Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

Mind using the rebuilds from the Fedora packages? People have been using them for years now and seems to be happy: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/slaanesh/Bacula/ Please read the various README files. Upgrade from previous version (example the 5.0.0 version in RHEL 7) is still

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

Hi Ken, thanks for reply. I already solved my problem by adding "Provides: libbaccats-%{version}.so()(64bit)" to the "%if %{postgresql}" block. I used the spec file "./platforms/rpms/redhat/bacula.spec" which i got after executing "./configure --with-postgresql" in the hierarchy that is

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

Try using the .spec files that are released with Bacula 9.0.6 rather than the RedHat spec files.  If you are using the community .spec files, let me know and I will make sure that they are the same ones our packager is using (sometimes packagers modify packages but the changes don't always get

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

Am 2018-04-05 um 16:50 schrieb Matthias Leopold: Hi, I'm absolutely new to Bacula and basically only want to package the software for CentOS 7 so it can be used in my organization by others. I'm compiling RPMs from the spec files in bacula-9.0.6.tar.gz. I chose "%define postgresql 1" so i

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

On 04/05/2018 11:50 AM, Donna Hofmeister wrote: [systemd] > Unfortunately, it's something we'll have to get used to. At least for bacula-sd with ZFS storage, FreeBSD is looking better and better every day. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison --

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > FWIW I'm deploying more, or at least as many, new centos 6 installs, than > centos 7 ones. I've come to the conclusion that between systemd with its > service files and mount units and stuff, breaking kernel ABI on

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

On 2018-04-05 10:25, Donna Hofmeister wrote: Just to continue sniveling...I downloaded the *source* for bacula 7.4.7. While it compiled ok (I did have to install libacl-devel first), I'm pulling my hair out trying to get the service files created . FWIW I'm deploying more, or at least

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Leopold < matthias.leop...@meduniwien.ac.at> wrote: > > I'm absolutely new to Bacula and basically only want to package the > software for CentOS 7 so it can be used in my organization by others. I'm > compiling RPMs from the spec files in

[Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

Hi, I'm absolutely new to Bacula and basically only want to package the software for CentOS 7 so it can be used in my organization by others. I'm compiling RPMs from the spec files in bacula-9.0.6.tar.gz. I chose "%define postgresql 1" so i got a bacula-postgresql-9.0.6-1.x86_64.rpm package.