Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-19 Thread Anoop Ghanwani
Message- > From: BESS on behalf of "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" > > Date: Friday, December 7, 2018 at 6:09 PM > To: Anoop Ghanwani , "bess@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [bess] Last Call: > (Framework for EVPN > Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility)

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-19 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
nature of Ethernet traffic and the lack of a TTL. Thank you. Jorge From: BESS on behalf of John E Drake Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 7:22 PM To: Neeraj Malhotra Cc: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensi

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-19 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
t;bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard Hi Anoop, Thank you very much for your editorial comments and review. We will take care of it. Best, --Satya On 12/

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-18 Thread John E Drake
Comment inline Sent from my iPhone On Dec 18, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Neeraj Malhotra mailto:neeraj.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, Very solid and understandable. Couple of minor comments [NM]: Section 2.1: Layer-2 devices are particularly susceptible to forwarding loops because of the broadcast nat

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-18 Thread Neeraj Malhotra
Hi, Very solid and understandable. Couple of minor comments [NM]: Section 2.1: Layer-2 devices are particularly susceptible to forwarding loops because of the broadcast nature of the Ethernet traffic. [NM]: better to refer to "Layer-2 services" instead of "Layer-2 devices" as the CE or PE device

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-17 Thread Neeraj Malhotra
Hi, Very solid and understandable. Couple of minor comments [NM]: Section 2.1: Layer-2 devices are particularly susceptible to forwarding loops because of the broadcast nature of the Ethernet traffic. [NM]: better to refer to "Layer-2 services" instead of "Layer-2 devices" as the CE or PE device

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-07 Thread Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
Hi Anoop, Thank you very much for your editorial comments and review. We will take care of it. Best, --Satya On 12/7/18, 1:01 AM, "BESS on behalf of Anoop Ghanwani" wrote: I have reviewed the doc and I have mostly editorial comments. Thanks, Anoop == Throug

Re: [bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-07 Thread Anoop Ghanwani
I have reviewed the doc and I have mostly editorial comments. Thanks, Anoop == Throughout VLAN Bundle, VLAN bundle, VLAN-Bundle, VLAN-bundle -- make consistent VLAN Aware Bundle, VLAN-aware bundle, VLAN-Aware Bundle -- make consistent bridge table, Bridge Table -- make consistent (also add defi

[bess] Last Call: (Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility) to Proposed Standard

2018-12-04 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG (bess) to consider the following document: - 'Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election Extensibility' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this acti