Hi, Ahang,
At 01:18 PM 12/11/2003 -0500, you quoted:
He [Peter Khan] clearly dispelled the myth that the changes that the Five Year Plan
had brought represented principles that did not previously exist in the Faith. To
the contrary Dr Khan illustrated how the process of clustering, for
Marleen's original post caught my attention because I had been reciting the
Meditation and Prayer for two nights. Kazeh's examination is moving and
infused with spiritual meaning. Below, I offer what has struck me about
this last Prayer and Meditation CLXXXIV. The weightiness of the theme is
Dear Ahang,
I was struck by this:
Dr Khan identified four areas in particular that he felt the Baha¹i
community, complementary to its focus on the core lines of action, could
contribute to the spiritual and social rehabilitation of western society
Those four were as follows:
1. Building
As Dr. Khan was speaking specifically of western society and its need for
spiritual and social rehabilitation; he may have been calling upon the
worldwide Baha'i community (which may be doing much better in the four areas
he highlighted) to help the western societies.
Richard.
- Original
Has the House actually confirmed that the Remey design will be built?
Given that the Master and Guardian approved Remey and his design before
he broke the covenant, it would seem that the House would have grounds
to alter the decision. Does it seem credible or consistent that either
the
"Richard H. Gravelly" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, a Persian Baha'i answered my one question "How can one Prophet change the laws laid down by a succeeding Prophet?" He answered the question. I was ready to declare on the spot.
Just curious: What answer did he give?
Thanks,
Dave
'Abdu'l-Baha
permitted the covenant breaker to live at the mansion at Bahji, even
paying their expenses. In contrast, Shoghi Effendi could not wait to
get them out and bulldoze their shanty appendages. How do we view
Shoghi Effendi's actions in light of 'Abdu'l-Baha's?
It's my view
