Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:45:43PM +0100, Alan Brown wrote:
IE: double the network load.
In order to achieve bit-identical backups, one would need to snapshot the
filesystem before starting the backups and release the snapshot afterwards
(Assuming LVM or other
Hello,
I was wondering if it's possible to store full backups both to disk
and a tape library at the same time? I think I remember an example
somewhere in the bacula docs of how to set this up, but I cannot for
the life of me find it again.
Background: Currently we're running a seven-day cycle
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
From: Uwe Schuerkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bacula Users Mailing List bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:33:53 +0200
Subject: [Bacula-users] Backup up to tape AND disk at the same time
Hello,
I was
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:47:18AM -0400, Hristo Benev wrote:
From: Hristo Benev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Uwe Schuerkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bacula Users Mailing List bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:47:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Backup up to tape AND disk
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:27, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
From: Uwe Schuerkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bacula Users Mailing List bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:33:53 +0200
Subject: [Bacula-users]
Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:47:18AM -0400, Hristo Benev wrote:
From: Hristo Benev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Uwe Schuerkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bacula Users Mailing List bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:47:18 -0400
Subject: Re:
Please always copy the list.
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:09, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:08:45PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Yes, the run command was intended to clone jobs. However, the above seems
to
me to be lacking a few options so may not produce a true
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Do you know wether the clone method would run the same backup twice,
doubling both network and server load, or would the copy be cloned
locally on the backup server?
It runs two separate jobs, so the backups will be done at the same time each
