
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:27:30 +0100, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Kern On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:57, Brian Keifer wrote:
Quoting Martin Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think the setting of strict mode in the MySQL config is a possible
reason for this error.
It sure
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 19:36, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:27:30 +0100, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Kern On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:57, Brian Keifer wrote:
Quoting Martin Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think the setting of strict mode in the MySQL
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:19:30PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I am not an ACL expert, so could you explain to me what the difference
between xattrs are and regular Linux ACLs, which can be backed up and
restored by Bacula?
SELinux uses a different mechanism than ACLs. The way it works is
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 20:19, Frank Sweetser wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:19:30PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I am not an ACL expert, so could you explain to me what the difference
between xattrs are and regular Linux ACLs, which can be backed up and
restored by Bacula?
SELinux
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:57:46PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Not quite.
I run SELinux here on my server so I have a reasonable idea (rather primitave
though) of how it works. Are you telling me that libacl returns only a
subset of the possible extended attributes? If that is the
Thanks. That is what I needed. I'll look at this in more detail in the near
future to see if there isn't some simple extension to the currrent Bacula ACL
mechanism for handling it ...
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:07, you wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:57:46PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:15:38PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Thanks. That is what I needed. I'll look at this in more detail in the near
future to see if there isn't some simple extension to the currrent Bacula ACL
mechanism for handling it ...
Great! Asking about backing up selinux
Hi,
Before you flame me for still using tar let me explain my situation.
I use Bacula to backup all my servers to hard drive volumes. I
also use tar to tapes to do a daily backup of a few directories for
offsite storage. I use tar because I know that I can get my data
off with a minimal set of
Hello,
On 1/4/2006 11:03 PM, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
Hello List,
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 20:54 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
On 12/30/2005 2:51 PM, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
Hello List,
i would like to back up my files to DVD-RAM.
I simply format my DVD-RAM with: mkfs.ext3 /dev/hdd and then
Hello,
On 1/4/2006 4:57 PM, John Hayden wrote:
Arno,
Thanks again. Excellent explanation, especially getting through my
thick skull! (lol)
I see you're working in a medical institution - have you started your
career in radiology and still carry around the lead protection?
;-P
Hello,
On 1/4/2006 2:48 PM, John Kodis wrote:
Someone asked me what types of installations are using Bacula as their
main backup system. I didn't know of any such experience reports,
Hmm. Perhaps some people with interesting installations might be
reminded to send a small report for the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps: yes it is not really the place for this question but this question
is too avoid to post somethings that could be solved few month ago. Is
it some way to do a search query to the mail archive?
Try Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Bacula-f14014.html - you can search
Hello,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
people chose - apart from that, I never saw anything more complex than a
handfull of pools and a single DIR with a single SD in one installation.
Well, I'm running a DIR with two SD's here (actually two such
setups). This works fine,
Thomas S. Iversen wrote:
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 17:30, Thomas S. Iversen wrote:
Is it possible to backup a machine with a DHCP ip#?
If not, how big a change is needed to get it supported? 100 line patch or a
major rewrite?
Sorry, I found the answer myself. I'm not lucky enough
Good morning.
I'm just wondering if Automatic Mount = yes is still working as expected?
My SD conf, upgraded from the old 1.36 to match the new autochanger:
Autochanger {
Name= TapeChanger
Device = TapeStorage
Changer Device = /dev/changer ##
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 23:17, Eric Peterson wrote:
Hi,
Before you flame me for still using tar let me explain my situation.
I use Bacula to backup all my servers to hard drive volumes. I also use
tar to tapes to do a daily backup of a few directories for offsite storage.
I use tar
47 matches
Mail list logo
