Hi,
cloud storage rpm’s uploaded for 11.0.6
Best regards
On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 20:00 sruckh--- via Bacula-users <
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Are the additional RPMs (for cloud-storage) that are in the 11.05
> directory going to be added to the 11.06 directory?
>
> Thank You.
Are the additional RPMs (for cloud-storage) that are in the 11.05
directory going to be added to the 11.06 directory?
Thank You.
Scott
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Hello Daniele,
It has been released in the Enterprise addition at the end of February.
As I reported in my last status report (see www.bacula.org), I am now
backporting the changes from the Enterprise version. All the new
Enterprise SD plugins will not be available in the first community
Hi Kern,
News about it?
Thanks,
Daniele
> Il giorno 18 ott 2016, alle ore 14:13, Kern Sibbald ha
> scritto:
>
> Hello,
>
> Bacula Systems has a White Paper on Bacula Enterprise Edition in the
> cloud, and they have given me permission to publish it. However, as it
> is
:29
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud
From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation:
Max Run Time =
<time> The time specifies the
maximum allowed time t
On Wednesday 2016-10-19 06:41:53 Roberts, Ben wrote:
> The documentation is outdated and this limit was removed (or perhaps
> vastly increased?) somewhere around the 7 mark. I’ve had jobs running a
> lot longer since upgrading.
>
> In branch-5.2:
>
ers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud
From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation:
Max Run Time = The time specifies the maximum allowed time that a job
may run, counted from when the job starts, (not necessarily the same as when
the job was scheduled).
By default, the the watch
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 21:28:44 Clark, Patti wrote:
> From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation:
>
> Max Run Time = The time specifies the maximum allowed time that a
> job may run, counted from when the job starts, (not necessarily the
> same as when the job was scheduled). By default, the the
> Thank you all for your responses.
>
> I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
> talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives
> discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a
> replica on SpiderOak or anything similar.
Hello,
acula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 12:34:08 Jason Voorhees wrote:
Thank you all for your responses.
I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
talking about. Meanw
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 12:34:08 Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Thank you all for your responses.
>
> I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
> talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives
> discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a
Thank you all for your responses.
I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives
discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a
replica on SpiderOak or anything similar.
I hope we can have
On 10/17/2016 09:37 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hello guys:
>
> Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up
> information to the cloud preferably using Bacula?
>
> I've been reading some posts about similar topics. Bandwidth always
> seem to be a problem because it isn't
Hello,
Bacula Systems has a White Paper on Bacula Enterprise Edition in the
cloud, and they have given me permission to publish it. However, as it
is currently written for Bacula Enterprise customers it needs some
modification, which I will make over the next week or so then release it.
It
On 10/18/2016 3:42 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:37:12PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote:
>> Hello guys:
>>
>> Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up
>> information to the cloud preferably using Bacula?
>>
> I wrote a script a
Hello Jason,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:37:12PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hello guys:
>
> Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up
> information to the cloud preferably using Bacula?
>
I wrote a script a while ago that runs as a RunAfterJob element which
Hello guys:
Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up
information to the cloud preferably using Bacula?
I've been reading some posts about similar topics. Bandwidth always
seem to be a problem because it isn't to big (Gigs per second) or
there's to much information
Jobs = 20... Any other reason why
I couldn't run say 5 parallel jobs with different filesets off the same client?
From: Peter Zenge [mailto:pze...@ilinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 2:57 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Bacula to the Cloud
Hello, 2 year
On 3/11/2010 4:31 PM, Peter Zenge wrote:
Following up on my own post, I had a little free time the other day and
decided to investigate whether this was feasible. Setting up the
necessary services on Amazon was trivial, including access control and
block storage. I tried s3fs first, and it
Am 02.03.2010 22:56, schrieb Peter Zenge:
Hello, 2 year Bacula user but first-time poster. I'm currently
dumping about 1.6TB to LTO2 tapes every week and I'm looking to
migrate to a new storage medium.
The obvious answer, I think, is a direct-attached disk array (which I
would be able to
Hello, 2 year Bacula user but first-time poster. I'm currently dumping about
1.6TB to LTO2 tapes every week and I'm looking to migrate to a new storage
medium.
The obvious answer, I think, is a direct-attached disk array (which I would be
able to put in a remote gigabit-attached datacenter
21 matches
Mail list logo