Dear BBDBler,
there is also some code in CVS now honoring the create-p in
the case where you get an offer to create a new record when
an matching records was found but you didn't want to add the
new email-address to it.
There was some discussion on this a while ago ... here is a
commit. Beside
On 7 Apr 2001, Jack Twilley wrote:
> > "Andrew" == Andrew J Cosgriff writes:
>
> Jack> Now, I know there's a way to set bbdb such that I don't get
> Jack> asked any more about djb@*.scream.org if I set net to
> Jack> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I can't see how. That's not the bug,
> Jack> althou
Jack> Now, I know there's a way to set bbdb such that I don't get
Jack> asked any more about djb@*.scream.org if I set net to
Jack> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I can't see how. That's not the bug,
Jack> although if someone would like to mention how, I'd really
Jack> appreciate it.
Since you already ha
On 07 Apr 2001, Jack Twilley yowled:
> One of the posters to one of my favorite newsgroups has an annoying
> approach to antispam. Here's his bbdb record:
>
> Dan Birchall
> net: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL
On April 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Dan Birchall
> net: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> creation-date: 27 Mar 2001
> timestamp: 27 Mar 2001
> newsgroups: alt.sysadmi
> "Andrew" == Andrew J Cosgriff writes:
Jack> Now, I know there's a way to set bbdb such that I don't get
Jack> asked any more about djb@*.scream.org if I set net to
Jack> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I can't see how. That's not the bug,
Jack> although if someone would like to mention how, I'd rea
Jack Twilley wrote :
> Now, I know there's a way to set bbdb such that I don't get asked
> any more about djb@*.scream.org if I set net to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I
> can't see how. That's not the bug, although if someone would like
> to mention how, I'd really appreciate it.
I think you just nee
One of the posters to one of my favorite newsgroups has an annoying
approach to antispam. Here's his bbdb record:
Dan Birchall
net: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
creation-date: 2
On Thursday, February 8 2001 23:07:45, Ronan Waide wrote:
[...]
> Waider. Releasing code is a great way to find all the bugs, I guess.
Well that one was not part of the release code ;)
Bye Robert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/list
(y or n)
>
> When I answer `n' I get asked, wether I want to create a new record.
> When I answer `y', however, nothing happens. The address X is not
> added to the record Y. Any ideas? A quick look at
> bbdb-annotate-message-sender didn't help... :)
I just noticed th
eate a new record.
When I answer `y', however, nothing happens. The address X is not
added to the record Y. Any ideas? A quick look at
bbdb-annotate-message-sender didn't help... :)
Looking at the following code:
(when (and (not (bbdb-y-or-n-p (
11 matches
Mail list logo
