Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2019-02-06 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 12:41 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" Cc: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] About dr

Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2019-02-04 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Hi Jorge, i was thinking over your comment on fast leave. Do we really need text around that ? Here are my thoughts 1. In case of multihoming it would be expected that user does identical configuration on both bridge port. So immediate leave MUST be configured on bridge port on redundant

Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2018-03-22 Thread John E Drake
...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy Hi Ali, and Authors, Do you think it makes sense to change name of Route from "IGMP join sync route" to "Multicast join sync route" ? As these routes are to be used for IGMP and MLD both.

Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2018-03-22 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
;Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" Cc: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pr...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy Hi Ali, and Authors, Do you think it makes sense to ch

Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2018-03-22 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Hi Ali, and Authors, Do you think it makes sense to change name of Route from "IGMP join sync route" to "Multicast join sync route" ? As these routes are to be used for IGMP and MLD both. and there is already discussion in PIM proxy draft to modify same route to carry PIM state too. so woul

Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2018-03-21 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Hi Ali, Yes, the Fast Leave option is used pretty often, and the caveats are no different than what we are discussing here. Only directly connected receivers or directly connected proxy-CEs. I'm good with your replies. We are in synch now. Looking forward to seeing the next revision. Thank you

Re: [bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2018-03-21 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Jorge, Please refer to my comments inline marked w/ "Ali>" On 3/21/18, 1:59 AM, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" wrote: Ali and authors, As discussed during the BESS session, these are the points that I think should be addressed in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-pro

[bess] About draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

2018-03-21 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Ali and authors, As discussed during the BESS session, these are the points that I think should be addressed in draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy before WG LC: 1) Fast Leave text addition There are quite a few ig