Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-06-03 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 06:10:36 +0100, Bernie Elbourn said: > > On 01/04/2020 16:10, Bernie Elbourn wrote: > > Oddly, jobs run sequentially as follows rather than duplicates being > > cancelled: > > > > Running Jobs: > > Console connected at 29-Mar-20 12:36 > >  JobId  Type Level Files

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-05-27 Thread Bernie Elbourn
On 01/04/2020 16:10, Bernie Elbourn wrote: Oddly, jobs run sequentially as follows rather than duplicates being cancelled: Running Jobs: Console connected at 29-Mar-20 12:36  JobId  Type Level Files Bytes  Name  Status

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-19 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 19/04/2020 20:49, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: [SNIP] For running jobs only that the running job with same level or higher will be abortet the running. For queued job it is ok, but for running job it should not start a new at same level. Better want to wait or want to cancel. If there is a way

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-19 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 03.04.20 um 04:58 schrieb Pierre Bernhardt: > I cannot see an error. By the way here my JobDefs configuration for my daily > jobs > which should work nearly as you expect: > > 34 JobDefs { > 35 Name = "RotateJob" > 36 Type = Backup > 37 Level = Incremental > 38 Schedule = "Cycle"

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-06 Thread Bernie Elbourn
On 03/04/2020 13:19, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: And the reason it doesn't get cancelled is because they are *not* identical jobs, one is "Differential" and the other is "Incremental." You need to run the Differential, Incremental, and Full jobs at different priorities - that reflect how you want

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-03 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 03.04.20 um 14:19 schrieb Gary R. Schmidt: > You need to run the Differential, Incremental, and Full jobs at different > priorities - that reflect how you want things done - and set "Cancel Lower > Level Duplicate = Yes" and "Allow Mixed Priority = Yes" in them all. Hi, that could not be

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-03 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 03/04/2020 19:38, Bernie Elbourn wrote: On 03/04/2020 03:58, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: It is exactly same job configured? A good thought but yes it is same simple job with no inherited defaults. Some extra detail this time using sed to reliably obfuscate :-) Running Jobs: Console

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-03 Thread Bernie Elbourn
On 03/04/2020 03:58, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: It is exactly same job configured? A good thought but yes it is same simple job with no inherited defaults. Some extra detail this time using sed to reliably obfuscate :-) Running Jobs: Console connected at 29-Mar-20 12:36  JobId  Type Level

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-02 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 01.04.20 um 17:41 schrieb Bernie Elbourn: > Oops... > > On 01/04/2020 16:10, Bernie Elbourn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Oddly, jobs run sequentially as follows rather than duplicates being >> cancelled: >> >> Running Jobs: >> Console connected at 29-Mar-20 12:36 >> JobId Type Level Files

Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

2020-04-01 Thread Bernie Elbourn
Oops... On 01/04/2020 16:10, Bernie Elbourn wrote: Hi, Oddly, jobs run sequentially as follows rather than duplicates being cancelled: Running Jobs: Console connected at 29-Mar-20 12:36  JobId  Type Level Files Bytes  Name  Status