Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-06.txt

s, >> Jeff >> >>> On May 27, 2023, at 1:48 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS >>> (B

Re: [bess] Please send slot request for BESS IETF 117

Hi Mankamana, Can I get 5 to 10 mins to present an update on draft-boutros-bess-elan-services-over-sr-04 Thanks, Sami > On Jun 30, 2023, at 7:32 AM, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) > wrote: > > All, > Primary

Re: [bess] Issues w/ draft-boutros-bess-elan-services-over-sr

Hi Ali, The draft doesn’t state neither 1 or 2 below. I’m not sure if we are looking at the same draft. Here is the text in the draft introduction The goal of the proposed approach is to greatly simplify control plane functions and minimize the amount of control plane messages PE

Re: [bess] comments on draft-boutros-bess-elan-services-over-sr

Hi Jorge, > On Nov 19, 2020, at 5:09 AM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Jeffrey, not sure how much of EVPN this solution is, since there are no > ‘overlay’ routes advertised. In fact the draft says that no routes type 1..4 > are needed at all. >

Re: [bess] comments on draft-boutros-bess-elan-services-over-sr

Hi Jeff, > On Nov 19, 2020, at 3:46 AM, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang > wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems that the draft is about using data-plane mac learning in an > EVPN-like solution. Actually the draft explicitly mention that we don’t need any EVPN routes, and not sure what EVPN-like solution

Re: [bess] IETF 109, call for slots

Hi Mankamana, We need 15 mins slot to present https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boutros-bess-elan-services-over-sr-00 Thanks, Sami > On Oct 23, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) > wrote: > > All, > Final agenda for IETF 109 is sent, please send me slot request if you want >

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04

Support, Sami Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 21, 2020, at 6:48 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) > wrote: > >  > Hello, > > This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for > draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04 [1] . > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working

Re: [bess] WG adoption call & IPR poll for draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping

Support as a co-author, not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Sami > On May 7, 2019, at 12:36 AM, > wrote: > > Hi, > > This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of > draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08[1] > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. > >

Re: [bess] Poll to progress draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane without implementation

Support, Please progress the document. Thanks, Sami Hi WG, draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-controlplane has passed WGLC and its finishing the shepherd's review phasis (I-D update required). It is in a good shape to progress further. However we are not aware of any implementation. As per our

Re: [bess] Slot requests for BESS WG session - IETF 103 - Bangkok

Hi, I would like to get a 5 min slot for Draft-Boutros-geneve-evpn-03 Thanks, Sami > On Oct 6, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) > wrote: > > All, > > It is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for IETF 103 Bangkok. > > Please send us your request for a presentation

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-03

-pw-bgp-03 Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:alias-boun...@ietf.org>> Resent-To: <ke...@arrcus.com<mailto:ke...@arrcus.com>>, Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>>, <jli...@cisco.com<mailto:jli...@cisco.com>>, <bin_

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway

Support for adoption Sami > On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:42 AM, Martin Vigoureux > wrote: > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week call for adoption on > draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway-05 [1] as a BESS Working Group Document. > > Please state on

Re: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp

Hi Martin, I'm not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Sami > On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:27 AM, Martin Vigoureux > wrote: > > Hello Working Group, > > This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-02 > [1] which is considered mature and ready for a

[bess] WG adoption for draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-03

Hi Martin and Thomas, We would like to ask for WG adoption for this draft, as there are vendor planned implementations for it. Thanks, Sami ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] [sfc] Extra time to reflect on draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane adoption following the IPR disclosure

Support . Thanks, Sami > On Apr 17, 2017, at 5:31 AM, UTTARO, JAMES wrote: > > Support > > Jim Uttaro > > From: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of luay.ja...@verizon.com > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 3:49 AM > To: BESS > Cc: s...@ietf.org >

Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-02.txt

Hi Thomas, Can we please ask for a WG adoption for the above draft? Thanks, Sami ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Alia Atlas' Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

cuit per global VNI due to the fact that we demux traffic strictly >using the label value and not the MAC address. > >Yours Irrespectively, > >John > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] >> Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [bess] Alia Atlas' Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Alia, Please see comments inline. On 4/11/17, 4:43 PM, "Alia Atlas" wrote: >Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for >draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-11: Discuss > >When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >email addresses included

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

vertising the P Flag set and the B Flag > clear, the Backup elected PE should advertise the P Flag clear and > the B Flag set, and the rest of the PEs in the same ES should signal > both P and B Flags clear.” > > >Let me know if I’m missing something please. Don’t want to

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

PE previously advertising a per-ES Ethernet A-D route, can >!withdraw this route signaling to the remote PEs to switch all the > VPWS service instances associated with this multi-homed ES to the >!backup PE > > 7 Acknowledgements > >-

Re: [bess] Routing Directorate Review for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-10

mplementation of > > VPWS both single-active and all-active redundancy modes can be > > supported. > > > >!In existing implementation with PWs, backup PWs are not used to carry > > traffic, while with EVPN, traffic can be load-balanced among > >

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Himanshu, Please see comments inline. Hi Sami – Some more comments for your consideration (based on -09- version) – Many of the followings are either clarifications related or editorial. 1- Overall comment : the draft uses long sentences, short sentences are more favored (at least that

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi John, I can add that the value is from 0 to 0x00ff, will that work? Thanks, Sami On 2/21/17, 10:56 AM, "John E Drake" wrote: >Sami, > >Snipped, comment inline > >Yours Irrespectively, > >John > >> > >> >> Ethernet Tag ID 32-bit field MUST be set to the 24-bit VPWS

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

anshu" <hs...@ciena.com<mailto:hs...@ciena.com>> Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 4:53 PM To: Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

anshu" <hs...@ciena.com<mailto:hs...@ciena.com>> Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM To: Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>>, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hs...@ciena.com<mailto:hs...@ciena.com>> Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mail

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Himanshu, From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hs...@ciena.com<mailto:hs...@ciena.com>> Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 3:04 PM To: Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>>, Sami Boutros <boutros.s...@gmail.com<mailto:boutros.s.

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Iftekhar, We can have a phone call to go over this, if you like, I will send you my availability in contact in a private e-mail. From: Iftekhar Hussain <ihuss...@infinera.com<mailto:ihuss...@infinera.com>> Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 10:45 AM To: Sami Boutros <sbou

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Himanshu, Please see comments inline. From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hs...@ciena.com<mailto:hs...@ciena.com>> Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:45 PM To: Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>>, Sami Boutros <boutros.s...@gm

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Iftekhar, Are you ok with what I added to the doc? For presenting the entity for Management. VPWS Service Instance: It is represented by a pair of EVPN service labels associated with a pair of endpoints. Each label is downstream assigned and advertised by the disposition PE through an

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Iftekhar, Please see inline > > > Hi Authors, > > I support this work. However, I do have few comments that I would like to add > to the list from the AD: > · Section 1: The terms ES and ACs are used interchangeably (e.g., > see “….Ethernet Virtual Private Line (EVPL) service

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

o:alias-boun...@ietf.org>> Resent-To: <saja...@cisco.com<mailto:saja...@cisco.com>>, <ssa...@cisco.com<mailto:ssa...@cisco.com>>, <jdr...@juniper.net<mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>>, <d...@steinbergnet.net<mailto:d...@steinbergnet.net>>, &l

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

...@ietf.org<mailto:alias-boun...@ietf.org>> Resent-To: <saja...@cisco.com<mailto:saja...@cisco.com>>, <ssa...@cisco.com<mailto:ssa...@cisco.com>>, <jdr...@juniper.net<mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>>, <d...@steinbergnet.net<mailto:d...@steinbergnet

Re: [bess] Call for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-01

Support. Sami > On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:44 AM, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang > wrote: > > Support. > >> -Original Message- >> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin >> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:58 AM >> To: bess@ietf.org >> Cc:

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

t-To: <saja...@cisco.com<mailto:saja...@cisco.com>>, <ssa...@cisco.com<mailto:ssa...@cisco.com>>, <jdr...@juniper.net<mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>>, <d...@steinbergnet.net<mailto:d...@steinbergnet.net>>, <thomas.beckh...@telekom.de<mailto:thomas.beckh...@t

Re: [bess] EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway rev03

ailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>> Date: Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 3:44 AM To: Sami Boutros <boutros.s...@gmail.com<mailto:boutros.s...@gmail.com>> Cc: "EXT Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <saja...@cisco.com<mailto:saja...@cisco.com>>, "Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)&qu

Re: [bess] Questions & comments on draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02

ing a similar thing, in scenarios where access node will only be capable of supporting dynamic EVPN-VPWS or even static EVPN-VPWS with no signaling. Thanks, Sami > >Thanks. > >Jeffrey > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@ci

Re: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 97 - Seoul

Hi Martin, I would like to present 3 old drafts with 5 mins for each draft a total of 15 mins. draft-boutros-bess-evpn-auto-provisoning draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01

Support as a co-author and not aware of any ipr Thanks, Sami Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 20, 2016, at 6:22 AM, "thomas.mo...@orange.com" > wrote: > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-01 [1] as a

Re: [bess] WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

Sure Martin, Will do. Sami Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:26 AM, Martin Vigoureux > wrote: > > WG, > > we have now received an answer from all the authors and to their knowledge > there is no undisclosed IPR that relates to this draft. > > Sami,

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

.@att.com>> Date: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 at 7:17 AM To: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzh...@juniper.net<mailto:zzh...@juniper.net>>, Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>> Cc: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

Hi Jeff, I am ok to remove the BW section, adding other authors for their I/p. Thanks, Sami From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzh...@juniper.net<mailto:zzh...@juniper.net>> Date: Friday, May 27, 2016 at 2:41 PM To: Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmw

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

Hi Jeffrey, Please see responses inline in green. From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzh...@juniper.net<mailto:zzh...@juniper.net>> Date: Monday, May 16, 2016 at 2:18 PM To: Sami Boutros <sbout...@vmware.com<mailto:sbout...@vmware.com>> Cc: "bess@ietf.or

Re: [bess] FW: WG Last Call (including implem status & shepherd) for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03

Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for your comments, Please see responses inline. Hi, As the document shepherd, I have the following questions/comments. Some of which are just editorial nits. This document describes how EVPN can be used to support virtual private wire service (VPWS) in MPLS/IP

Re: [bess] Questions & comments on draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02

Hi Jeffrey, Thanks for your comments and Please see comments inline.. On 3/24/16, 6:20 PM, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" wrote: >Sami and co-authors, > >I have some comments & questions on this draft. > >I noticed that the following terms are used in a mixed way and that adds

Re: [bess] Slots requests for BESS WG session - IETF 95 - Buenos Aires

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Sami Boutros <boutros.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > We would like to request slots for > > 1- draft-boutros-bess-evpn-auto-provisoning-01 , Speaker : Rex or Sami, 10 > mins. > 2- draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02 Speaker: Sami

Re: [bess] WG adoption for draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-00.txt

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Sami Boutros <boutros.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Thomas and Martin, > > The draft has been around for 3 years, and the authors think it is ready > for adoption, can we please ask for a WG poll for it? &g

Re: [bess] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree

Same here and I am not aware of any ipr beyond what was already disclosed Sami Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 3, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Aldrin Isaac wrote: > > I support as co-author. Not aware of any related IPR. > Cheers, > Aldrin > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:51 AM

Re: [bess] Regd. DF Election Notes

Same here Thanks, Sami Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 24, 2016, at 6:47 AM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE) > wrote: > > Support, since this enhances the DF election for EVPN > > On 1/11/16, 1:07 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" >

Re: [bess] Seeking Comments for EVPN-VPWS Service Edge Gateway

for the CE. Regular EVPN-VPWS procedures > should apply. > > +-+ +-+ > ++ +-----+ | | +-+ | | > | CE +---+ AN1 +-+ +-+ SE2 +-+ | > +--+-+ +-+ | IP/MPLS | +-+ | IP/MPLS | >|

[bess] Feedback on draft-boutros-bess-vxlan-evpn-00.txt

Hi, The draft has been around for almost 3 years and it is about interconnecting VXLAN or NVGRE networks with data plane mac learning via EVPN, the draft is informational and describe as well some useful use cases. Thanks, Sami ___ BESS mailing list

[bess] Seeking Feedback on evpn-auto-provisoning

Hi, The draft propose an EVPN route based on the FSOL packets to be sent to a controller in a data center network, to trigger a push of the related L2/L3 service configuration to be provisioned on the PE/NVE and on the switch ports.

[bess] draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-02

Hi Jorge, In some of the use case sections in the draft, there is no mention of the label/VNI that will be associated with RT-5. As well if the router-mac will be associated with RT-5 and the GW-IP will be set, why do we need to advertise those again in RT-2? Thanks, Sami

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-etree

same here. Thanks, Sami On May 19, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) saja...@cisco.com wrote: Support as a co-author. Not aware of any IPR that hasn¹t already been disclosed. Regards, Ali On 5/19/15, 12:22 PM, Martin Vigoureux martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05

Support. Thanks, Sami Hello Working Group, This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 [1]. Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or not (in both cases please also state the reasons). This poll runs until November the 3rd.