Hi John,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:02 PM John Scudder wrote:
> Hi Donald,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On Apr 7, 2021, at 9:22 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
> ...
>
> 2. Section 2.3:
>
>EVPN Network OAM mechanisms MUST provide in-band monitoring
>capabilities. As such, OAM messages
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Hi Donald,
Thanks for your reply.
On Apr 7, 2021, at 9:22 PM, Donald Eastlake
mailto:d3e...@gmail.com>> wrote:
...
2. Section 2.3:
EVPN Network OAM mechanisms MUST provide in-band monitoring
capabilities. As such, OAM messages MUST be encoded so that they
exhibit identical entropy
Hi John,
Thanks for the comments, see below.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:53 PM John Scudder via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
>
> ...
>
>
Hi Éric,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:14 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
>
> ...
>
> --
> COMMENT:
>
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Thanks for your comments. See below.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:02 PM Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
>
> ...
>
>
Support the adoption.
Thanks
Parag
From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
Date: Monday, March 29, 2021 at 3:13 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-brissette-bess-evpn-l2gw-proto
Hello,
This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
As co-author I support adoption.
I am aware of an IPR which is in process of being disclosed.
Regards,
Luc André Burdet | Cisco | laburdet.i...@gmail.com | Tel: +1 613 254 4814
From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
Date: Monday, March 29, 2021 at 03:13
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Hi Donald,
Thanks.
Looking forward to reading the updated draft.
Jorge
From: Donald Eastlake
Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 10:17 PM
To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-...@ietf.org ,
bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments about draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-03
Hi Dhananjaya,
The limitations you mention below does not exist when using RD. Let me explain:
RD is an ‘identifier of convenience’. Which means:
* We use it to avoid path-hiding during BGP route propagation, and to
identify the originator uniquely across the domain.
* And we can strip
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Hi,
I have some comments on this draft.
1. There are 3 different encapsulations VXLAN/NVGRE/GENEVE defined in this
draft, but it is not clear if there is a mandatory one for interoperable
implementation, or all are mandatory ?
The effort to make BIER-EVPN "unified" with Unicast-EVPN (by
15 matches
Mail list logo
