Re: Possible bug with bbdb-annotate-message-sender

2001-04-08 Thread Paul Franklin
On 7 Apr 2001, Jack Twilley wrote: > > "Andrew" == Andrew J Cosgriff writes: > > Jack> Now, I know there's a way to set bbdb such that I don't get > Jack> asked any more about djb@*.scream.org if I set net to > Jack> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I can't see how. That's not the bug, > Jack> althou

Re: Possible bug with bbdb-annotate-message-sender

2001-04-08 Thread WJCarpenter
Jack> Now, I know there's a way to set bbdb such that I don't get Jack> asked any more about djb@*.scream.org if I set net to Jack> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I can't see how. That's not the bug, Jack> although if someone would like to mention how, I'd really Jack> appreciate it. Since you already ha

Re: Possible bug with bbdb-annotate-message-sender

2001-04-08 Thread Nix
On 07 Apr 2001, Jack Twilley yowled: > One of the posters to one of my favorite newsgroups has an annoying > approach to antispam. Here's his bbdb record: > > Dan Birchall > net: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL

Re: Possible bug with bbdb-annotate-message-sender

2001-04-08 Thread Ronan Waide
On April 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Dan Birchall > net: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > creation-date: 27 Mar 2001 > timestamp: 27 Mar 2001 > newsgroups: alt.sysadmi