Hello,
I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system.
This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the
pool.
the job and file retention for the jobs are both of 1 month. The
Volume retention for all volumes in the
Auto reply :)
It appears I had orphaned jobs, jobmedia, file,filename and pathes
in my catalog.
I used dbcheck to get rid of all of them. The volume got pruned
and recycled properly afterwards.
Regards.
Le 01/09/2011 08:38, Alexandre
2011/9/1 Alexandre Chapellon a.chapel...@horoa.net
Hello,
I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system.
This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the pool.
the job and file retention for the jobs are both of 1 month. The Volume
retention for all
Le 01/09/2011 14:33, John Drescher a écrit :
2011/9/1 Alexandre Chapellon a.chapel...@horoa.net
mailto:a.chapel...@horoa.net
Hello,
I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system.
This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the
pool.
Hello
There are several storages defined in the bacula-dir.conf :
Storage {
Name = File1
Address = hostname# N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
SDPort = 9103
Password = ***
Device = FileStorage1
Media Type = File1
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20
}
Storage {
Name = File2
2009/10/29 Serge Vostroknutov s...@mastersoft.ru:
Hello
There are several storages defined in the bacula-dir.conf :
Storage {
Name = File1
Address = hostname # N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
SDPort = 9103
Password = ***
Device = FileStorage1
Media Type = File1
I'm having a problem with over-writing recycled volumes. I have my
jobs setup so that I retain file information for 90 days and job
retention for 6 months:
File Retention = 90 days# 90 days
Job Retention = 6 months# six months
And my catalog has:
Volume
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Dirk Kleinhesselink
dkle...@phy.ucsf.edu wrote:
I'm having a problem with over-writing recycled volumes. I have my
jobs setup so that I retain file information for 90 days and job
retention for 6 months:
File Retention = 90 days # 90 days
Job
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Dirk Kleinhesselink
dkle...@phy.ucsf.edu wrote:
I'm having a problem with over-writing recycled volumes. I have my
jobs setup so that I retain file information for 90 days and job
retention for 6 months:
File Retention = 90 days # 90 days
Job
Good morning
I am currently running bacula on a CentOS machine with no problems. I am
waiting to install a tape drive (problem sourcing the connector to the
server)
I am having a problem with clearing out data over a certain length of time.
I have had a look through FAQ's and also through
Hello,
On 5/11/2007 11:37 AM, luket wrote:
Good morning
I am currently running bacula on a CentOS machine with no problems. I am
waiting to install a tape drive (problem sourcing the connector to the
server)
I am having a problem with clearing out data over a certain length of time.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 04 August 2005 21:36, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Kern On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald
[EMAIL
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Kern On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Kern On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 02
On Thursday 04 August 2005 21:36, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Kern On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Kern On Tuesday
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Kern On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Rico it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 08:34:39 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Rico Martin Simmons wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:00:05 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Rico hi
Rico i have made a donothing-backup-job.
Rico then run donothing.
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Rico it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and
Rico recycled but thepig-job failed.
The output looks normal to me, except for when the sd says Cannot find any
appendable volumes. This could be a bug, so
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Rico it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and
Rico recycled but thepig-job failed.
The output looks normal to me, except for when the sd says
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Rico it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and
Rico recycled but thepig-job failed.
The output looks normal to me, except for
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:47, Rico wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Rico it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and
Rico recycled but thepig-job
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Kern On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Rico it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and
Rico
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Kern On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Rico it failed again.
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:00:05 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Rico hi
Rico i have made a donothing-backup-job.
Rico then run donothing.
Rico 29-Jul 10:23 pe2800oracle-dir: Start Backup JobId 477,
Rico Job=donothing.2005-07-29_10.23.49
hi
i have made a donothing-backup-job.
then run donothing.
29-Jul 10:23 pe2800oracle-dir: Start Backup JobId 477,
Job=donothing.2005-07-29_10.23.49
volumeretentionperiod is over. bacula pruned the current volume and
changed status to recycle. till here all right.
29-Jul 10:37
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:00:05 +0200, Rico [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Rico hi
Rico i have made a donothing-backup-job.
Rico then run donothing.
Rico 29-Jul 10:23 pe2800oracle-dir: Start Backup JobId 477,
Rico Job=donothing.2005-07-29_10.23.49
Rico volumeretentionperiod is over.
Hi MattB!
In the Bacula on-line manual
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html
you can find the recycling algorithm, that Bacula uses. I quote the
relevant part here too:
The full recycling algorithm that Bacula uses when it needs a new
Volume is:
* Search the
I'm having a tough time trying to get Bacula to recycle volumes
properly. I'm trying to backup a Windows server with a full backup on
Sunday and incrementals Monday to Saturday. Backup is to a removable
USB disk and I want the filenames to be automatically created in the
format ProductionVol001,
27 matches
Mail list logo