Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 1/4/22 17:18, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > Thanks Bill, you nailed it. > > 04-Jan-2022 16:13:52 FD: backup.c:1356-884680 > fname=/Users/USER/Library/Containers/com.apple.Safari.CacheDeleteExtension > snap=/Users/USER/Library/Containers/com.apple.Safari.CacheDeleteExtension >

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread David Brodbeck
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:56 AM Graham Sparks wrote: > I've personally not run in to problems with System Integrity Protection, > although I do give the bacula-fd executable "Full Disk" permissions. > What I find is bacula-fd is unable to back up files in users Desktop, Documents, etc. folders

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
Thanks Bill, you nailed it. 04-Jan-2022 16:13:52 FD: backup.c:1356-884680 fname=/Users/USER/Library/Containers/com.apple.Safari.CacheDeleteExtension snap=/Users/USER/Library/Containers/com.apple.Safari.CacheDeleteExtension

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Graham Sparks
Sorry for giving the wrong path--I did mean the 'bacula_config' file in './etc'. Large file support is off on my client too, so ignore me. Just read the message from Bill, and that's all sounding plausible (I don't enable xattrs in the FileSet I back up, and local snapshots taken by Time

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Graham Sparks
I'm afraid I don't enable encryption in my backup jobs (I know I should ) so I don't know if that causes an issue. I'll have a quick look some time to see what happens when I enable encryption. I think I've reached my limit here, but it might be worth checking the following file to make sure

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 1/4/22 12:26, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > Yes, backing up a single file on my problem hosts does succeed. > > H... > > Stephen Hello Stephen, This issue looked familiar to me, so I checked internally and I think I found something. I am pretty sure that this is an issue due to the larger

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
Thanks. I have large file support off, though I am not sure that's intentional. I will double check that. On 1/4/22 11:55 AM, Graham Sparks wrote: I'm afraid I don't enable encryption in my backup jobs (I know I should ) so I don't know if that causes an issue. I'll have a quick look

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-04 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 1/4/2022 12:21 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: ... This is why for many years now my NAS has run Solaris.  It is THE reference implementation of NFS. Same reason we kept our storage on Solaris for as long as we could at $work[-1], long after Sun quit doing 50% off "educational" sales and

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
However, even just backing up /Users results in... 04-Jan 11:31 SD JobId 88: Fatal error: bsock.c:530 Packet size=1387166 too big from "client:1.2.3.4:9103". Maximum permitted 100. Terminating connection. Stephen On 1/4/22 11:26 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: Yes, backing up

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
Graham, Thanks. I am confident that it's not a networking issue (at least one external to the Macs). The new problem only shows on hosts that have been updated to Big Sur or Monterey (with or without rebuilt client, both 9x and 11s). High Sierra and earlier hosts never yield the 'too

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
Yes, backing up a single file on my problem hosts does succeed. H... Stephen On 1/4/22 11:23 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: That's a good test, which I apparently have not tried.  I will do so. thanks, Stephen On 1/4/22 11:20 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: Is this happening for all

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
That's a good test, which I apparently have not tried. I will do so. thanks, Stephen On 1/4/22 11:20 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: Is this happening for all backups? What happens if you run a backup with a minimal fileset that lists just one small file? __Martin On Tue, 4 Jan 2022

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Martin Simmons
Is this happening for all backups? What happens if you run a backup with a minimal fileset that lists just one small file? __Martin > On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 08:13:46 -0800, Stephen Thompson said: > > I am still seeing the same issue on Monterey as on Big Sur with 11.0.5 > compiled from source

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Graham Sparks
Hi Stephen, I've had a quick read of the archive (I'm late to the mailing list party) and see you've tried lots, so I'll try to say something constructive. I tried to recreate the packet size error, crudely, by directing the Bacula server to a web page instead of the client FD (incidentally,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-04 Thread Phil Stracchino
Just to wrap up, the definitive answer to Bacula on QNAP: There is a third-party Bacula 9.0.5 package for QNAP NAS which can be obtained from https://qnapclub.eu/en. No idea if or when it will be updated to 11.0.5. Other than that, fuhgeddaboudit. And you probably don't want to run

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Graham Sparks
Hi David, I use Time Machine (for the System disk) as well as Bacula on my Mac, as I'd still need the Time Machine backup to do a bare-metal restore (with Apps). I use Bacula to back up this and an external data drive. Rather than purchasing a separate "Time Capsule", I set up Samba on a Linux

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-04 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 1/3/22 21:05, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: That can sometimes be fixed by setting the mount to be soft rather than hard, or vice-versa, but the Linux implementation of NFS leaves a lot to be desired, at both ends. (Speaking as a person who was a tech lead at SGI's "File Serving Systems" and wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
I am still seeing the same issue on Monterey as on Big Sur with 11.0.5 compiled from source and CoreFoundation linked in. 04-Jan 07:56 SD JobId 88: Fatal error: bsock.c:530 Packet size=1387165 too big from "client:1.2.3.4:9103". Maximum permitted 100. Terminating connection. Stephen

Re: [Bacula-users] Cloud Storage Alternatives to AWS

2022-01-04 Thread Anders Gustafsson
FWIW, that is what we do as well. -- Med vänlig hälsning Anders Gustafsson, ingenjör anders.gustafs...@pedago.fi | Support +358 18 12060 | Direkt +358 9 315 45 121 | Mobil +358 40506 7099 Pedago interaktiv ab, Nygatan 7 B , AX-22100 MARIEHAMN, ÅLAND, FINLAND >>> Chris Wilkinson

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-04 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 1/4/22 15:39, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: But if your network is dodgy, then iSCSI may be just as dodgy as NFS. (iSCSI over FC, however, works very well.) ... and I wouldn't want to risk locking up a server, even partially, just because the backup NAS locked. bye av.

Re: [Bacula-users] Cloud Storage Alternatives to AWS

2022-01-04 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello Chris, > I have SD pointing to a local mount point mounted by rclone mount... so gdrive > just appears as a directory, same as any disk. So I'm not sure what you mean > by > Cloud resource? Nevermind. I thought you are using the Bacula S3 Cloud Driver. Mounted object storages are really

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Stephen Thompson
Graham, Thanks for presenting Monterey as a possibility! I am seeing the same issue under Monterrey as I have under Big Sur, but to know someone else does not means that it's possible. I should double check that I am using a freshly compiled client on Monterey and not just the one that I

Re: [Bacula-users] Cloud Storage Alternatives to AWS

2022-01-04 Thread Chris Wilkinson
I have SD pointing to a local mount point mounted by rclone mount... so gdrive just appears as a directory, same as any disk. So I'm not sure what you mean by Cloud resource? Best Chris On Tue, 4 Jan 2022, 1:35 p.m. Heitor Faria, wrote: > Hello Chris, > > I got 'rclone mount..’ working to

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-04 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 05/01/2022 00:43, Dmitri Maziuk wrote: On 1/3/2022 8:05 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: On 04/01/2022 05:47, David Brodbeck wrote: ... I could see iSCSI maybe working better, but I haven't tried it. iSCSI is not the same as NFS (or SMB), it shares a "raw device" which the mounting system

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-04 Thread Graham Sparks
Hi David, I use Time Machine (for the System disk) as well as Bacula on my Mac, as I'd still need the Time Machine backup to do a bare-metal restore (with Apps). I use Bacula to back up this and an external data drive. Rather than purchasing a separate "Time Capsule", I set up Samba on a Linux

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-04 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 1/3/2022 8:05 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: On 04/01/2022 05:47, David Brodbeck wrote: ... I could see iSCSI maybe working better, but I haven't tried it. iSCSI is not the same as NFS (or SMB), it shares a "raw device" which the mounting system then formats and uses, the device can't be

Re: [Bacula-users] Cloud Storage Alternatives to AWS

2022-01-04 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello Chris, > I got 'rclone mount..’ working to mount GDrive as a local mount. A 1GB test > backup took 2h:41m (109kb/s), so not a great result. The server running > SD/FD/DIR is on a 1Gbe connection to a 300/50 FTTP line so Google seems to be > the bandwidth limiter here. > However I did not

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-04 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 1/3/2022 1:31 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: I did consider completely wiping the thing and installing either Gentoo Linux or Solaris x86.  But I hesitate to do that on a brand new unit still under warranty. I usually pull out the system drive and stick a clean one in for this. But they