Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

In-line Good idea agreed that’s a good way to go using uSID along with SR-MPLS. I am going to set that up in my lab all 3 in parallel overlays SR-MPLS, uSID and SRv6. That may not be a bad idea having the architecture in parallel I wonder and using SRv6 when you don’t have MTU constraints

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

If you need uSIDs for MTU control or restrictions on the depth that you can parse in the packet, you should also consider regular MPLS-SR, or in an IP only network draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip (RFC editor's queue). - Stewart ___ BESS mailing list

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

In-line Thank you all for the response Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 6, 2019, at 11:54 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > > I just realized reading this note from Greg that he was arguing for something > different than I understood. To that degree, I apologize to Greg. My > comments do not

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

I just realized reading this note from Greg that he was arguing for something different than I understood. To that degree, I apologize to Greg. My comments do not reflect on Greg's Unified SID work. Yours, Joel PS: Greg, just so you know waht error I made, I connected U-SID with the uSID

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

Hi Joel, thank you for reviewing U-SID draft. I'm looking forward to reading a more detailed analysis. Regards, Greg On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 8:18 PM Joel M. Halpern wrote: > No Greg, uSID does not bring all the benefits of SRv6 while using > shorter SIDs. > It also violates the basic IP

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

+1 Hence, to avoid such violation, but still to use shorter SIDs, SRv6+ (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus-05 ) architecture has been proposed. Thanks, Krzysztof > On 2019-Oct-06, at 05:18, Joel M. Halpern

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

No Greg, uSID does not bring all the benefits of SRv6 while using shorter SIDs. It also violates the basic IP archtiecture really abdly. Yours, Joel On 10/5/2019 7:44 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote: Hi Gyan, you're asking very good questions and your arguments are all correct. But I think that now

Re: [bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

In line possible answers Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 4, 2019, at 8:22 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote: > > > Bess, > > What is the benefit of SRv6 over SR-MPLS for greenfield deployments or > existing mpls deployments. > I think I answered my own question but please chime in with your thoughts..

[bess] SRv6 versus SR-MPLS

Bess, What is the benefit of SRv6 over SR-MPLS for greenfield deployments or existing mpls deployments. Regards, Gyan Mishra IT Network Engineering & Technology Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) 13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor Silver Spring, MD 20904 United States Phone: 301 502-1347