Le mercredi 18 février 2009 à 01:11 -0500, Chris Frey a écrit :
> > Moreover, I have splitted the C functions connect, disconnect,
> > get_changes... to get a source code cleaner.
>
> This appears at first glance to cause a lot of unneeded code duplication.
> Some of these are small functions, suc
Thanks for the info; I'll check some of this.
However, I did get it working last night, by making the various updates
manually:
- routing table
- nameservers in resolv.conf
I was losing my connection because during testing the pppob processes
weren't going away and I found multiples of them. Once
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:57:47 -0600, Andy Herkey wrote:
> Shannon McMackin wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:38:43 -0600, Andy Herkey wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Shannon McMackin wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:06:35 -0600, Andy Herkey wrote:
> Shannon McMackin wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Andy Herkey wrote:
> It is pppd that manages the connection and not the barry code. If there
> is a default route already pppd will not replace it. Some distro's
> modify pppd and have an added option "replacedefaultroute" to update the
> default route. I don't be
I have just updated the patch.
Regards,
Nicolas
Le mercredi 18 février 2009 à 01:11 -0500, Chris Frey a écrit :
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thanks for the new patch! I have some concerns though:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:16:06PM +0100, Nicolas wrote:
> > Moreover, I have splitted the C function
Adding the reset back in only sort of helped...
It made btool function properly, but the sync process just hangs with
the process stuck in osengine_sync_and_block, two threads waiting and
stuck in a kernel function.
This stuff looks like it's all been encountered in the past. There are
messages
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:55:48PM +0100, Nicolas wrote:
> I have just updated the patch.
Thanks! Applied, except for ChangeLog entry, which I moved to ChangLog.osync
while it's in another branch, to avoid rebase conflicts.
I've rebased the opensync-0.4x branch onto master as well.
I'm thinking
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Josh Kropf wrote:
> You already have most of these already, here is a list of the ones that
> need to be added to the archive:
>
> - deviceinfo.usb.gz
> - deviceinfo.txt
> - save-large.usb.gz
> - save-very-large.usb.gz
> - eventlog-with-exception.usb.gz
>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:32:17PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> Is this a timing problem?
>
> Consistently on my x86_64 (Intrepid) box, btool -t works.
>
> On my i686 (32bit) Jaunty Laptop I can get btool to run under GDB after
> plugging the device in, but can never get it to run outside of GDB
Shannon McMackin wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:57:47 -0600, Andy Herkey wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Shannon,
>> These are the active options in your file. asyncmap 0
>> noauth
>> crtscts
>> lock
>> hide-password
>> modem
>> proxyarp
>> lcp-echo-interval 30
>> lcp-echo-failure 4
>> noipx
>>
>>
>> Try maki
Answering backwards:
For the reset, I was speaking of this set of lines I found commented out
in probe.cc. When I put them back in, btool began the work for my 8330
on my Jaunty laptop. I later found that opensync would not complete
however, so suspect resetting the device in the midst of a sync
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:34:36PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> I can't reproduce the behavior in the debugger because it
> always works under gdb!
What kernel version are you using? And is it possible to try a different
kernel as a test?
There was a recent issue on 2.6.28 kernels that caused a
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:45:29 -0600, Andy Herkey wrote:
> Shannon McMackin wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:57:47 -0600, Andy Herkey wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Shannon,
>>> These are the active options in your file. asyncmap 0 noauth
>>> crtscts
>>> lock
>>> hide-password
>>> modem
>>> proxyarp
>>> lcp
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 05:06:10AM +, Shannon McMackin wrote:
> No luck with options file set with only 4 options. Seems most of these
> are getting pulled from the stock peers file.
I'm sure Andy Herkey has a plan, and this email is not meant to interfere
with that. :-) I just need some ba
Chris,
Before I posted the last reply, I considered removing all the quoted
text. Don't know why I didn't.
Back in December, Andy tweaked libbarry for me to get the AT&T 9000
working on Ubuntu 8.10. I then tried FC10. No go. At work I
participate in development (end-user testing) for linux
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:10:05PM -0600, Dave Booth wrote:
> Fedora doesnt modify pppd, it tweaks the ifup-ppp script to save and
> remove any existing default route if the defaultroute option is
> specified in the interfaces config file. On fedora if you dont use
> their ifup scripts you'll get e
I'm on 2.6.28-8.23. I also have 2.6.28-7.20 and 2.6.27-11.27 sitting on
the machine. Tests with 2.6.28-7.20 kernel are identical to the
2.6.28-8.23 version.
Tests with 2.6.27-11.27 work correctly for btool. I tried
msynctool/opensync using the 2.6.27-11.27 kernel and of course that
worked as it s
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:49:20AM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> I'm on 2.6.28-8.23. I also have 2.6.28-7.20 and 2.6.27-11.27 sitting on
> the machine. Tests with 2.6.28-7.20 kernel are identical to the
> 2.6.28-8.23 version.
>
> Tests with 2.6.27-11.27 work correctly for btool. I tried
> msynctoo
Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 05:06:10AM +, Shannon McMackin wrote:
>> No luck with options file set with only 4 options. Seems most of these
>> are getting pulled from the stock peers file.
>
> I'm sure Andy Herkey has a plan, and this email is not meant to interfere
> with th
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 06:22:00AM -0500, Shannon McMackin wrote:
> I'm connected in XP now. Unfortunately, I'm using the AT&T
> Communication Manager 6.09.0115.0 and there's no fruitful configuration
> info at all.
While it's running, does it create an entry in Control Panel's Network area?
-
Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 06:22:00AM -0500, Shannon McMackin wrote:
>
>> I'm connected in XP now. Unfortunately, I'm using the AT&T
>> Communication Manager 6.09.0115.0 and there's no fruitful configuration
>> info at all.
>>
>
> While it's running, does it create an en
21 matches
Mail list logo
