On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 09:33:13AM +0200, Hugo Letemplier wrote:
> > Hi thanks a lot for your answers
> >
> > I have retried with a new test scenario its clear now and deleting an
> > incremental is really dangerous.
> > But I think that a function th
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 09:33:13AM +0200, Hugo Letemplier wrote:
> Hi thanks a lot for your answers
>
> I have retried with a new test scenario its clear now and deleting an
> incremental is really dangerous.
> But I think that a function that enable the administrator to "join" 2 jobs
> would be
Hi thanks a lot for your answers
I have retried with a new test scenario its clear now and deleting an
incremental is really dangerous.
But I think that a function that enable the administrator to "join" 2 jobs
would be cool.
Imagine that one day lots of data manipulation are done on the machine
On 13.10.2010 18:21, Hugo Letemplier wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an important question that will help me validating some specs
> about bacula 5.0.2
> Imagine the following scenario:
> 1 - a full
> 2 - an incremental
> 3 - an incremental
> 4 - another incremental
>
> if I delete the incremental of step 3
On 10/13/10 11:21, Hugo Letemplier wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an important question that will help me validating some specs
> about bacula 5.0.2
> Imagine the following scenario:
> 1 - a full
> 2 - an incremental
> 3 - an incremental
> 4 - another incremental
>
> if I delete the incremental of step 3,
Hi,
I have an important question that will help me validating some specs
about bacula 5.0.2
Imagine the following scenario:
1 - a full
2 - an incremental
3 - an incremental
4 - another incremental
if I delete the incremental of step 3, does it move the files that
have been added during step "3" on