...@juniper.net>, "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Hi,
We use the virtual ES concept to get additional gra
ntain View)
<jorge.raba...@nokia.com>; Eric Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>; Satya Mohanty
(satyamoh) <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Hi Sandy,
Yes, you can have all remote VTEPs share th
S/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>, Eric Rosen
<ero...@juniper.net>, "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
proble
adan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>, Eric
Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>, Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "Satya
Mohanty (satyamoh)" <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <saja...@cisco.com>, "be
John E Drake <jdr...@juniper.net>; Rabadan,
Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>; Eric Rosen
<ero...@juniper.net>; Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>; Satya Mohanty
(satyamoh) <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] dra
u.clara.net>; Satya Mohanty
(satyamoh) <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: bess@ietf.org; Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <saja...@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Hi Jim,
About your pointing of writing down requirement draft for multicas
okia.com>; Eric Rosen
<ero...@juniper.net>; Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>; Satya Mohanty
(satyamoh) <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Hi Jim,
draft-mohanty-bess-evp
et>>,
"bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Satya,
Comment inline.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
[John] Wouldn’t it be better to have thi
, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>, Eric
Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>, Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "Satya
Mohanty (satyamoh)" <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: RE
tya Mohanty
(satyamoh) <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Hi Jim,
draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt will focus on L2 only between EVPN overlay
(VxLAN) access domain and EVPN MPLS core. Connecti
lt;ero...@juniper.net>, Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "Satya
Mohanty (satyamoh)" <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Ali,
gt;>, Sandy Breeze
<sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net<mailto:sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>>, "Satya Mohanty
(satyamoh)" <satya...@cisco.com<mailto:satya...@cisco.com>>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org
Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>, Eric
Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>, Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "Satya
Mohanty (satyamoh)" <satya...@cisco.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
.@cisco.com>; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
I had some further discussions with the authors of the draft and we have
reached the following conclusions:
1) The solution that they will capture in th
Satya,
Comment inline.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
[John] Wouldn’t it be better to have this draft define a bit in the Multicast
Flags extended community
to:sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>>,
"bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Eric, as discussed and you point out, one can easily interpret
Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
<jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, Sandy Breeze
<sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net<mailto:sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>>,
"bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
...@nokia.com>
Date: Saturday, March 24, 2018 at 3:58 AM
To: Eric C Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>, Sandy Breeze
<sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Er
Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>,
"bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Hi,
Wouldn’t it be better to have this draft define a bit in the Multicast Flags
extended community
(https://to
te: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 7:58 AM
To: Eric C Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>, Sandy Breeze
<sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Eric,
The way the
/Mountain View)"
<jorge.raba...@nokia.com<mailto:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, Eric C Rosen
<ero...@juniper.net<mailto:ero...@juniper.net>>,
"bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [bess]
John, Eric, Jorge,
[Sandy] Comments inline
On 24/03/2018, 10:57, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
> wrote:
Eric, as discussed and you point out, one can easily interpret that IMET is not
mandatory in some cases where
cents.
Jorge
From: Eric C Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>
Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 5:00 PM
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>,
Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: R
[Jorge] my interpretation of RFC7432 is that IMET routes are mandatory
to enable the handling of multi-destination traffic in a BD. But in a
non-DF PE for a given ES and with no other ACs in the BD, assuming
Ingress Replication, there is no such multi-destination traffic (Tx or
Rx). So one
r.net>; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Hi John,
On 22/03/2018, 15:50, "John E Drake"
<jdr...@juniper.net<mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>> wrote:
Hi,
Wouldn’t it be better to have this draft define a
org> On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
US/Mountain View)
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 10:58 AM
To: Eric Rosen <ero...@juniper.net>; Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>;
bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem descriptio
n View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>,
Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
On 3/21/2018 12:36 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
8 at 1:57 PM
To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>,
Sandy Breeze <sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
On 3/21/2018 12:36 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) wrote:
This scenario definitively helps understand the use-case better. Still
a bit specific but I think you should add this scenario to the draft,
and again, make it Informational since there is no control plane
change for
@eu.clara.net<mailto:sandy.bre...@eu.clara.net>>,
"bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on
problem description
Satya,
If we do this, it requires that w
30 matches
Mail list logo