On Do, 2009-10-22 at 17:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> + static int count;
count is declared, and incremented, but never set to 0. I guess this
will work anyway, because it might be magically cleared to 0 by defining
it (it is static, and will probably be allocated to some place that is
zero
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
> to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
> just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make
> some te
>
> Put a printk here to see if this branch is getting hit.
>
> (BTW, are you loading b43 with the "hwpctl" modparam? That enables
> experimental HW TX power control support, which might explain what you
> were seeing.)
Hi Gabor,
I'm stupid.
I applied 3 Patches, the analog switch patch, and th
ty=70/70 Signal level=10 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher
> >
> > ---
> > diff -uNr a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
> > b/drive
This patch adds the lpphy_clear_tx_power_offsets to b43.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher
---
diff -uNr a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-16 20:52:17.501318374 +0200
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009
The lpphy_update_tx_power_npt routine is currently missing in the code.
I added the routine according to the specs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher
---
diff -uNr compat-wireless-2009-09-15/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
compat-wireless-2009-09-15.mod/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
--- compat
I implemented the functions:
"lpphy_update_tx_power_npt"
and
"lpphy_set_tx_power_control",
and together, both improve the bitrate of my device:
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"tommy"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: XXX
Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
Hello Michael, Gábor & Larry,
I tried to implement the lpphy_update_tx_power_npt function according to
the specs. Please review this patch (I don't want to annoy Linville with
100 different versions of this patch).
Please note: I can verify it compiles, but it is UNTESTED (right now,
lack of time
ash
on the BCM5354 SoC (MIPS 32 LE plattform).
This patch implements the analog switch for LP PHYs according to the
specs. It fixes the crash
signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher
---
diff -uNr b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 200
isc:0 Missed beacon:0
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:56 +0200, Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
> On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:43 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> > Always send patches to John Linville, and CC linux-wireless.
> Ok, the last try ...
>
> As I've seen Gàbor's patch, I notice
1/PHY/Anacore)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher
diff -uNr b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0
+0200
+++ a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-14 21:03:15.158507573
+0200
@@ -22
As I've seen Gàbor's patch, I noticed that my previous patch was
bullshit. This patch should work:
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ilnseher
diff -uNr b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
--- b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0 +
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 21:10 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> The generic analog switch routine is not correct for LP-PHY according
> to the latest specs. Implement the proper analog core switch routine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gábor Stefanik
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_lp.c
> b/dri
On Mo, 2009-09-14 at 20:51 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Monday 14 September 2009 20:44:54 Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
> >
> >
>
> *) Please inline the patch
> *) Why do you rename b43_phyop_switch_analog_generic? It's "generic", because
>it work
diff -uNr compat-wireless-2009-09-14/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c compat-wireless-2009-09-14.mod/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c
--- compat-wireless-2009-09-14/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_a.c 2009-09-14 06:14:18.0 +0200
+++ compat-wireless-2009-09-14.mod/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_
from 804a906e (capab=0x431 status=0 aid=1)
wlan0: associated
cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: DE
cfg80211: Current regulatory domain updated by AP to: DE
(start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
(2402000 KHz - 2483500 KHz @ 4 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm)
usb 1-1
On So, 2009-09-13 at 19:05 +0200, Daniel Schmitt wrote:
>
> Does anybody know what I can change in OpenWRT relating to PCI options for
> WP188?
That maybe totally off topic, but:
I fiddled a bit with getting wireless running on an ASUS WL-520GU
router. I noticed the following:
OpenWRT's mac8021
On Sa, 2009-09-12 at 00:56 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> 2009/9/12 Gábor Stefanik :
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Thomas Ilnseher wrote:
> >> Hi List,
> >>
> >> I installed the latest version of OpenWRT on a ASUS WL-520GU.
> >> I compiles a
Hi List,
I installed the latest version of OpenWRT on a ASUS WL-520GU.
I compiles a few kernel patches to make the OpenWRT kernel (2.6.28.10)
compatible with compat wireless.
Than I patched OpenWRT to build compat-wireless-09-02
As said, It yields an instant crash:
cfg80211: World regulatory do
On Mo, 2009-05-11 at 00:53 +0530, Harshil Doshi wrote:
> hi my name is harshil doshi
> i have a request as how am i supposed to un-subscribe...pls help
> ___
> Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
> Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Hi!
Click the link below:
> https://li
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 14:30 +0100 schrieb Henning Holtschneider:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm trying to use the b43 driver on a Broadcom 5354 SoC platform
> running OpenWRT SVN Trunk (Linux kernel 2.6.28.7). When loading the
> driver, I get:
>
> b43-phy0: Broadcom 5354 WLAN found (core r
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
> 2009/1/22 Otto Solares :
> > FYI:
> >
> > Just found this in the Android's repository and think maybe this info
> > can be useful for someone in this list:
> >
> > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/wlan/broadcom.git;
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 10:26 +0100 schrieb Holger Schurig:
> > Just found this in the Android's repository and think maybe
> > this info can be useful for someone in this list:
> >
> > http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/wlan/broadcom
> >.git;a=summary
>
> .. and it's even GPL
Happy new year to all of You!
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
for x86.
> so the
> latest firmware might be in it too.
These are two totally different wl.o files. it will not work with x86
proprietary wl.(k)o driver.
>
--
Thomas Ilnseher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
kb rom.
I'd say you need a quite different (and simple) driver for this chip,
which does _not_ need to fuck around with phys and such things. at least
that is what broadcom states in their product briefs.
>
--
Thomas Ilnseher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_
> > Hi! It's my first post to bcm-43xx list. I searching about bcm4328
> > device without ndiswrapper, but i didn't found anything. Can you
> > tell me about this? thanks
> >
> "No bcm4328 support so far, we are working on that. Don't ask. There
> is NO support!", I'm not a developer, but this is
le / thx to
unionfs / tmpfs or simmilar things.
>
--
Thomas Ilnseher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
at least)
> Thank you very much!!
>
> ___
> Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
> Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
--
Thomas Ilnseher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
Hi,
I got an asus WL520GU (with LP PHY).
Unfortunately, even the specs on bcm-v4 are quite incomplete yet.
Is there any ETA when specs are complete, when prelimanry support is added
(offset to previous date, of course) ?
I'm trying to read the code of phy.c, but there are still some things that
30 matches
Mail list logo
