Hi Martin,
We have just implemented RFC7814 a couple of months before in response to the
demands of some of our customers, and those customers have deployed this
L3-based overlay technology within their hyper-scale cloud data center network
environment recently. We are planning to implement
dr
I support the publication of this draft as an informational RFC, and as a
coauthor I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
-邮件原件-
发件人: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com]
发送时间: 2016年8月16日 20:48
收件人: BESS
抄送: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fi
Hi Stephen,
I wonder whether the following explanation is fine to you.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: Xuxiaohu
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 5:27 PM
> To: 'Stephen Farrell'; Alvaro Retana (aretana); The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 3:21 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; Alvaro Retana (aretana); The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org;
> martin.vigour...@alcate
about
this usage?
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 5:00 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; Alvaro Retana (aretana); The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-
[mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:47 PM
> To: Alvaro Retana (aretana); Xuxiaohu; The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org;
> martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell&
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 8:00 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org;
> martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com; b
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 7:40 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org;
> martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com; b
Hi Stephen,
Thank a lot for your DISCUSS. I fully agree with you that sensitive traffic
being handled by VMs should be encrypted when traversing across the Internet or
even SP networks. Similarly, I think you would also agree that sensitive
traffic of VPN clients should be encrypted as well in
Hi Alia,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alia Atlas [mailto:akat...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 11:07 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; aret...@cisco.com;
> bess-cha...@ietf.org; martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: Al
Hi Ben,
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ben Campbell
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:59 AM
> To: Xuxiaohu
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; The IESG; aret...@cisco.com;
> bess-cha...@ietf.org; martin
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your comments. Please see my response inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 6:29 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org; aret...@cisco.com;
> bess-cha...@ietf.org; martin.
I fully agree with Eric's points. In addition to the side-effects Eric had
raised, I think it may intensify the monopolization in specification due to the
implementation requirement before WG LC. For example, some giants could afford
the implementation of whatever specifications they had propose
Alvaro,
I will update it ASAP.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:27 AM
To: Xuxiaohu; draft-ietf-bess-virtual-sub...@ietf.org
Cc: VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN); bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD
lable at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-03
Best regards,
Xiaohu
From: Xuxiaohu
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 1:04 PM
To: Alvaro Retana (ar
Hi Alvaro,
Thanks for your detailed AD review. We will update the draft according to your
comments soon.
Best regards,
Xiaohu (on behalf of all co-authors)
发件人: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [aret...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2015年10月28日 5:38
收件人: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-
How to interconnect DC VPNs with WAN VPNs in a much scalable way is very
important in the hybrid cloud scenario, especially for those SPs who operate
both DC VPNs and WAN VPNs. Therefore, it support the WG adoption of this draft.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
发件人: B
Hi Eric,
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric C Rosen [mailto:ero...@juniper.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 12:35 AM
> To: Xuxiaohu; thomas.mo...@orange.com; i...@ietf.org; BESS
> Cc: ero...@juniper.net; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-over...@tools.ietf.org;
> draft-ro
Hi all,
The major rationale of the BGP Encap SAFI is as follows:
"Since the encapsulation information is coded as an attribute, one
could ask whether a new SAFI is really required. After all, a BGP
speaker could simply attach the tunnel encapsulation attribute to
each prefix (like Q i
e the ranges reserved in [RFC1918] in
documentation as well, especially when demonstrating the VPN addresses?
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: Benson Schliesser [mailto:bens...@queuefull.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 6:00 AM
> To: Xuxiaohu
> Cc: Loa Ande
Hi Loa,
Thanks a lot for your review. Please see my response inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:52 PM
> To: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-sub...@tools.ietf.org;
> bess-cha...@tools.
I'm not aware of any relevant IPR.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:13 AM
> To: BESS
> Subject: [bess] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet
>
> Hello
>
> this
Hi all,
In the hybrid cloud scenario where the private cloud (i.e., the on-premises
data center) is connected to the public cloud via service providers' L3VPN, if
a subnet in the public cloud is extended across multiple DC locations (either
via L3VPN or L2VPN), the L3VPN PE on the private cloud
Hi Carlos,
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpign...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:58 AM
> To: Adrian Farrel
> Cc: Loa Andersson; RFC Errata System; Xuxiaohu; nsh...@juniper.net; Lucy
> yong; Ross Callon; Black, David; Al
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 9:04 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp//RE:
> Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-ud
Hi Adrian,
Thanks a lot for your quick response.
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:14 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp//RE:
age-
> From: Xuxiaohu
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 11:31 AM
> To: 'adr...@olddog.co.uk'; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [bess] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp//RE:
> Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp
>
> Hi Ad
> Thanks for making that suggestion. Although RFC5512 (i.e.,
> draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-safi) and RFC5566 (i.e.,
> draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-ipsec) have been originated from Softwire WG and
> the current Softwire WG charter (https://tools.ietf.org/wg/softwire/charters)
> still state that "BGP a
n MPLS-in-UDP. That's to say, what type of
payload will be carried over the UDP tunnel cloud be explicitly indicated by
the protocol type sub-TLV.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> Adrian
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf O
ormed from draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp?
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: Xuxiaohu
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:13 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org
> Cc: Softwires WG
> Subject: RE: [bess] Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to
> draft
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xuxiaohu
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:21 AM
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: Softwires WG
> Subject: [bess] Why transform draft-xu-softwire-encaps-udp to
> draft-xu-bess-encaps-udp
>
> Hi all,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Xuxiaohu
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:45 AM
> To: 'adr...@olddog.co.uk'; 'Black, David'; rcal...@juniper.net;
> draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-sys...@tools.ietf.org; bess-cha...@tools.ietf.org;
> softwire-cha...@tools.ietf.org
&g
regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:01 AM
> To: Nischal Sheth; Xuxiaohu; Rajiv Asati; Xuxiaohu; Nischal Sheth; Rajiv Asati
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-xu-
By the way, this draft is an update of the previous draft
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-l3vpn-prefix-orf-00).
> -Original Message-
> From: Xuxiaohu
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 10:00 AM
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Subject: FW: New Version Notification for
> d
Any comments and suggestions are welcome.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 3:48 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; Xuxiaohu
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-xu-be
Any comments and suggestions are welcome.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 5:29 PM
> To: Brendan Fee; Xuxiaohu; Brendan Fee; Susan Hares; Yongbing Fan; Xuxiaohu;
&g
Support as a co-author. I'm not aware of any IPR related to this doc.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 7:06 PM
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-fib-re
Yes, your observation is correct.
> -Original Message-
> From: S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram)
> [mailto:somasundara...@alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 11:32 AM
> To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-l3vpn-vir
Sound reasonable, Would you please offer some concrete text?
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram)
> [mailto:somasundara...@alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:56 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org
> Subje
> -Original Message-
> From: S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram)
> [mailto:somasundara...@alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:32 PM
> To: Xuxiaohu; bess@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-02.txt
>
> Hi Xu,
Hi Somasundaram,
Those locally connected /32 host routes are redistributed into BGP. It's an
implementation issue.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> -Original Message-
> From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of S, Somasundaram
> (Somasundaram)
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:08
41 matches
Mail list logo
