On Friday 27 June 2008 10:40:39 Dale Walsh wrote:
A 1db or 2db increase in input sensitivity is probably more than
enough to improve a cards performance if it lacks it and can
compensate for design changes in poorly designed cards, a 10db
increase is essentially an increase of 1000%
On Friday 27 June 2008, Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 05:57 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2008 10:40:39 Dale Walsh wrote:
[...]
You're making a fool out of yourself.
I am ???
Yes.
You have absolutely no clue about the meaning of the values in the
sprom.
You're
On Jun 27, 2008, at 08:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2008, Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 05:57 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 27 June 2008 10:40:39 Dale Walsh wrote:
[...]
You're making a fool out of yourself.
I am ???
Yes.
And in my opinion this comment
Dale Walsh wrote:
...
And in my opinion this comment makes you look like an idiot.
And now that you're resorting to calling list members idiots this is
your opportunity for a time-out. Go stand in the corner, post on this
list no more, and stop lowering the S/N ratio. The idiot is the one
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Ehud Gavron wrote:
Dale Walsh wrote:
...
And in my opinion this comment makes you look like an idiot.
And now that you're resorting to calling list members idiots this
is your opportunity for a time-out. Go stand in the corner, post
on this list no more, and
Dale this is not a flame-war list or a place to show your illiteracy.
Step off.
Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Ehud Gavron wrote:
...
What is your problem, maybe you should up your medication!!!
I can't find you listed as a licensed physician. Are you dispensing
medical
On Jun 27, 2008, at 13:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dale this is not a flame-war list or a place to show your
illiteracy. Step off.
Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Ehud Gavron wrote:
...
What is your problem, maybe you should up your medication!!!
I can't find you
Dale Walsh wrote:
Now it's an issue of literacy???
I don't know when you became illiterate. I only noticed it in the
previous posting.
What a putz you are, looking for something, anything to make you feel
better than everyone else by giving you something to complain about, I
could care
You should really take Ehuds advice, Dale. But I fear you can't because
you really must have the last word, don't you?
Since you pissed off everyone who could possibly help you out, you don't
have anything to gain from staying here.
I suggest you re-read this discussion and figure out why you
On Jun 27, 2008, at 14:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dale Walsh wrote:
Now it's an issue of literacy???
I don't know when you became illiterate. I only noticed it in the
previous posting.
What a putz you are, looking for something, anything to make you
feel better than everyone
On Jun 27, 2008, at 14:37 PM, Richard Jonsson wrote:
You should really take Ehuds advice, Dale. But I fear you can't
because you really must have the last word, don't you?
I'm sorry it's hard to take advice from a putz and so far that is the
opinion I've reached based on my interaction
On Thursday 26 June 2008 03:00:58 Dale Walsh wrote:
ssb-sprom -i minipci_sprom -o minipci_new_sprom --antgbg 0x88
So you seriously think that increasing the antenna gain value
in the sprom by about 34 dBi is doing any good?
Who in their right mind would attempt a 34dbi increase?
The
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 05:55:25 Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 22:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I agree that ssb-sprom should be rewritten; however, before that is
done, we need to think carefully as to what variables should be
exposed for a user. For instance, should
On Jun 25, 2008, at 05:31 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 05:55:25 Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 22:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I agree that ssb-sprom should be rewritten; however, before that is
done, we need to think carefully as to what variables should
On Jun 25, 2008, at 08:35 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 13:51:54 Dale Walsh wrote:
The problem with your statement is that as far as I could locate,
this is the only tool that allows you to modify the subsystem vend/
prod ID's and to tweak antenna gains to improve
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 15:07 -0400, Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 08:35 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 13:51:54 Dale Walsh wrote:
The problem with your statement is that as far as I could locate,
this is the only tool that allows you to modify the
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 21:07:33 Dale Walsh wrote:
If the receiver has the gain reduced then the S/N ratio and the
signal level decrease logarithmically so turning it up has merit
provided that the noise level does saturate the input signal because
in most front-ends is some kind of
On Jun 25, 2008, at 15:33 PM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 21:07:33 Dale Walsh wrote:
If the receiver has the gain reduced then the S/N ratio and the
signal level decrease logarithmically so turning it up has merit
provided that the noise level does saturate the input
On Jun 25, 2008, at 15:19 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 15:07 -0400, Dale Walsh wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 08:35 AM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 13:51:54 Dale Walsh wrote:
The problem with your statement is that as far as I could locate,
this is the
Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello!
VALUE_ANTA0, VALUE_ANTA1, VALUE_ANTBG0 and VALUE_ANTBG1 are all read at
SPROM_BOARDREV + 2 for non-rev4 SPROM. SPROM_BOARDREV + 2 is equal
SPROM_PA0B0, which means that the same data is displayed twice.
The same values are written to SPROM_BOARDREV + 1. For
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 22:07 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I agree that ssb-sprom should be rewritten; however, before that is
done, we need to think carefully as to what variables should be
exposed for a user. For instance, should antenna gains be brought
out?
What about antenna enable
21 matches
Mail list logo
