Re: All religions are one

2003-12-12 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Richard, At 08:40 PM 12/12/2003 -0800, you wrote: I cannot find anything in Ocean that gives All religions are one as a statement of the Faith. I did find fundamental oneness of religion in this statement by Shoghi Effendi. IMO, that is the basically the same as saying that religions have

Re: All religions are one

2003-12-11 Thread Dave Lambert
"Richard H. Gravelly" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Finally, a Persian Baha'i answered my one question "How can one Prophet change the laws laid down by a succeeding Prophet?" He answered the question. I was ready to declare on the spot. Just curious: What answer did he give? Thanks, Dave

All Religions are One

2003-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
I just posted the following on the interfaith Study Circle list: I think that the unqualified statement, All religions are one, is ludicrous on the face of it. However, if the statement can be broken down, it might be more manageable: 1. What is included by all? 2. What is our present

RE: All Religions are One

2003-12-10 Thread Brill de Ramirez, Susan
Mark, In Native Studies, there is far less difficulty in understanding the notion of all religions being one. There's a story by Native writer Anna Lee Walters (Otoe-Missouria/Pawnee) in which various preachers try to explain to an older Native woman that their respective churches are the only

RE: All Religions are One

2003-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
recognition of truth. However, I don't think that makes the unqualified statement, All religions are one, any less ludicrous. IMO, there is little sense in having an academic discussion about religion or religions per se. These words are, or should be, far too general to be empirically useful

Re: All religions are one

2003-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Richard, At 11:41 AM 12/10/2003 -0800, you wrote: I am not certain that a reasonable person would or should offer to refute such a proposition before asking for an explanation of its meaning. Although, I must say, as Americans can be rather contentious at times, one should be prepared to offer

Re: All religions are one

2003-12-10 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
- Original Message - From: "Mark A. Foster" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Baha'i Studies" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:50 AM Subject: Re: All religions are one Richard, At 11:41 AM 12/10/2003 -0800, you wrote: I am not certain that a

Re: All religions are one

2003-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Richard, At 01:00 PM 12/10/2003 -0800, you wrote: Or at the very least, explain its meaning, as you very competently did. Thanks, or at least my understanding of it. Mark A. Foster * http://MarkFoster.net http://CompuServe.m.foster.name -- You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as:

Re: All Religions are One

2003-12-10 Thread john ludgate
Title: Re: All Religions are One Hello Mark, I think that as Bahais we reflect on lots of One's (especially the oneness of man, religion and God). While science and religion are two wings of man, the logician may have trouble jumping into the mystical ocean. I and the father are one. What can

Re: All Religions are One

2003-12-10 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, John, At 11:25 AM 12/10/2003 -1100, you wrote: While science and religion are two wings of man, the logician may have trouble jumping into the mystical ocean. I and the father are one. What can this mean? We may or may not have the fuller context for that statement. However, Jesus admitted