Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-02-02 Thread Wally Bkg
On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 3:26:37 PM UTC-6, RobertCNelson wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Wally Bkg > wrote: > > So you are saying I will still need to stay with the 7.9 image series > for > > BoneScript for the foreseeable future? > > or install the

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-02-02 Thread Robert Nelson
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Wally Bkg wrote: > > On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 3:26:37 PM UTC-6, RobertCNelson wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Wally Bkg wrote: >> > So you are saying I will still need to stay with the 7.9 image

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-31 Thread Robert Nelson
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Wally Bkg wrote: > So you are saying I will still need to stay with the 7.9 image series for > BoneScript for the foreseeable future? or install the 3.8.x based kernel on jessie. > Will the image be 2016-01-31 or something else? I

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-31 Thread Wally Bkg
So you are saying I will still need to stay with the 7.9 image series for BoneScript for the foreseeable future? Will the image be 2016-01-31 or something else? I notice the beagleboard.org/latest-images page was last edited Jan 31, 2016 but the latest 8.3 image is 2016-01-24 and the

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-30 Thread Robert Nelson
On Jan 30, 2016 1:36 PM, "Wally Bkg" wrote: > > Great! I'll be among the first to download Sunday's new Jessie image! Do you know if the BoneScript PWM is now working? Bonescript is still only written for 3.8, it needs to be ported to the 4.1 config-pin interface. > Most

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-30 Thread Wally Bkg
Great! I'll be among the first to download Sunday's new Jessie image! Do you know if the BoneScript PWM is now working? Most of my hours wasted is re-installing and re-configuring the non-standard stuff I use, so I'm not sure how bmaptool (which I assume is a "better" SD card burner)

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-29 Thread Robert Nelson
On Jan 29, 2016 5:28 PM, "Wally Bkg" wrote: > > I've been using the Jessie testing images, but they've all been broken for BoneScript. > > I'm helping a non-programmer friend get started with a project idea and I'm 99.9% sure that BoneScript and Node-Red is about the best

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-29 Thread Soapy Smith
Hi Wally- I've run into a similar problem whereby I downloaded the "Recommended" image from the beagleboard.org webpage, only to find that "Recommended" is not necessarily the same as "good" or "working". Linux seems to change and move quickly. For the cost of a microSD card and a few minutes

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-29 Thread Wally Bkg
I've been using the Jessie testing images, but they've all been broken for BoneScript. I'm helping a non-programmer friend get started with a project idea and I'm 99.9% sure that BoneScript and Node-Red is about the best starting point for what he wants to accomplish. Having a reliable USB

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-29 Thread Robert Nelson
On Jan 29, 2016 5:28 PM, "Wally Bkg" wrote: > > I've been using the Jessie testing images, but they've all been broken for BoneScript. > > I'm helping a non-programmer friend get started with a project idea and I'm 99.9% sure that BoneScript and Node-Red is about the best

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-29 Thread Wally Bkg
It seems the problem is that something in 2015-11-12 "latest" image has broken b.analogWrite() function compared to 2015-03-01 which seems to be the last version the BoneScript examples have been tested on, but the 2015-03-01 image shipped in the eMMC of my BBG is broken, and comes with

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-22 Thread Jason Kridner
Jessie wouldn't make much difference. The kernel version has a bit impact. The location of cape manager and indexes of the device tree entries have hard dependencies. On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:58 AM Wally Bkg wrote: > That would be nice. > > I'm not familar with npm

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-10 Thread Wally Bkg
That would be nice. I'm not familar with npm beyond the cut and paste commands I used following the node-red installation instructions. So how do I use npm to update BoneScript? The 0.2.5 system seems to mostly work although the fade.js example totally fails throwing undefined errors

[beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-09 Thread Wally Bkg
I've a pair of Beaglebone Greens, one running "latest" from beagleboard.org image 2015-11-12 kernel 3.8.13-bone79, the other running what came loaded in the eMMC: 2015-03-01 kernel 3.8.13-bone71.1 Both are "current" with apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade as of a day or two ago. I'm having some

Re: [beagleboard] Does apt-get upgrade not update BoneScript?

2016-01-09 Thread Jason Kridner
Seems we could switch it over to the native Debian package system rather than npm. On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:28 PM Wally Bkg wrote: > I've a pair of Beaglebone Greens, one running "latest" from > beagleboard.org image 2015-11-12 kernel 3.8.13-bone79, the other running >