que nickname for a mail recipient, or a group name for
multiple mail recipients, or possibly both/either.
I've just checked, and as I thought, "mail-alias" is an unknown field
type which I am asked to define. Before I go ahead, what does "defining"
a field type invol
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 at 2:09:26 am BST, Eric Abrahamsen
wrote:
> Phil Hudson writes:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 at 5:59:07 pm BST, Glyn Millington
>> wrote:
>>
>>> (add-hook 'message-setup-hook 'bbdb-mail-aliases)
>>
>> This led me
mail-alias
systems, one involving .mailrc and the other involving BBDB fields? Or
only one? If both, are they somehow integrated/overlapping, or are they
independent?
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.ddns.net
@UWascalWabbit
update the doc strings. That
seems consistent with the way v3 has tried to rename lots of opaque and
unintuitive "legacy" symbol names thus far. Maintainers can then
gradually eliminate the "obsolete symbol" compiler warnings over time.
Before I (attempt to) code this and
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 at 9:48:56 am BST, Glyn Millington
wrote:
> Yes. There are two. They are independent.
>
> But message.el can use either.
Got it. Thanks.
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.ddns.net
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 at 2:35:06 pm BST, Piet van Oostrum
wrote:
> In BBDB 3.1.2 there is no bbdb-define-all-aliases. It should be
> bbdb-mail-aliases, as mentioned in some earlier messages on this list. So the
> wiki should be updated.
Done.
--
Phil Hudson http
imap:INBOX" gnus-newsgroup-name)
>> (bbdb-select-message))
>> ((eq major-mode 'message-mode)
>> (bbdb-select-message))
>> (t
>> 'update)))
>>
>> ...and it actually takes effect.
>>
>>
"Principle of Least
Astonishment".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.ddns.net
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 at 10:34:32 am BST, Phil Hudson
wrote:
> The term "mail alias" itself seems to me to be poorly chosen, bespeaking
> an inward-looking, comp-sci-technical, "historical reasons" (IOW no
> reason) viewpoint rather than an outward-looking, user- and
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 at 5:43:16 am BST, Michael wrote:
> I haven't seen any mail on this list for about 2 months.
Guess not. I think that's probably a good sign. Could be v3 is now
"mature".
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.ddns.net
@UWascalWabbit
Can't see a way to use bbdb-dial* though. That's more like the do-it-now
alternative to this, which is more plan-it-now.
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.ddns.net
@UWascalWabbit PGP
11 matches
Mail list logo
