[beagleboard] Re: USB 3.0 Support

One clarification We currently just need to access the USB3.0 device when the kernel's up and running. We don't need to boot from USB3.0. On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 9:35:10 AM UTC-5, Jeff Andich wrote: > > Hi, > > We will need to test out "USB3.0 functionality" when our custom board

[beagleboard] USB 3.0 Support

Hi, We will need to test out "USB3.0 functionality" when our custom board with the TI AM57xx (specifically, the am5718) arrives. I recall from a discussion at the ELC that the current TI SDK release (and possibly the BeagleBoard-X15 image) doesn't currently support USB3.0 in that the U-Boot

[beagleboard] LVDS display issue

Hello, So I am using the Beaglebone Black to run a LVDS display. Specs are: Model- G104XL-L03 Pixel Number (Resolution)- 1024x768 Size- 10.4' Interface- LVDS 18 or 24 Bit I am using a SN75LVDS83B to convert the parallel data (if that is relevant). At first I could not get the display to

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Difference between the console image and the IoT image

Thanks for the clarification Robert. Definitely want to give the snapshot for 2017-03-133 a spin and see if my customisation still works. Was baffled that the bone console image isnt listed on the main site[1]. Is there a reason for that? Am happy to help send a pull request if the site is on

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Difference between the console image and the IoT image

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:21 AM, 'Luther Goh Lu Feng' via BeagleBoard wrote: > The precise reason why I wish to use the console image is because I needed > the small footprint to minimise the attack interface. I have built up my own > BBB image on top of the

[beagleboard] Re: Difference between the console image and the IoT image

The precise reason why I wish to use the console image is because I needed the small footprint to minimise the attack interface. I have built up my own BBB image on top of the console image. The IoT image does not meet my requirements as it requires substantial effort to strip down. Does

[beagleboard] Re: Difference between the console image and the IoT image

The console image is minimalist. It doesn't have application software like servers already installed. This is good if you are developing a board for some security application where the "attack surface" should be minimalized. You will find that you need to install basic stuff like git.

[beagleboard] Re: Difference between the console image and the IoT image

A few weeks ago, I was using the image I found at https://rcn-ee.com/rootfs/bb.org/testing/2017-02-12/ Today, I found that the image has disappeared, which was not totally unexpected. Since it is supposed to be a snapshot. My question: is there a stable console image that we can refer to that