Does anyone know if bacula keeps track of tape soft errors? (Soft errors
being correctable errors that were corrected by the tape drive
hardware.)
I like to use the number of soft errors as an early warning indicator as
to tape failure.
I am currently using Veritas Backup Exec and it tracks total
On February 24, 2007 6:41 PM Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On 24 Feb 2007 at 17:58, Rex Wheeler wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know if bacula keeps track of tape soft errors? (Soft
errors
> > being correctable errors that were corrected by the tape drive
> > hardware.)
>
&
> From: Alan Brown
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:38 AM
>
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Rex Wheeler wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know what kind of errors that the "VolErrors" column
totals?
>
> Primarily write errors and database vs tape file number mismatc
I tried to get a tape drive working with the storage daemon on Windows
without success. Before I bang my head against the wall too much, I
wanted to ask if in general this works or not. I realize that the
Windows side of stuff is still "experimental".
I am running Windows 2003 Server that is up to
Thanks for the suggestion, but I already tried that. Btape does
successfully open the tape drive (it won't if bacula-sd is running.)
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:05 PM
> To: Rex Whee
lName :
VolFile : 0
LabelType : Unknown 0
LabelSize : 0
PoolName :
MediaType :
PoolType :
HostName :
Date label written: -4712-01-01 at 00:00
*
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
AlwaysOpen = yes
RemovableMedia = yes
RandomAccess = no
}
Messages {
Name = Standard
director = molerat-sd = all
}
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:49 AM
> To: Rex Wheeler; bacula-users@lists.source
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:09 AM
> To: Rex Wheeler; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Should tapes drives on windows work?
>
> There is one typo in your configuration; in the messages resource it
> should
> be molerat-d
0x10
DeCompType: 0x10
BOP: yes
Block Position: 0
ActivePartition: 0
EarlyWarningSize: 0
NumPartitions:0
MaxPartitions:0
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Debelius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:21 AM
> To: Rex Wheeler
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourc
ndicator lights up on the tape drive.) Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Rex
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Debelius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:49 AM
> To: Rex Wheeler
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Sh
My director is running on a linux box so I need the script to run on the
client.
Thanks though.
Rex
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon McLellan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 8:11 AM
> To: Rex Wheeler
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
I have 3 stand alone DLT drives (no changers.) I would like to define a
backup job that can treat these drives as a "pool" and span across them.
Is this possible?
The reason I want this is that I have a backup job that will not fit on
one tape. I would like to put a tape in each drive and have bac
I have a machine that has two DLT drives. While I can define a job to
run on either tape drive, I can not at run time alter an existing job to
run on the other tape drive. If I do try to alter the storage location
of a job (with the "mod" option of the "run" command), my request to use
a different
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 1:15 PM
> Hi,
>
> On 4/17/2007 9:58 PM, Rex Wheeler wrote:
> > I have a machine that has two DLT drives. While I can define a job
to
> > run on either tape drive, I can not at run time alter an existing
job to
> > run on the other ta
14 matches
Mail list logo
