Can someone please point me to the history of connmanctl and when it was
introduced for Debian on BBB? All of the legacy documentation circa 2015
shows a simple entry in /etc/network/interfaces but clearly connmanctl is
the way to go now.
Thanks!
--
For more options, visit
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:21 PM wrote:
>
> Can someone please point me to the history of connmanctl and when it was
> introduced for Debian on BBB? All of the legacy documentation circa 2015
> shows a simple entry in /etc/network/interfaces but clearly connmanctl is the
> way to go now.
>
>
Using BeagleBoard.org Debian Buster IoT Image 2020-04-06
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 4:26:03 PM UTC-7, maxmike wrote:
>
> Wow - it looks like the entire cape-universal software is now broken:
>
>
> One used to be able to do : config-pin p8.12 out
> and then test it by issuing config-pin p8.12
I'm using a BeagleBone Black (kernel 4.14.108-ti-r131), and I was able to
successfully configure the MMC0 Dat0 and Dat1 pins to GPIO mode.
In am335x-bone-common.dtsi, I just modified the 2 entries related
to pinmux_mmc1_pins and changed them to MUX_MODE_7:
AM33XX_PADCONF(AM335X_PIN_MMC0_DAT0,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:26 PM maxmike wrote:
>>
>> Wow - it looks like the entire cape-universal software is now broken:
>
>
> One used to be able to do : config-pin p8.12 out
> and then test it by issuing config-pin p8.12 hi or lo
>
> This is no longer possible, now the pin can only be set as
>
> Wow - it looks like the entire cape-universal software is now broken:
One used to be able to do : config-pin p8.12 out
and then test it by issuing config-pin p8.12 hi or lo
This is no longer possible, now the pin can only be set as pruout and hi/lo
don't work anymore.
--
For more
> Thank you Robert! That is very helpful. For my wired NIC connections
> interfaces is dead simple. I can see the advantage of connman for wifi.
Yeah, today for a wired connection, not using "connman" works fine.
But there was a time about 2-3 years ago.. That Debian/Ubuntu had a
really
-Original Message-
From: beagleboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:beagleboard@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Robert Nelson
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 9:31 PM
To: Beagle Board
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] When was connmanctl introduced?
>On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:21 PM wrote:
>>
>> Can
Robert,
I have been working with the LTS 4.14 ti branch. Is 4.19 better? To be
honest, I don't remember the image I started with, but I started 6+ months
ago. I'm in a position where I can basically start fresh if there are
advantages.
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 11:37:10 AM UTC-4,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:35 AM Ramakrishna Bachimanchi
wrote:
> Hello,
> my name is Rama Bachimanchi and I am an electrical engineer working at
> Jefferson Lab (non-profit research organization). I have come across the
> amazing work you guys are doing and was looking into possibly modifying
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:32 AM Paul Beam wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> I have been working with the LTS 4.14 ti branch. Is 4.19 better? To be
> honest, I don't remember the image I started with, but I started 6+ months
> ago. I'm in a position where I can basically start fresh if there are
>
Thanks for all your shared work.
The plan for the Fall release (based on GSoC work on-going this summer, if
approved, or this might be delayed) is to modify the base device trees and
set of overlays to provide at common set of overlays to load for Black/AI.
Then, symlinks would be provided that
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:50 AM biggi_ wrote:
>
> Sorry for the book in advance, just want to make sure I outline all the steps
> I did to try to get to the bottom of this. I picked up an Element14
> Industrial Version of the BBB. Trying to get Python 3.6 installed to find
> out that it's
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:29 AM Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:42 AM wrote:
> >
> > I have done that, but I am perplexed with the results I posted – I think
> > that was from a different unit as I have several in various states of
> > development. From what I have read,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:42 AM wrote:
>
> I have done that, but I am perplexed with the results I posted – I think that
> was from a different unit as I have several in various states of development.
> From what I have read, the usb gadget takes most of the userspace time. On
> the one
> 2.649s loadcpufreq.service
>707ms cpufrequtils.service
It's safe to disable cpufrequtils, by default it's already running at
1Ghz out of u-boot and with Performance enabled
with the default kernel..
It's more for legacy..
debian@beaglebone:~$ systemd-analyze
Startup
Sorry for the book in advance, just want to make sure I outline all the
steps I did to try to get to the bottom of this. I picked up an Element14
Industrial Version of the BBB. Trying to get Python 3.6 installed to find
out that it's not supported on the Debian 8.11 that was running. Went to
If I was making a new board using the BBAI as the starting point, would it
be easy to simply upgrade the existing RAM to allow for 4GB rather than the
current 1GB? Would there need to be any OS changes (maybe just a device
tree change?).
Or, assuming infinite skill with reworking BGA's, is it
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:07:33 -0700 (PDT), in
gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user biggi_
wrote:
>IoT Flasher" and used Win32DiskImager to flash it to a microSD card. I
>also uncommented the
>"#cmdline=init=/opt/scripts/tools/eMMC/init-eMMC-flasher-v3.sh" at the
Apologies that I
I have done that, but I am perplexed with the results I posted – I think that
was from a different unit as I have several in various states of development.
From what I have read, the usb gadget takes most of the userspace time. On the
one hand, I find it amazing that the startup scripts work
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:51 PM Robert Nelson
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:49 PM wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know if there is an image for the bealgebone ai that will
> flash to the eMMC and includes the graphical desktop?
> > None of the images at http://beagleboard.org/latest-images have
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:05 AM Robert Nelson
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:01 AM wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have a BBB, Rev C and I was just trying to follow the Start menu and
> update the software, now, after I have tried to set it up, when I 'connect'
> to it it goes
As a follow up to my last email, one of the components in the BeagleBone Black
Industrial Bill of Materials has a temperature range of -20C to 85C. -20C is a
higher temperature than what is specified for the BBBI-4G on element14's
website (-40C to 85C). The component in question is part
> OK - but here we go again with cape-universal:
root@beaglebone:~# config-pin -q p9.26
Current mode for P9_26 is: default
root@beaglebone:~# config-pin p9.26 in+
ERROR: write() to /sys/devices/platform/ocp/ocp:P9_26_pinmux/state failed,
No such device
--
For more options, visit
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:32 PM maxmike wrote:
>
>
>> OK - but here we go again with cape-universal:
>
>
> root@beaglebone:~# config-pin -q p9.26
>
> Current mode for P9_26 is: default
>
> root@beaglebone:~# config-pin p9.26 in+
> ERROR: write() to
25 matches
Mail list logo
