Daniel Kuehn wrote:
There is an option in gmail to tell it to send the mails as
plain-text too.
That is what I use,
Good point - important to post plain text.
I think another point which is also really important is to
EXTENSIVELY TRIM messages that you reply to.
It is quite common that Gmail
Larry Finger wrote:
There could be a bug in the software that processes whatever WMI
info that your system generates. WMI (Windows Management Interface)
code handles the functions of the top row of your keyboard that are
generated by a fn+FX key.
The BIOS is rarely if ever involved in any of
Miklos Vajna wrote:
reboot pending to try the latest wireless-testing,
Please let me know if that helped (which git repo, which branch?).
It did not help. I merged
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git
master
into my kernel, and have posted a message
Interesting!
Miklos Vajna wrote:
Hi,
I tried asking on #bcm-users, then found the wiki where it's suggested
to report to this list, so I'm doing so. Sorry for the noise on IRC.
A description of the problem at hand:
My card works fine when I use it with WPA, however when I try to use it
Miklos Vajna wrote:
I have made some noise on the ath9k list about it, and currently have
a reboot pending to try the latest wireless-testing, which has gotten
some more fixes.
Please let me know if that helped (which git repo, which branch?).
Will do.
Should I include a section for
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Kuehn wrote:
Just reply under (below) quoted text (as I did in this mail).
I see, I am used to the opposite way in a normal email conversation
on gmail :P Will have to re think when posting to MLs then ^^
Thanks for keeping a good attitude! :)
Although Gmail has a huge
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
I know there were some series of notebooks accepting only one kind of
wireless cards. Not sure what vendor was that... Dell or HP maybe?
HP and IBM/Lenovo both have BIOS checks for particular PCI IDs and
only allow cards with certain IDs to be plugged in.
Do you have any
Michael Buesch wrote:
Hmm, surprise surprise. The slot is empty. They seem to have moved
it onto the motherborad.
Whoa, sick man. :)
So I think there's a fair chance that there's no sprom at all, if
the device is on-board.
One idea is to look up the FCC ID of the laptop in the FCC
Larry Finger wrote:
merely triggered by some interaction with ACPI and/or the BIOS.
From what I found in looking back through the DMA error reports,
most (if not all) people with the problem have netbook computers
with Intel ATOM processors.
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
Linus has also reported this
Oncaphillis wrote:
I poked around in the sbb code and found that ssb_do_read never
returns:
snip
static int sprom_do_read(struct ssb_bus *bus, u16 *sprom)
You wrote ssb_do_read above, this is sprom_do_read. Maybe they call
each other?
So I guess the mmio address is wrong. It is set to
Chris Vine wrote:
The problem is not with b43, but with ACPI. The debugging will
need to be done by that set of devs.
OK. I may try blacklisting different ACPI modules and see if I can
identify which one is causing the problem.
I'd suggest to go directly to the ACPI mailing list, do not
Daniel Schmitt wrote:
Is it right, that the only way to get 4 minipci cards working is a
x86 PC with a big huge ATX power supply and a big case? I know of
ALIX but I want something small and cheap for driving bcm4306 cards
... :(
The ALIX is a pretty nice deal, some models run under 70 EUR.
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Stefanik is there change you find some time to finish calibration
part before .32 merge window? Don't want to rush you, you already
have done great work, just would like to know.
Developers can (and they should) react very badly to questions like
this. Many times I do, I
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
+ 0x0128,
+ 0x0128,
+ 0x0009,
+ 0x0009,
+ 0x0028,
+ 0x0028,
Is it possible to use more than one value per line for all these
tables?
if you know a good regex to convert the tables to use multiple
values on each line, please post
Hi,
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Problem is that 0x2A doesn't seem to be anything outside our pci
region.
No, but it has reserved bits.
I know it's not really your business,
Correct. This issue has nothing to do with b43, and everything to do
with PCIe in general in the chipset.
Classic mixup of
Fabio A. Correa wrote:
The bottom line is that a BIOS error is likely the problem with
BAR allocation on your machine. Have you checked to see if an
updated one is available?
Hey, I found an updated BIOS available in the HP site, obviously
requiring Windows. I had deleted those
Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
The card does not seems easily replaceable, since the BIOS actually
checks which WiFi card is installed during boot.
And it won't boot with a non HP branded Intel card.
I would try to patch the BIOS, but that's not a good solution for
everyone. :\
//Peter
Larry Finger wrote:
If your laptop does not have an RFKILL button, I have no idea where
the signal to kill the radio is coming from.
It can be connected to just about any GPIO pin on any chip in the
system. The super IO, embedded controller and chipset all have IOs to
spare, some chips have a
Yuval Hager wrote:
I played around with different video drivers and the results are:
* If using the 'via' driver, I lose the PCIe card immediately upon
initialization
* Using the 'openchrome' (trunk version), It works well in the
beginning.
After first blanking the register reads are
Michael Buesch wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2008 12:49:55 Yuval Hager wrote:
[ 182.891400] ** b43: B43_MMIO_MACCTL 0x840A0503
[ 182.891409] ** b43: SSB_TMSLOW 0x2015
[ 258.299027] irq 10: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
Does the kernel disable the PCI
Yuval Hager wrote:
When the wireless is working:
00: e4 14 12 43 06 01 10 00 02 00 80 02 08 00 00 00
10: 04 c0 ff fd 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 01 00 00
After it fails:
00: e4 14 12 43 00 00 10 00 02 00 80 02 00 00 00 00
10: 04 00 00 00
Michael Buesch wrote:
Are these all the read/write bits in the configuration area?
No, there are more of them. Most bytes in config space are rw, except
the first four.
Should I conclude that someone zeroed this area?
No, because there are still valid bytes. Especially the first byte in
Yuval Hager wrote:
HP Mini 2133
I posted about the wifi in this guy a while back. It has ABG b43
which isn't really properly supported, at least not the A part but
the reaction I got from mentioning the chipset made me not expect too
much. I don't know if the ABG can be expected to behave
Michael Buesch wrote:
Nice work, but as it's a spec of another driver implementation rather
than hardware (or even the firmware API) I don't think it should be
so authoritative. If other values are clearly better why not use
them?
What crap are you smoking?
Maybe we just
Michael Buesch wrote:
Actually, I do know since the very first days of bcm43xx that the
loop counts are not big enough in some of these loops.
Would it make sense to double check the conditions after the loop?
But I didn't change it, as it was said the current counts match the
specs.
Which
Celejar wrote:
simultaneously associate with two different APs
They would at least have to be on the same channel - or I think you
would need double radios and hardware tricks?
//Peter
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Larry Finger wrote:
Which specs?
The ones generated by the reverse engineers. See
http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/.
Nice work, but as it's a spec of another driver implementation rather
than hardware (or even the firmware API) I don't think it should be
so authoritative. If other values are
Johannes Berg wrote:
..
(b) take rfkill state and transform it into conf.radio_enabled along
with the internal conf.radio_enabled state that mac80211 may decide
on based on iwconfig txpower off. assume that users know what
they're doing if they iwconfig txpower off, I think it's
Hello list.
I'm looking at buying an HP laptop which HP claims has 4311AG wifi.
I like to use .11a whenever possible and was a little sad to see that
b43 doesn't support it.
I am curious about why. Just lack of resources, or something more
technical?
Maybe I'll be able to help, in any case.
29 matches
Mail list logo
