Christoff van Zyl wrote:
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the
website
And issue a press release.
That will stop the rumour mill doing overtime and hopefully prevent any
individual or organisation pointing to the bug as why Bacula shouldn't
be used.
As bacula
Arno Lehmann wrote:
We really need a good technical writer to create a short, concise and
exact Getting Started manual, but the necessary skills are,
unfortunately, not very common among open source people.
Getting started guides must not be written by those are very famliar
with the
Hi,
13.09.2007 17:30,, Alan Brown wrote::
Arno Lehmann wrote:
We really need a good technical writer to create a short, concise and
exact Getting Started manual, but the necessary skills are,
unfortunately, not very common among open source people.
Getting started guides must not be
On 13 Sep 2007 at 16:30, Alan Brown wrote:
Arno Lehmann wrote:
We really need a good technical writer to create a short, concise and
exact Getting Started manual, but the necessary skills are,
unfortunately, not very common among open source people.
Getting started guides must
Hello,
the history of using 2.1.28 in a production system is that at that
time we discovered the bug that is just now actual for everyone and
while we were trying to find what and how to actually run Bacula that
can be used for what it is supposed we ended with 2.1.28 and no
concurrent jobs. I am
Kern,
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:13:45 am Kern Sibbald wrote:
PS: Does this affect spooled simultaneous jobs, or only simultaneous
jobs that are simultaneously writing to storage?
Please re-read item 1 of my announcement (above).
Sorry to say that but since more than one person (that
On Sunday 09 September 2007 23:46:24 Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
Hi,
10.09.2007 02:23,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
Arno,
On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:07:42 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
...
On a related issue: I have asked this question before but never get any
answer.
Documentation states (from Data Spooling
Hi,
10.09.2007 09:32,, Christoff van Zyl wrote::
...
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
about this bug.
I think Kern's working on it.
Arno
--
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
www.its-lehmann.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Adzhubey wrote:
Kern,
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:13:45 am Kern Sibbald wrote:
PS: Does this affect spooled simultaneous jobs, or only simultaneous
jobs that are simultaneously writing to storage?
Please re-read item 1 of my
On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
about this bug.
Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
list announcment.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
Available for hire:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless there
is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not -- it
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:27, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the
website about this bug.
Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
list announcment.
Well,
Yes, that is an important point that I forgot to mention. The bug is in the
Storage daemon, so there is no need to change any of the File daemons (or the
Director).
Should the patch fix the auto-restore of previous backups too or is it
still necessary to restore this data manually?
If
On 10 Sep 2007 at 10:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 10 Sep 2007 at 9:32, Christoff van Zyl wrote:
My 2c thought, is there a possibility to put a notification on the website
about this bug.
Kern: I will put a note on the homepage with a link to the mailing
list announcment.
Done, but
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:58, user100 wrote:
Yes, that is an important point that I forgot to mention. The bug is in
the Storage daemon, so there is no need to change any of the File daemons
(or the Director).
Should the patch fix the auto-restore of previous backups too or is it
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:39, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
there is some really compelling reason to create one, I would
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 10.09.07 um 18:49 Uhr:
On Monday 10 September 2007 16:39, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
there is
Hello,
we did our test:
- first we used the current version we have running now (2.1.28), just
to assure we can reproduce it always (probably). Run 4 concurrent
jobs, after restore 2 of them (that are larger) failed as usual with
missing files and error messages that some restored files have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
Hello,
we did our test:
- first we used the current version we have running now (2.1.28), just
to assure we can reproduce it always (probably). Run 4 concurrent
jobs, after restore 2 of them (that are larger) failed
Hello,
I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
have a fairly extensive regression test suite that explicitly
Dear Kern,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I have uploaded patches to bug #935 (bugs.bacula.org) that will correct
version 2.2.0, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2. The patch has been tested only on version
2.2.2 and passes all regression tests as well as the specific test that
reproduced the
Hello,
thank you that you finally admit there is a bug.
As when we first discovered the bug, we could reproduce it almost on
every test. I will provide feedback if this is fixed in 2.2.3 once it
is released.
Just one question - is the bug in dir or sd?
I am asking that to know what to update
Hi Kern,
First of all thank you for your efforts on confirming and fixing this nasty
bug! Now at least I know it was not something I did wrong in my configuration
(I have struggled with multiple simultaneous jobs spanning several volumes
for quite some time, as you can see from my earlier
On Sunday 09 September 2007 06:27:50 pm Ivan Adzhubey wrote:
Hi Kern,
First of all thank you for your efforts on confirming and fixing this nasty
bug! Now at least I know it was not something I did wrong in my
configuration (I have struggled with multiple simultaneous jobs spanning
several
Hi,
10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
...
On a related issue: I have asked this question before but never get any
answer.
Documentation states (from Data Spooling article):
While the spooled data is being written to the tape, the despooling process
has exclusive use of the tape.
Arno,
On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:07:42 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
...
On a related issue: I have asked this question before but never get any
answer.
Documentation states (from Data Spooling article):
While the spooled data is being
Hello,
Monday, September 10, 2007, 2:15:15 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
DL On 10 Sep 2007 at 1:10, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
Hello,
thank you that you finally admit there is a bug.
DL Well, that's certainly one way to get people to help you.
DL The rest of your post was well natured. But
On 10 Sep 2007 at 4:18, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
Hello,
Monday, September 10, 2007, 2:15:15 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
DL On 10 Sep 2007 at 1:10, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
Hello,
thank you that you finally admit there is a bug.
DL Well, that's certainly one way to get people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising
On Monday 10 September 2007 00:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kern,
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I have uploaded patches to bug #935 (bugs.bacula.org) that will correct
version 2.2.0, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2. The patch has been tested only on
version 2.2.2 and passes all regression
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in
Bacula.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files
are missing and thus not restored. This is really
32 matches
Mail list logo
