Re: [Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage?
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:09:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:09:18 +0200 Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage? Ah, close. I saw that it is possible to use Storage=storage1 on the Run-line in Schedule. Thanks for pointer to correct section. The pools are not actually connected to a specific storage. I tried to use different pools with the result that the storage defined in Job-section waited for the correct volume to be mounted on just that storage. Problem solved with Storage= parameter in Schedule. /Aki I'm having the exact same problem, and using overrides in the schedules run statement like so: Run = Incremental Pool=Online01 Storage=online01 tue-sun This results in all volumes for incremental backups listed as *unknown*, although both the pool Online01 and storage online01 are defined and the pool has appendable volumes available. Full backups to the offline / tape pool are still correctly listed with their target volume names. Should I just hope for the best for this evening's incremental backup to the online01 pool or is there something wrong with my setup? Does your status dir also list volumes as unknown in this case? Cheers, uwe -- Uwe Schuerkamp, NIONEX GmbH (http://www.nionex.com/) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +49 (0)5241 / 80 10 66 FAX: / 806 23 38 Avenwedder Str. 55, D-33311 Guetersloh, Germany GnuPG KeyID: 5887047D, Fingerprint: 2E1320229A3F63 7F676FE9B1A836A461 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage?
Hi! I'm trying to figure out if it is possible to run a job where full backups are saved on one storage and incremental to an other (e.g. full to tape and inc to disk). I have created two jobs with different storages. This of course means that the incremental one will run a full backup on the storage instead of using the full from the first job (for only full backups). Is it possible to create one job which uses two (or more) different storages? Could you please help me with a simple job definition example for that? Is it as simple as defining storage = storage1, storage2 in the job definition? Any assistance is appreciated. /Aki - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage?
Maybe you can do this with just one job and let the sheduler overwrite the pool which is specified in the job resource? Run = Level=Full Pool=Fullpool 1st sat at 23:00 Run = Level=Incremental Pool=Incrpool mon-fri at 23:00 Greetings, User100 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. August 2006 15:37 An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: [Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage? Hi! I'm trying to figure out if it is possible to run a job where full backups are saved on one storage and incremental to an other (e.g. full to tape and inc to disk). I have created two jobs with different storages. This of course means that the incremental one will run a full backup on the storage instead of using the full from the first job (for only full backups). Is it possible to create one job which uses two (or more) different storages? Could you please help me with a simple job definition example for that? Is it as simple as defining storage = storage1, storage2 in the job definition? Any assistance is appreciated. /Aki -- --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057; dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage?
Ah, close. I saw that it is possible to use Storage=storage1 on the Run-line in Schedule. Thanks for pointer to correct section. The pools are not actually connected to a specific storage. I tried to use different pools with the result that the storage defined in Job-section waited for the correct volume to be mounted on just that storage. Problem solved with Storage= parameter in Schedule. /Aki -Original Message- From: User100 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 29 augusti 2006 16:38 To: Aki Mäntylä Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: AW: [Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage? Maybe you can do this with just one job and let the sheduler overwrite the pool which is specified in the job resource? Run = Level=Full Pool=Fullpool 1st sat at 23:00 Run = Level=Incremental Pool=Incrpool mon-fri at 23:00 Greetings, User100 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. August 2006 15:37 An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: [Bacula-users] Full incremental backups to different storage? Hi! I'm trying to figure out if it is possible to run a job where full backups are saved on one storage and incremental to an other (e.g. full to tape and inc to disk). I have created two jobs with different storages. This of course means that the incremental one will run a full backup on the storage instead of using the full from the first job (for only full backups). Is it possible to create one job which uses two (or more) different storages? Could you please help me with a simple job definition example for that? Is it as simple as defining storage = storage1, storage2 in the job definition? Any assistance is appreciated. /Aki -- --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057; dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
