On 9/21/2017 11:22 AM, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
That's useful and makes perfect sense, thank you.
I'm new to both Bacula and LTO.
Just inherited Bacula 5.2 with LTO-4 and considering an upgrade.
LTO-4 doesn't support LTFS.
So I haven't found a way of examining / browsing what actually Bacula
writ
Ah ha! I had forgotten that point. The system that it is backing up is
bigger still. Two Xeon cpu's with 16 processors and 24 GB of memory. I
don't run this concurrently with other backups on this system as I had to
split them into 2 different backups due to the size. It was reaching 5 TB
of data
That's useful and makes perfect sense, thank you.
I'm new to both Bacula and LTO.
Just inherited Bacula 5.2 with LTO-4 and considering an upgrade.
LTO-4 doesn't support LTFS.
So I haven't found a way of examining / browsing what actually Bacula
writes to the tapes.
I can only see things like la
On 9/21/2017 6:23 AM, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
Hello,
A hypothetical scenario.
I have Bacula 9 running on Debian 9 and writing to LTO-7 tapes
(Quantum-Ultrium).
Can I read these tapes elsewhere without Bacula?
Normally that would require tapes to be formatted to LTFS.
Can Bacula write to LTFS t
On 9/20/2017 2:15 PM, Jerry Lowry wrote:
Hi,
I have just started encrypting my backup jobs. I have one full backup
that went from completing in
Scheduled time: 12-Aug-2017 20:05:00
Start time: 13-Aug-2017 06:16:47
End time: 13-Aug-2017 15:26:35
Elaps
Hello,
A hypothetical scenario.
I have Bacula 9 running on Debian 9 and writing to LTO-7 tapes
(Quantum-Ultrium).
Can I read these tapes elsewhere without Bacula?
Normally that would require tapes to be formatted to LTFS.
Can Bacula write to LTFS tapes or can it only use own native data struct
