Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 11.06 RPMs (Cloud Storage)

2022-05-07 Thread Davide F.
Hi, cloud storage rpm’s uploaded for 11.0.6 Best regards On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 20:00 sruckh--- via Bacula-users < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Are the additional RPMs (for cloud-storage) that are in the 11.05 > directory going to be added to the 11.06 directory? > > Thank You.

[Bacula-users] Bacula 11.06 RPMs (Cloud Storage)

2022-05-06 Thread sruckh--- via Bacula-users
Are the additional RPMs (for cloud-storage) that are in the 11.05 directory going to be added to the 11.06 directory? Thank You. Scott ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2017-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Daniele, It has been released in the Enterprise addition at the end of February. As I reported in my last status report (see www.bacula.org), I am now backporting the changes from the Enterprise version. All the new Enterprise SD plugins will not be available in the first community

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2017-03-19 Thread Daniele Palumbo
Hi Kern, News about it? Thanks, Daniele > Il giorno 18 ott 2016, alle ore 14:13, Kern Sibbald ha > scritto: > > Hello, > > Bacula Systems has a White Paper on Bacula Enterprise Edition in the > cloud, and they have given me permission to publish it. However, as it > is

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
:29 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud   From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation:   Max Run Time = <time> The time specifies the maximum allowed time t

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-19 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Wednesday 2016-10-19 06:41:53 Roberts, Ben wrote: > The documentation is outdated and this limit was removed (or perhaps > vastly increased?) somewhere around the 7 mark. I’ve had jobs running a > lot longer since upgrading. > > In branch-5.2: >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-19 Thread Roberts, Ben
ers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation: Max Run Time = The time specifies the maximum allowed time that a job may run, counted from when the job starts, (not necessarily the same as when the job was scheduled). By default, the the watch

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 21:28:44 Clark, Patti wrote: > From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation: > > Max Run Time = The time specifies the maximum allowed time that a > job may run, counted from when the job starts, (not necessarily the > same as when the job was scheduled). By default, the the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Heitor Faria
> Thank you all for your responses. > > I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're > talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives > discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a > replica on SpiderOak or anything similar. Hello,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Clark, Patti
acula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud On Tuesday 2016-10-18 12:34:08 Jason Voorhees wrote: Thank you all for your responses. I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're talking about. Meanw

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 12:34:08 Jason Voorhees wrote: > Thank you all for your responses. > > I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're > talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives > discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Jason Voorhees
Thank you all for your responses. I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a replica on SpiderOak or anything similar. I hope we can have

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread C M Reinehr
On 10/17/2016 09:37 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote: > Hello guys: > > Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up > information to the cloud preferably using Bacula? > > I've been reading some posts about similar topics. Bandwidth always > seem to be a problem because it isn't

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Bacula Systems has a White Paper on Bacula Enterprise Edition in the cloud, and they have given me permission to publish it. However, as it is currently written for Bacula Enterprise customers it needs some modification, which I will make over the next week or so then release it. It

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Josh Fisher
On 10/18/2016 3:42 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Hello Jason, > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:37:12PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote: >> Hello guys: >> >> Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up >> information to the cloud preferably using Bacula? >> > I wrote a script a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-18 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hello Jason, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:37:12PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote: > Hello guys: > > Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up > information to the cloud preferably using Bacula? > I wrote a script a while ago that runs as a RunAfterJob element which

[Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-17 Thread Jason Voorhees
Hello guys: Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up information to the cloud preferably using Bacula? I've been reading some posts about similar topics. Bandwidth always seem to be a problem because it isn't to big (Gigs per second) or there's to much information

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula to the Cloud

2010-03-11 Thread Peter Zenge
Jobs = 20... Any other reason why I couldn't run say 5 parallel jobs with different filesets off the same client? From: Peter Zenge [mailto:pze...@ilinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 2:57 PM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Bacula-users] Bacula to the Cloud Hello, 2 year

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula to the Cloud

2010-03-11 Thread Dan Langille
On 3/11/2010 4:31 PM, Peter Zenge wrote: Following up on my own post, I had a little free time the other day and decided to investigate whether this was feasible. Setting up the necessary services on Amazon was trivial, including access control and block storage. I tried s3fs first, and it

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula to the Cloud

2010-03-03 Thread Christian Gaul
Am 02.03.2010 22:56, schrieb Peter Zenge: Hello, 2 year Bacula user but first-time poster. I'm currently dumping about 1.6TB to LTO2 tapes every week and I'm looking to migrate to a new storage medium. The obvious answer, I think, is a direct-attached disk array (which I would be able to

[Bacula-users] Bacula to the Cloud

2010-03-02 Thread Peter Zenge
Hello, 2 year Bacula user but first-time poster. I'm currently dumping about 1.6TB to LTO2 tapes every week and I'm looking to migrate to a new storage medium. The obvious answer, I think, is a direct-attached disk array (which I would be able to put in a remote gigabit-attached datacenter