Because of the way computers are set up in our studio, a number of people
have access to the same machine using the same base user account. But, for
projects, things like server access, etc. all require unique login
information. So, for a project I'm working on right now, I'm using BBEdit to
The one thing I miss from Textmate (ok the color themes I miss too) is
syntax checking. Nothing fancy, just something that runs through the
script and stops at any syntax error.
I know I can do this from the command line.. but am I missing a
feature in bbedit? is there a way to do this within the
On May 5, 3:23 pm, Gabriel Roth gabe.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd love to see more organized sharing of BBEdit scripts etc.
(I tried to send this message earlier, but I guess it didn't get
through. Sorry if it's a repeat)
I started a Git repository for my Rails related BBEdit filters:
On 10-May-2011, at 07:19, Kristin Maling wrote:
Because of the way computers are set up in our studio, a number of people
have access to the same machine using the same base user account. But, for
projects, things like server access, etc. all require unique login
information. So, for a
Am 09.05.2011 um 07:27 schrieb crag:
The one thing I miss from Textmate (ok the color themes I miss too) is
syntax checking. Nothing fancy, just something that runs through the
script and stops at any syntax error.
make sure to check out this post by John Gruber. Not an in-BBEdit solution but
On May 09, 2011 at 05:55 AM -0700, Ryan Wilcox wrote:
The nice thing about TextMate is that the clippings/filters/etc etc
for a technology are grouped into a bundle. Download the Ruby on Rails
bundle and you get everything you might want.
Maybe we could put in a request to BareBones to think
Also, and speaking of Gruber, you can use color themes in BBEdit using
BBColors:
http://daringfireball.net/projects/bbcolors/
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Roland Küffner
medienmeis...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 09.05.2011 um 07:27 schrieb crag:
The one thing I miss from Textmate (ok the
On May 9, 7:29 am, Robert Huttinger roberthuttin...@gmail.com wrote:
ok after playing around I got the solution!!
#! /usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
while (){
s/([-a-z
]+:([^link|visited|hover|active]))\s*(.*)/sprintf(%-32s,$1) . $3/ie;
print;
}
Those are the
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:29:55AM -0400, Robert Huttinger wrote:
s/([-a-z ]+:([^link|visited|hover|active]))\s*(.*)/sprintf(%-32s,$1) .
$3/ie;
FYI, [^link|visited|hover|active] does not do what I presume you think it
does. [] is a character class, which matches exactly one character.
oh!! do I need (link|visited|hover|active) ?
bo
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Ronald J Kimball r...@tamias.net wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:29:55AM -0400, Robert Huttinger wrote:
s/([-a-z ]+:([^link|visited|hover|active]))\s*(.*)/sprintf(%-32s,$1) .
$3/ie;
FYI,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:22:21PM -0400, Robert Huttinger wrote:
oh!! do I need (link|visited|hover|active) ?
I'm not actually sure what you want that part of the regex to do. :)
Ronald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google
I thought I had gotten it to ignore those words. so anything that looked
like
:link || :active etc ignore those lines.
thanks!
bo
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Ronald J Kimball r...@tamias.net wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:22:21PM -0400, Robert Huttinger wrote:
oh!! do I need
On 2011-05-10, Robert Huttinger wrote:
oh!! do I need (link|visited|hover|active) ?
That would work for those. But I suggest that you re-read my
previous post, in which I suggested that you change only one
character from the regular expression in your earlier try:
Change the script line
On 2011-05-10, Bruce Van Allen wrote:
On 2011-05-10, Robert Huttinger wrote:
oh!! do I need (link|visited|hover|active) ?
That would work for those. But I suggest that you re-read my previous post, in
which I suggested that you change
Oops I missed where you had that
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:55:25PM -0400, Robert Huttinger wrote:
I thought I had gotten it to ignore those words. so anything that looked
like
:link || :active etc ignore those lines.
Okay, you could do something like this:
#! /usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
while (){
s/^([-a-z
@bruce @ronald: Noted!
good points both and Ill have to start using the forward lookup.
Good stuff, and Ill give it a go!
cheers.bo
On May 10, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:55:25PM -0400, Robert Huttinger wrote:
I thought I had gotten it to ignore
16 matches
Mail list logo
