On 7/20/07, Mr. Shawn H. Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chas Owens wrote:
> *Lisp and Scheme people actually use them as editors.
OK, you just scare the Hel out of me. You're one of those people who
think everyone should write programs that write programs that do real work.
Do not want.
sni
Chas Owens wrote:
*Lisp and Scheme people actually use them as editors.
OK, you just scare the Hel out of me. You're one of those people who
think everyone should write programs that write programs that do real work.
Do not want.
--
Just my 0.0002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
"For
On 7/20/07, Mr. Shawn H. Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chas Owens wrote:
> Yes, but that is not what a good REPL should do with it. Take a look
> at the pugs example again. The problem is that you are executing my
> code in your context. My code should be evaluated in a separate
> context.
Chas Owens wrote:
Yes, but that is not what a good REPL should do with it. Take a look
at the pugs example again. The problem is that you are executing my
code in your context. My code should be evaluated in a separate
context. There should be no difference between
No, I am executing my cod
On 7/20/07, Mr. Shawn H. Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chas Owens wrote:
> The problem is that "my $c = 5" creates a lexical inside the while
> loop created by -p and it goes out of scope immediately.
Yes, that's what 'my' means. If you do it without the 'my', it works.
And it has a lot of s
Chas Owens wrote:
The problem is that "my $c = 5" creates a lexical inside the while
loop created by -p and it goes out of scope immediately.
Yes, that's what 'my' means. If you do it without the 'my', it works.
And it has a lot of security problems. But it's also quick and easy to
remember
On 7/20/07, Chas Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/20/07, Adriano Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
> Just adding to what John already said, it hangs because, when used
> without arguments like script file names or " -e 'print qq{Hello,
> world\n}' ", it expects the script is co
On 7/20/07, Mr. Shawn H. Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chas Owens wrote:
> There are also some Perl REPLs* out there that allow you to use a Perl
> interpreter interactively.
>
> zoidberg, a Perl shell:
> http://search.cpan.org/~pardus/Zoidberg-0.95/lib/Zoidberg.pm
> psh, another Perl shell: h
Chas Owens wrote:
There are also some Perl REPLs* out there that allow you to use a Perl
interpreter interactively.
zoidberg, a Perl shell:
http://search.cpan.org/~pardus/Zoidberg-0.95/lib/Zoidberg.pm
psh, another Perl shell: http://sourceforge.net/projects/psh/
Devel::REPL, a modern Perl REPL:
Adriano Ferreira wrote:
Just adding to what John already said, it hangs because, when used
without arguments like script file names or " -e 'print qq{Hello,
world\n}' ", it expects the script is coming from the standard
input.
Well, actually the OP said he was using '#!/usr/bin/perl -wT'
On 7/20/07, Adriano Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
Just adding to what John already said, it hangs because, when used
without arguments like script file names or " -e 'print qq{Hello,
world\n}' ", it expects the script is coming from the standard
input.
So you can do
$ perl -wT
On 7/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Guys,
I am working on linux (redhat) 1999 version without the xwindows.
I have configured my dns server on this linux box and it works fine for my test
lab network at home. Apache and sendmail are also working fine without any
problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys,
Hello,
I am working on linux (redhat) 1999 version without the xwindows.
It's either X or the X Window System.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System
I have configured my dns server on this linux box and it works fine
for my test lab network at h
13 matches
Mail list logo
