On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 11:47:26, Mats Lidell wrote:
> > Robert wrote:
>
> Robert> Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
> Robert> break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
> Robert> record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
>
> Isn't is possib
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003 at 07:43:48, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> I wish when I do (bbdb "bob") it would put the cursor in the bbdb
> window, as my next step is to type m on the person I want. It takes
> an extra C-x o at present.
Depends on your usage, so please some more votes before we
may decide to
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003 at 07:40:11, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> I wish there was a variable to control when I hit m, instead of
> causing To: Blob Dwobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it would make just To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], to be in line with my spartan image.
Modify the net field entry to be one of the f
On Friday, July 25, 2003 at 17:08:41, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
> >>>>> "RF" == Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RF> On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 15:00:51, Robert P. Goldman
> RF> wrote:
> >> The following defun in
On Thursday, July 24, 2003 at 16:25:44, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
> > break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
> > record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
> >
> > So have a look
On Thursday, July 24, 2003 at 12:01:17, Robert Widhopf wrote:
> On Monday, June 23, 2003 at 20:20:46, Marcus Frings wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > some people use in their FROM for Usenet postings the address
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which is just a spamtrap for moving messages to
> > /dev/null. Of cour
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 15:00:51, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
>
> The following defun in bbdb-sc.el seems buggy:
>
> (defun bbdb/sc-consult-attr (from)
> "Extract citing information from BBDB using sc-consult where
> FROM is user e-mail address to look for in BBDB."
> ;; if logged in user
On Monday, June 23, 2003 at 20:20:46, Marcus Frings wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some people use in their FROM for Usenet postings the address
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which is just a spamtrap for moving messages to
> /dev/null. Of course I don't want to have these addresses as records
> in my BBDB. Therefore
On Monday, July 21, 2003 at 19:25:08, Neil W. Van Dyke wrote:
>
> BBDB Version: 2.35 as packaged by Debian
> Emacs/XEmacs Version: GNU Emacs 21.3
> Mail/News reader (Gnus, VM, etc) used: 7.17
> Bug Description:
>
> While paging through email messages in VM, `bbdb-update-records'
> raises an error
On Monday, July 21, 2003 at 18:50:24, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> Whenever I delete a record in the database, I get the appended
> message when I view another MH message.
>
> I display the database by `M-x bbdb RET RET' I navigate to the
> appropriate record with successive `n' and then I type `
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 22:29:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On July 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Actually not, as they get called from bbdb-update-records
> > and that one cares for slightly different parameters, i.e.
> > promt-for-create is set to bbdb-prompt-for-create ...
>
> Ah. The reaso
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 17:22:37, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On July 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 08:04:10, Vladimir G. Ivanovic
> > wrote:
> > > Robert,
> > >
> > > Works for me! Many thanks.
> >
> > Great, I'll commit that.
>
> Thanks for the fix, Robert, I'm
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 at 08:04:10, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Works for me! Many thanks.
Great, I'll commit that.
> And now, a plea to backport the VM & gnus enhancements to
> MH-E. Please.
> ;-)
Sorry, I don't have the time to setup MH (a creature I do
not no) in order to
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003 at 10:33:53, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
> I set manually setq bbdb/mail-auto-create-p to 'prompt (the symbol),
> but it still didn't prompt. (I had used customize before.) I also
> tried 'bbdb-prompt-for-create and 'prompt-for-create but they too
> acted like
> t.
>
> T
On Friday, July 11, 2003 at 12:39:09, Ted Stern wrote:
> When reading a mailing list in CVS Gnus via Gmane
> (gmane.comp.tex.pdftex), I run into some problems when I display an
> article written by somebody who is already in my .bbdb file. That's
> because this gmane group has settings to automati
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 at 21:50:08, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Robert Fenk writes:
> > On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 at 13:38:13, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> [...]
> > I just made a commit allowing `bbdb-user-menu-commands' to
> > point to a function (this variable has been t
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 at 13:38:13, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using bbdb in combination with vm, and have an additional entry
> of the form vm-folder, so my bbdb entries look like:
> say:
>
> Robert Fenk
> net: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mai
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 at 13:38:13, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using bbdb in combination with vm, and have an additional entry
> of the form vm-folder, so my bbdb entries look like:
> say:
>
> Robert Fenk
> net: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mai
On , June 19, 2003 at 13:40:07, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
> [Sorry if you have already seen this in gnu.emacs.gnus ... I
> probably
> should have just posted here originally. I still can't get M-
> to cycle through multiple matches! -khj]
[...]
> reiner> Works for me ... BBDB version 2.35 ($Date:
On Monday, June 16, 2003 at 14:32:21, Marc Tamsky wrote:
> recipe for bug:
>
> M-x bbdb RET
> (enter a regexp search which returns a single name) RET
> C-x C-t (thinking I was on a line with a phone number)
>
> Instead of barfing, it locked up, causing xemacs to lockup in a busy
> loop. quit key
On Thursday, March 13, 2003 at 16:25:58, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On March 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Something in the most recent CVS changes have resulted in my
> > *BBDB* window popping up twice. I have *BBDB* pop up in a
> > separate frame via special-display. However since a CVS update on
>
On Monday, March 3, 2003 at 15:58:17, Stefan Reichör wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use bbdb from cvs. I want to append the new search results to the
> already displayed bbdb records.
>
> I type:
> b search-string1
> + b search-string2
>
> But the second search always clears the first one and I get only th
On Thursday, February 20, 2003 at 17:18:30, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just downloaded the 2.35 version, for Xemacs-21.4.12, vm 7.08, and
> ognus-007. The good thing is that now, bbdb/vm-show-all-recipients
> works correctly and adds all new address of an incoming mail to my
> bbdb, includin
On Monday, February 17, 2003 at 12:28:29, Ami Fischman wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My emacs usage patterns are USA-based: I never use accented
> characters, "foreign" (non-american) alphabets, etc. However, BBDB
> (with Gnus) keeps track of things like that (german "beta", accents,
> etc). If I try t
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002 at 10:50:01, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On November 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I had a hard time finding (bbdb-record-cache), maybe Waider
> > has more insight to this code and why a nil slips into the
> > bbdb-message-cache. :)
>
> It's heavy voodoo involving macro
On Thursday, November 7, 2002 at 07:19:46, Eric Ding wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> sure! Here ya go... let me know if there's any other info/debugging
> I can provide.
It looks like a problem with caching, could you try running
with
(setq bbdb-message-caching-enabled nil)
I had a hard time fi
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002 at 16:52:43, Eric Ding wrote:
> I'm using bbdb with MH-E. I have bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist
> set as follows:
>
> (setq bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist
> '(("From" . "mailer-daemon\\|root@\\|-owner\\|-admin")
> ("To" . "fvwm-announce\\|ascvb-list")
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 at 11:07:05, Niklas Morberg wrote:
> Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just wondering, which version of XEmacs are you using?
>
> I'm using Gnu Emacs:
>
> GNU Emacs 21.2.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.0.2195) of 2002-03-26 on PCNI
On Friday, October 25, 2002 at 20:10:29, Patrick Campbell-Preston
wrote:
[...]
> My next tweak will probably be to write a filter function which
> chooses one 'most useful' phone number or address to display in the
> one line layout.
>
> My only quibble with the design is that the 'filter' approa
On Friday, October 25, 2002 at 15:51:57, Robert Fenk wrote:
[...]
> > I haven't found out how (again, short of hacking the layout
> > functions) to get back the blank line which used to be between
> > each multi-line record in the BBDB buffer. Could this be
> > impl
On Friday, October 25, 2002 at 10:47:58, Patrick Campbell-Preston
wrote:
>
> A year and a while ago, Robert Fenk dripped support for multiple
> display layouts onto the bleeding edge of BBDB. At the time, he
> said:
>
> > The old variables bbdb-elided-display and
> >
On Thursday, October 24, 2002 at 10:56:43, Niklas Morberg wrote:
> When I press `C-o' and then enter `phone' to enter a new
> phone field, BBDB defaults to "Home" as the location.
>
> Is it possible to have BBDB say something else instead by
> default? Almost all phone numbers I enter are people's
On Friday, September 6, 2002 at 14:46:30, Jason Haslup wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm using bbdb with vm and specifically
> bbdb/vm-set-auto-folder-alist. I'd like to set the vm-folder field
> for one of my contacts to execute a function that I've defined. The
> documentation for bbdb/vm-set-auto-f
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002 at 13:35:13, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I sometimes get mail from address like this
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> however when applying bbdb/vm-show-sender (which is not case sensitive)
> it is stored like
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMail-addresses are case insensitive and what
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002 at 18:37:11, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
> I used bbdb/vm-show-all-recipients for a while, now only the first
> recipient of say a To, CC or BCC is annoted. The same happens to
> bbdb/gnus-show-all-recipients the only function whichworks as
> expected is
On Monday, July 22, 2002 at 09:32:50, Niklas Morberg wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bjørn-Helge Mevik) writes:
>
> > Many people have several email addresses, for instance one for work
> > mail and one for private mail. I would like an easy way of choosing
> > which one to expand to when I'm sendin
On , June 11, 2002 at 19:37:49, Thomas Reuben wrote:
> I've reported these typos before; one other which I reported at the
> same time was fixed, but as of 2.34, not the others:
>
> fist -> first
> parsed -> passed
> "do his own tweaks" What does this mean?
>
> The paragraph in which these three
On Monday, May 13, 2002 at 21:15:31, Andras BALI wrote:
[...]
> I have a record, with the name "Joe Foo", email "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Now I
> get a message from him, which has the following From field:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> BBDB correctly recognizes that the email address is "[EMAIL PR
On , April 30, 2002 at 17:25:42, Aldo Valente wrote:
[...]
> M-d made only strange noise (no touchtone, it rather sounds like
> errorbeeps), and i couldn't do "M-x bbdb-sound-player", or was it "M-x
> bbdb-dial"?
Probably M-x bbdb-dial-number?
Please ensure you have set bbdb-sound-files correctl
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002 at 15:39:18, Fabien Penso wrote:
[...]
> Hmm my example was a bad one. In fact I was talking about the name of
> the person. When he used a name in the From: field of the message which
> differs from the one I got in my bbdb, bbdb keeps asking me if I want to
> change it
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002 at 12:43:00, Robert Fenk wrote:
[...]
> > I just need a function which starts an external Script when i press
> > M-d.
>
> What has changed is that if native sound support is present,
> as in XEmacs, then the native sound system is used.
I fix
On Monday, April 29, 2002 at 20:32:06, Aldo Valente wrote:
> Long time ago i used bbdb-sound-player to start my own dial script. I
> remember that i even cut out all area code stuff. Now it's gone.
No, it is still there, so what do you mean by gone?
C-h v bbdb-sound-player:
`bbdb-sound-player'
On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 18:23:17, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Im using bbdb from CVS where latest Changelog entry is from 2002-03-20.
>
> ---++--
> On Debian Bugreport says the same i do, with this Info:
>
> Signaling: (wrong-number-of-arguments bbdb-insert-new-field 2)
> bbdb-insert-new-fie
On , April 18, 2002 at 11:45:42, David Kågedal wrote:
> > if I call bbdb/gnus-show-all-recipients in the Gnus summary buffer
> > only the first entry of the To field is shown. If I switch to the
> > Article buffer and call bbdb-show-all-recipients it works as expected
> > and really shows all To
On , April 11, 2002 at 09:42:36, D. Goel wrote:
> my bbdb-version
> "2.32"
> (i have commented in past that "e" edits the wrong field if our fields
> happen to be multiline..)
Try the current CVS version, it should be fixed there.
> create a new field .. when it asks for address-description, typ
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002 at 09:01:46, Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote:
> I would like to keep my Yahoo Address Book and the BBDB in sync. Has
> anyone have any pointers to utilities that can do this? Yahoo Address
> Book can export and import a CSV file. I looked at bbdb-pilot-jwz.el
> from Noah Fri
On , March 18, 2002 at 10:13:17, Doug Alcorn wrote:
[...]
> Is there some way I can globally limit the bbdb buffer to
> never taking more than X number of lines?
>
> I see bbdb-pop-up-target-lines which says it's supposed to
> be the "desired number of lines" in a pop-up window.
> However, it's n
On Friday, March 15, 2002 at 06:08:28, Albert Max Lai wrote:
> What I would like to do is to modify bbdb in such a way that addresses
> are automatically added only when the mail buffer name in vm matches a
> particular string (e.g. INBOX). This is similar to but different than
> what bbdb-ignore
On Thursday, March 14, 2002 at 16:30:36, Jack Twilley wrote:
[...]
> I've forgotten how to hide certain fields from display. I'd love to
> make "pilot-id" go away. Can someone tell me what I need to tweak?
It just works with recent BBDB versions. Try
M-x customize-variable bbdb-display-layou
On Wednesday, March 6, 2002 at 06:48:35, John F. Whitehead wrote:
> i found a bug in bbdb 2.34. i presume this only can happen if you have
> minibuffer-max-depth set to nil (or something else != 1). how i did it:
>
> - i called up a record, did bbdb-insert-new-field, and started entering it
>
On Thursday, February 7, 2002 at 14:26:08, Tommi Raita-aho wrote:
> I do not know if this a bug or only feature I don't like. But I have
> bbdb-pop-up-target-lines 5 (as it is default) it works fine whan I
> read meil in VM. But when I want send mail using completion, the pop
> up BBDB buffer is a
On , March 12, 2002 at 10:43:22, ET wrote:
> SUMMARY OF PROBLEM: completion does not work when name and
> email address are the same and when using primary-or-name.
[...]
Should work with the current CVS version now.
Bye Robert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, March 12, 2002 at 14:23:28, Matthieu Moy wrote:
[...]
> My father has a From: Field like this : "MOY, Jean-Pierre"
> . When I make a reply, I have the same To: field.
See the function bbdb-get-addresses as used in bbdb-vm and
bbdb-gnus ... or the bbdb-extract-address-comp
On Monday, March 11, 2002 at 16:17:26, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> When trying to byte compile bbdb2.34 under xemcs-21.1.14 no mule
[...]
> Library is file /usr/local/share/emacs/19.34/lisp/mailabbrev.elc
Just to be sure about that: You are not sharing ELC files
between GNU and XEmacs, aren't you? IMHO
On Monday, February 11, 2002 at 21:03:42, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I am using xemacs-21.1.14 no mule, and upgraded from bbdb-2.32 to
> bbdb.2.34, first of all I found a bug which I cannot submit via
> bbdb-submit-bug-report. I attach the error trace of the submit but
> (via debug-on-error t):
>
> The
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 10:06:32, Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote:
> When I use bbdb-show-all-recipients in a VM message (I am using 6.98,
> the error seems to happen with 7.01 also), I get the following error.
You might also use "C-u :" (bbdb/vm-show-sender) in your VM
buffer, does that work?
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 10:06:32, Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote:
> When I use bbdb-show-all-recipients in a VM message (I am using 6.98,
> the error seems to happen with 7.01 also), I get the following error.
Try running without ELC files. Does that help?
Bye Robert
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002 at 11:34:38, Nicolas Kowalski wrote:
[...]
> However, I was searching for something doing as you wrote, but in
> `batch' mode, I mean without the user intervention : BBDB asks me "Do
> you want to delete..." for each record. This is boring because my
> databaseis becom
On Friday, January 11, 2002 at 12:57:43, Nicolas Kowalski wrote:
> Is there a way to remove fields (such as face, mailer, etc.) of all
> records in a BBDB database ?
Short version: / .* RET T down+ * d y RET
Long version: Display all records in your *BBDB* buffer,
place the cursor on the field
On , January 20, 2002 at 17:50:02, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> BBDB 2.32 GNU Emacs 20.7 Debian 2.2 (potato)
>
> Short story: Loading bbdb before cl can break code that uses cl's
> `mapc'.
Wiht the current development version this should not happen
anymore.
Bye Robert
_
On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 08:49:38, Niklas Morberg wrote:
[...]
> I've tried all of the above, but to no avail. I've trimmed
> down my bbdb to a minimal file which fails here and attached
> it to this email. There seems to be some encoding issue, but
> I have no idea what the cause is (or how
On , January 21, 2002 at 16:02:11, Thomas Gerds wrote:
[...]
> 1. do i miss something here or is it really that simple: just changing
> the two variables bbdb-file and bbdb-buffer?
Never tried this.
> has bbdb already a feature that deals with multiple bbdb
> files?
No
> 2. with gnus i want t
On Wednesday, January 23, 2002 at 17:57:11, "Ola Fredin wrote:
> I'm currently using vm 7.01 under GNU Emacs 20.X. I have trouble getting the
> latest version of bbdb to cooperate with vm. As soon as I add
> (bbdb-insinuate-vm) into my .vm file vm stops working. I get various error
> messages, the
On Tuesday, January 22, 2002 at 01:52:01, Alex Schroeder wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Aichner) writes:
>
> > Why not make a C-u prefix invert the sense of the search to find
> > records not matching regexp?
>
> If you look at the source, you'll see that the prefix is used for
> something e
On , January 21, 2002 at 17:41:12, Sergei Pokrovsky wrote:
> Is there anything for psion/revo handheld synchronization (or even
> simplex transfer)? Or, maybe, via M$ Offiice or Lotus?
AFAIK only for Palm.
But you may use the following function to export some part
of your BBDB to a "comma separ
On Monday, January 21, 2002 at 11:08:59, Ronan Waide wrote:
[...]
> Regarding speed, well, it's still an issue if I go pruning my BBDB -
> wherein I display the 500-odd records and then go through them deleting
> ones that are spam-generated or whatever.
This should be fixed in CVS.
I did some
On Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 20:32:08, Galen Boyer wrote:
> If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
> make the visible records remain while I search for a different
> string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
> records from the anchored buffer and the "ju
On Friday, January 18, 2002 at 13:42:27, Alex Schroeder wrote:
[...]
> Heh. I can't remember contributing any towards it, I assume you meant
> somebody else. I have something to discuss, though: The "Extents
> vs. Overlays unhappiness" and the slow display of many overlapping
> overlays in Emacs
On , January 12, 2002 at 10:11:38, Jochen Küpper wrote:
[...]
> I am not sure, but it seems to me that autoloads are more desireable,
> 'cause then we defer the possible need/availability check to runtime.
But you would not get meaningful compile errors and when you
use macros it becomes even wor
On Saturday, January 12, 2002 at 14:04:44, Alex Schroeder wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Finnefrock) writes:
>
> > Is it a crime to have a BBDB entry without a net field? :)
> > Seriously, should I put in bogus e-mail addresses for these records?
>
> No, I have dozens of entries without e-
On Thursday, January 10, 2002 at 10:34:09, Chris Beggy wrote:
[...]
> I think that I have gotten errors like this, in reading the .bbdb
> file, when I have snarfed records with "face" in the buffer.
We had a report on similar problems before.
As far as I remember you have to edit .bbdb
by hand an
On , January 9, 2002 at 23:34:01, Galen Boyer wrote:
> I am continually getting the following type of message.
>
> Invalid face text property value: red [12 times]
Hmm, I think there is no face in BBDB which is red unless you
defined/changed one yourself. Have you made any changes to the
config/
On , January 8, 2002 at 23:38:14, Galen Boyer wrote:
> If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
> make the visible records remain while I search for a different
> string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
> records from the anchored buffer and the "just found
On , December 28, 2001 at 18:54:13, Jack Vinson wrote:
> 1. I thought BBDB used to be able to understand that "Vinson, Jack" was the
>same as "Jack Vinson." However, with this version it is not able to
This will be fixed in the next release, until then with
(setq bbdb-extract-address-compo
On Thursday, January 3, 2002 at 11:36:17, Steve Youngs wrote:
[...]
> BBDB notices things in the gnus-article-buffer where the unseen headers
> don't exist so it can't notice changes. The headers aren't really
> hidden at all, they just aren't there.
[...]
> How close am I to getting that right,
On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 17:41:14, Steve Youngs wrote:
> Hey Folks!
>
> I finally got sick of BBDB not noticing things in hidden headers (like
> X-Face's), so I wrote this horrible little hack:
[...]
> The downside is that, OMG it's so slow. :-( Does anyone have a better way
> to do this
On , October 4 2001 22:15:18, Gustavo Leite de Mendonça Chaves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to fetch the latest bbdb tar-ball from
> http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/ following the link to
> http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/bbdb-2.32.tar.gz but it seems to be broken.
> I was able to fetch it from
> http://bb
On Tuesday, September 25 2001 15:51:00, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote:
[...]
> The problem arises when sending mail using M-x vm-mail. It also occurs
> in M-x mail (perhaps because vm-mail - as I understand it - is merely
> a spruced up version of M-x mail). I have the following bbdb record in
> my dat
On Friday, September 21 2001 12:50:31, Patrick Campbell-Preston wrote:
[...]
> There isn't really much alternative anymore. The choice seems to be
> either bleeding edge, or dulled rusty edge encrusted with dried blood;
> when did we last have an actual 'release' which wasn't broken in at
> least
On , September 21 2001 12:26:26, Thomas Gerds wrote:
> can anyone send me a (www-location) of the code of robert
> fenk`s on omitting and sorting fields ...
Follow the instructions on checking out the CVS tree
http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
But be aware that you will live on the bleedin
On , September 5 2001 13:42:10, Doug Alcorn wrote:
[...]
> > > The current setup seems to generate a lot more complaints,
> > > plus it's buggy in that the hook functions don't get an
> > > indication of whether the current record is From, To, Cc,
> > > or something else.
> >
> > Of what use woul
On , September 17 2001 12:03:01, Niklas Morberg wrote:
[...]
> The problem occurs when I want to use BBDB alias in combination
> with this. Adding the following line to my .emacs breaks the
> local-abbrev-table (C-h v in message-mode now tells me that
> local-abbrev-table is nil in buffer *mail*).
On Monday, September 10 2001 13:56:48, Mark Moll wrote:
> In the latest cvs version of bbdb, bbdb-print is broken because
> bbdb-field-shown-p is undefined. A related ChangeLog entry is
This should be fixed in the current CVS verrsion.
Robert
___
[EM
On , September 11 2001 12:11:43, Mats Lidell wrote:
> What happens is that not only the sender is noticed but also other
> recipients as well. I thought that was a nice feature until I noticed
> that for example the organization field was updated for the other
> recipients as well. Yes I have bbdb
On , September 5 2001 13:42:10, Doug Alcorn wrote:
[...]
> The bbdb-auto-notes-hook was taking stuff like
> Organization and adding it to all the recipients as well
> as the sender. I use this as my alist:
Autsch, ok now I see it. Have never used it like that
before so I missed this bug, hmm I'
On Wednesday, September 5 2001 17:39:30, Waider wrote:
[...]
> Actually, the original behaviour was to only show the From: record;
At least not for VM/Gnus. bbdb-vm used to take the To:
header if there was no or an uninteresting From header.
You are right in a sense, since now it has more fallb
On , September 5 2001 11:54:21, Doug Alcorn wrote:
[...]
> Is this the best way to address this? I noticed the variable
> bbdb-get-only-first-address-p. Would it have been better to leave
> bbdb-get-addresses-header alone and just set b-g-o-f-a-p to t instead
> of nil?
Yes this is the way it wa
On Thursday, August 30 2001 07:56:48, Thomas E Deweese wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>I recently upgraded my bbdb to 2.32, and I noticed a significant
> lossage for me. In Kodak we have wonderful e-mail addresses like:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I had written a bbdb-create-hook that
> would query our LDAP
On Tuesday, September 4 2001 00:29:09, Alex Schroeder wrote:
[...]
> I am really starting to like this!
:) Well it still needs a helping hand ...
> One question: The default value here contains "phones" instead of
> "phone" -- does that work?
Yes, since it maps to a function bbdb-record- in
Hi,
I have just committed a rewritten version of the
bbdb-format-record-* functions.
The "look&feel" of the different layouts and be configured
by the variables bbdb-display-layout-alist, which lists
options for the specific layout, e.g. field order, omited
fields, toggeling,... and the variable
On , August 7 2001 09:45:48, Doug Alcorn wrote:
[...]
> '(bbdb-display-list
> '((net . t)
> (phone . t)
> (address . (multi-line full))
> (attribution . (one-line))
> (pilot-id. (full))
> (t
On Wednesday, August 8 2001 17:03:07, Sean Rima wrote:
[...]
> That brings up more errors :
Seems that your MEW code is a bit out of date,
i.e. it was written for a older version of BBDB.
Robert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lis
On Tuesday, August 7 2001 08:19:53, Thomas E Deweese wrote:
[...]
> There are minor functionality changes, that may or may not warrent
> a name change, but 'better naming' _is_ just changing names for the
> sake of changing names.
Well, we could argue on this for quite some while.
IMHO "for t
On Tuesday, August 7 2001 00:19:50, Sean Rima wrote:
[...]
> Symbol's function definition is void: bbdb-add-hook
Use `add-hook' instead.
Robert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.so
On Tuesday, August 7 2001 12:01:03, Ronan Waide wrote:
> If I (accidentally) modify .bbdb externally to my main BBDB process,
> and then do M-x bbdb, BBDB asks me four times if I wish to revert. It
> should only ask once, and then proceed with that answer.
Happens only once for me.
I started Xema
On Monday, August 6 2001 10:15:30, Colin Rafferty wrote:
[...]
> I hate changing names just for the sake of changing names.
Well me too, but they are not just changed for the sake of
changing names, but also for minor functionality changes and
better naming.
> > Your are right, bbdb-one-line-d
On Monday, August 6 2001 14:44:55, Alex Schroeder wrote:
> Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > bbdb-default-display-mode (bbdb-elided-display)
> > either one-line, multi-line or 'full
> > bbdb-pop-up-default-display-mode (bbdb-pop-up-elided-disp
On Sunday, August 5 2001 02:30:59, Ronan Waide wrote:
> I don't know how much duplication of effort - if any - is
> involved in having both systems present.
A few lines. Apparently my commit has broken the old
behavior :/ but I have a fix already handy.
> What I think needs to be done is for
On Friday, August 3 2001 21:41:12, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On August 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > >> How is this different from `bbdb-elided-display'?
> >
> > DG> I want a full listing, in multiple lines, minus a couple fields.
> > DG> Robert's patch does this. bbdb-elided-display does not.
> >
On Friday, August 3 2001 10:55:11, Thomas E Deweese wrote:
[...]
> Yes, it does...
But not as I thought it should be.
I want elided display by default and when I switch to full
display I do not want to see some fields.
Neither way of setting bbdb-elided-display provides this.
whne setting it
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
