Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Sami: The reference to RFC5226 should be Normative. Other than that, it looks good to me. Thanks! Alvaro. On 2/24/17, 2:54 PM, "Sami Boutros" wrote: > Attached is the -10 draft with all updates. If All good, I will submit it > Monday. ___ BESS

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

In red.. Thanks, Himanshu From: BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros Date: Friday, February 24, 2017 at 2:29 PM To: "Shah, Himanshu" , Alvaro Retana , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org" Cc: Jeffrey Zhang , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Sub

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Himanshu, Please see comments inline. Hi Sami – Some more comments for your consideration (based on -09- version) – Many of the followings are either clarifications related or editorial. 1- Overall comment : the draft uses long sentences, short sentences are more favored (at least that is

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Date: Friday, February 24, 2017 at 10:17 AM To: Sami Boutros , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org" Cc: Jeffrey Zhang , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 One more thing…you’re missing the

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

One more thing…you’re missing the reference to RFC5226. Thanks! Alvaro. ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

On 2/21/17, 12:39 PM, "Sami Boutros" wrote: Sami: Hi! > Please see comments inline. I have submitted 09. I just have a couple of small things below, the biggest being the 24-bit alignment – which seems to be resolved on the list. I’m going to start the IETF Last Call, but please update the d

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

PM To: Shah, Himanshu; Sami Boutros; John E Drake; Alvaro Retana (aretana); draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org Cc: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Himanshu, I don’t think we should make the Eth-tag a MUST

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Agree with Patrice. The initial value was coming from the RFC7432 spec: “An Ethernet Tag ID is a 32-bit field containing either a 12-bit or 24-bit identifier that identifies a particular broadcast domain (e.g., a VLAN) in an EVPN instance.” And now there are a few implementations out there

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Himanshu, I don’t think we should make the Eth-tag a MUST be 24 bit. It should be MAY but if you decide to use 24 bits, it MUST be right aligned. Regards, Patrice Brissette On 2017-02-21, 2:51 PM, "Shah, Himanshu" wrote: ‘MAY’ does not work. It has to be ‘MUST’, IMO. Thank

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

‘MAY’ does not work. It has to be ‘MUST’, IMO. Thanks, Himanshu On 2/21/17, 2:22 PM, "BESS on behalf of Patrice Brissette (pbrisset)" wrote: Folks, Why don’t we simply mention that the Eth–Tag is a 32 bit value and MAY be set to a 24 bits instance When 24 bits value is used

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Folks, Why don’t we simply mention that the Eth–Tag is a 32 bit value and MAY be set to a 24 bits instance When 24 bits value is used is MAY be right aligned. Regards, Patrice Brissette On 2017-02-21, 2:18 PM, "BESS on behalf of Sami Boutros" wrote: Hi John, I can add that the va

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi John, I can add that the value is from 0 to 0x00ff, will that work? Thanks, Sami On 2/21/17, 10:56 AM, "John E Drake" wrote: >Sami, > >Snipped, comment inline > >Yours Irrespectively, > >John > >> > >> >> Ethernet Tag ID 32-bit field MUST be set to the 24-bit VPWS service >> >> instan

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Sami, Snipped, comment inline Yours Irrespectively, John > > > >> Ethernet Tag ID 32-bit field MUST be set to the 24-bit VPWS service > >> instance > identifier value." > > > > > > > >Ok, but you still didn’t mention how the 24-bit value is to be aligned in > >the 32- > bit field. I’m guessi

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Alvaro, Please see comments inline. I have submitted 09. Thanks, Sami > > >> > M4. Section 1.2 is titled Requirements. However, the list seems to >> > include a combination of > >> > statements of fact (“EPL service access circuit maps to the whole Ethernet >> > port”: this is pretty

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

On 2/3/17, 4:41 PM, "Sami Boutros" wrote: [Oops…sent the last two too early… ☹ ]   Sami: Hi > Thanks for your review. Please have a look at attached draft w/ most of the > comments > addressed.   Looking at the published version -08.   I have some answers to your answers below.  I also see th

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

On 2/16/17, 3:57 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> wrote: On 2/3/17, 4:41 PM, "Sami Boutros" wrote: > Thanks for your review. Please have a look at attached draft w/ most of the > comments > addressed. Looking at the published version -08. I have some answers

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

On 2/3/17, 4:41 PM, "Sami Boutros" wrote: > Thanks for your review. Please have a look at attached draft w/ most of the > comments > addressed. Looking at the published version -08. I have some answers to your answers below. I also see that there may be other changes as a result of th

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 How about this? In multihoming single-active scenario, for a given VPWS service instance, in steady state, as result of DF election, the Primary elected PE for the VPWS

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

@ietf.org>" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Sami – I recommend using Jorge’s text. Tha

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

7:46 PM To: Shah, Himanshu ; Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US) ; Sami Boutros ; Iftekhar Hussain Cc: Jeffrey Zhang ; Alvaro Retana (aretana) ; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Himanshu, Will

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

@ietf.org>" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Sami – I strongly suggest that more c

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

t;bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Ahh...This mak

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

mailto:aret...@cisco.com>>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>" mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v.

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

mailto:aret...@cisco.com>>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>" mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ie

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Sami – Thanks for clarifications. The rabadan-evpn-pref-df has the right idea (d

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 6:06 PM To: Shah, Himanshu ; Sami Boutros ; Iftekhar Hussain Cc: Jeffrey Zhang ; Alvaro Retana (aretana) ; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Himanshu, Please

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:25 AM To: Iftekhar Hussain Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana); Jeffrey Zhang; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Iftekhar, We can have a phone call to go

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

rg>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Sami, To make my comments clear (in case it didn’t come through earlie

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

11:55 AM To: Iftekhar Hussain Cc: Alvaro Retana (aretana); Jeffrey Zhang; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Iftekhar, The management entity you are looking for is the evpn VPWS service

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

ot; mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Sami – It seems to me that single-active multihoming c

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Iftekhar, Are you ok with what I added to the doc? For presenting the entity for Management. VPWS Service Instance: It is represented by a pair of EVPN service labels associated with a pair of endpoints. Each label is downstream assigned and

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Iftekhar, The management entity you are looking for is the evpn VPWS service instance, fxc can map more than one AC to this. I will add a definition in the doc to this evpn VPWS instance and mention that only one AC can be xconnected to it. Will that be ok? [Iftekhar2] An issue pointed ear

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org> Cc: Jeffrey Zhang; bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>; bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Dear authors: Hi! I just finished read

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Iftekhar, Are you ok with what I added to the doc? For presenting the entity for Management. VPWS Service Instance: It is represented by a pair of EVPN service labels associated with a pair of endpoints. Each label is downstream assigned and advertised by the disposition PE through an Ether

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

raft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org> Cc: Jeffrey Zhang; bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>; bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Dear authors: Hi! I just finished read

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

it is service tunnel, please indicate so. If this aspect is not addressed > properly, IMHO, this will cause lot of confusion. > > Thanks, > Iftekhar > From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 8:39 PM > To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Hi Iftekhar, Please see comments inline. From: Iftekhar Hussain mailto:ihuss...@infinera.com>> Date: Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 2:44 PM To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>>, "draft-ietf-bess-evpn

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org>> Cc: Jeffrey Zhang mailto:zzh...@juniper.net>>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>" mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" mailto:b

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Hi Alvaro, Thanks for your review. Please have a look at attached draft w/ most of the comments addressed. Please see comments inline Sami: Thanks, Sami From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:39 PM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 8:39 PM To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org Cc: Jeffrey Zhang; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07 Dear authors: Hi! I just finished reading this document. Please take a look at my comments below – I think

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Thanks Alvaro for your comments. Will address them and resubmit the draft. Thanks, Sami From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:39 PM To: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-v...@ietf.org" mailto:draft-ietf-

[bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-07

Dear authors: Hi! I just finished reading this document. Please take a look at my comments below – I think they should be easy to resolve. I will start the IETF Last Call when the comments have been addressed and a new revision has been published. Thanks! Alvaro. Major: M1. There are 8 a