Dear authors,
I have some questions regarding draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05.
The last paragraph of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05#section-4.1.2
(Page 21) said:
If EVPN-IRB NVEs are configured not to advertise MAC-only routes,
It is good to make this explicit. This ambiguity has led to some unnecessary
interworking problems.
Should we also need to explicitly define the "bottom of stack" bit in the
low-order bit of the 3-octet label field?
Thanks,
Shunwan
-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@iet
It looks good to me. I have not found any specific purposes of these bits in
RFC7432. Maybe I missed something.
Thanks,
Shunwan
-Original Message-
From: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) [mailto:jhe...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:24 AM
To: Zhuangshunwan ; BESS
Subject: RE
Hi Jorge,
8.4. Aliasing and Backup Path of RFC7432 says:
. The backup path is a closely related function, but it is used in
. Single-Active redundancy mode. In this case, a PE also advertises
. that it has reachability to a given EVI/ES using the same combination
. of Ethernet A-D per
Yes/support
Regards,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
stephane.litkow...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:22 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for
draft-zzhang-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-01
Hi WG,
This email begins a two-week
I support adoption.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB)
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2018 10:53 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-liu-bess-mvpn-y...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] Wg Adoption and IPR poll for draft-liu-bess-mvpn-yang-07
This em
Support the adoption of this document.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB)
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 6:23 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-salam-bess-evpn-oam-req-fr...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
d
Dear authors and WGs,
RFC5549 Section 6.2 says:
.. 6.2. IPv4 VPN over IPv6 Core
..
..The extensions defined in this document may be used for support of
..IPV4 VPNs over an IPv6 backbone. In this application, PE routers
..would advertise VPN-IPv4 NLRI in the MP_REACH_NLRI along with
some of the current
implementations are also doing this way.
I hope that the WGs can give a consistent opinion on this issue and avoid
interoperability problem in the future.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: ianfar...@gmx.com [mailto:ianfar...@gmx.com]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 8:08 PM
To: Zhuangshunwan
Hi all,
Can the WG reach a conclusion on how to treat that erratum related to RFC5549:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5253
Thanks,
Shunwan
-Original Message-
From: Softwires [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vigoureux,
Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Sent: Thursda
Hi all,
For L3VPN features, there are some differences:
Per RFC4634, the IPv4-VPN routes shall carry the V4 Next-hop, beginning with an
8-octet RD and ending with a 4-octet IPv4 address.
Per RFC4659, the IPv6-VPN routes shall carry the V6 Next-hop, beginning with an
8-octet RD and ending with
Hello Matthew and Stephane,
I support the adoption of this draft as co-author.
And I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) [mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 7:00 PM
To: draft-dawra-bess-srv6-serv
Support adoption of this draft. This draft reflects current multiple existing
running implementations.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB)
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 8:37 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subj
Hi Robert,
Inline with [Shunwan]
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2019 7:37 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) ;
bess-cha...@ietf.org; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re
Support.
Huawei has an implementation that is consistent with this draft.
Kind regards
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB)
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 1:53 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and Implementation Poll for
dr
I support WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB)
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 10:42 PM
To: draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for
I support WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8:14 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07
Hello,
This email begins
I support this draft.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB)
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 6:56 PM
To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-fr...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-re
Matthew, Stephane and WG,
I'm not aware of any relevant IPR.
As a co-author, I support publishing this draft as a standards track RFC.
I know that there are many implementations and interoperability tests that have
already been listed in the document:
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-matsushima-
Hi,
I support publishing this draft as standards track RFC.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 11:53 PM
To: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-la...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Su
Support
Best Regards,
Shunwan
-邮件原件-
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Thomas Morin
发送时间: 2014年10月27日 16:46
收件人: bess
抄送: draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefi...@tools.ietf.org; bess ADs;
draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefi...@tools.ietf.org
主题: [bess] Extended to Nov 4th: New
Dear Authors,
I have a comment, see inline with [Shunwan].
5.2.1. Service startup procedures
As soon as the EVIs are created in PE1, PE2 and PE3, the following
control plane actions are carried out:
o Flooding tree setup per EVI (4k routes): Each PE will send one
Inclusive Multica
Support.
This draft provides a highly scalable inter-as option between NVO3 network and
MPLS/IP VPN network.
Shunwan
-邮件原件-
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Thomas Morin
发送时间: 2015年10月22日 23:31
收件人: bess@ietf.org
抄送: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-opti...@tools.ietf.org
主题: [be
Hi Diego,
Thanks for your comments. Pls see inline with [Vincent].
Vincent
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Diego Garcia del Rio
发送时间: 2015年11月18日 14:25
收件人: bess@ietf.org
主题: Re: [bess] draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc
Some comments from my side,
I think the draft makes qu
...@orange.com
>> >> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:02 AM
>> >> To: Henderickx, Wim (Wim); bess@ietf.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [bess] draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc
>> >>
>> >> 2015-11-19, Henderickx, Wim (Wim):
>> >&g
I have read this document, and I think that it is a useful solution to connect
the IPv4-only islands across the IPv6-only network running with MPLS.
Regards,
Shunwan
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
发送时间: 2016年3月10日 17:32
收件人: Eric C Rosen; bess
主题: Re: [bess]
Hi,
As a co-author, I support this draft.
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this document.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
-邮件原件-
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Thomas Morin
发送时间: 2016年5月4日 22:18
收件人: bess@ietf.org
抄送: draft-shah-bess-l2vpn-y...@tools.ietf.org
主题: [bess] Poll
Hi,
I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document.
I have read this draft and think that it's ready to move forward.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
-邮件原件-
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Thomas Morin
发送时间: 2016年5月4日 22:18
收件人: bess@ietf.org
抄送: draft-brissette-bess-evpn-y...@t
I have read this draft and I support its publication as an informational RFC.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
-邮件原件-
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Martin Vigoureux
发送时间: 2016年8月16日 20:48
收件人: BESS
抄送: draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduct...@ietf.org
主题: [bess] WG Last Call for dr
Support and I am not aware of any IPR on this draft.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
-邮件原件-
发件人: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com]
发送时间: 2016年8月16日 20:42
收件人: bess@ietf.org
抄送: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-y...@ietf.org
主题: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01
Hello w
Support and I am not aware of any IPR on this draft.
Best Regards,
-Shunwan
-邮件原件-
发件人: Thomas Morin [mailto:thomas.mo...@orange.com]
发送时间: 2016年8月16日 20:42
收件人: bess@ietf.org
抄送: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-y...@ietf.org
主题: Call for adoption: draft-dhjain-bess-bgp-l3vpn-yang-01
Hell
Support adoption.
Thanks
Shunwan
发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 stephane.litkow...@orange.com
发送时间: 2018年4月18日 21:28
收件人: bess@ietf.org
主题: Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll on draft-liu-bess-mvpn-yang-05
Hi WG,
This is a gentle reminder that this poll is currently running.
We h
Hi all,
I agree with Vasilenko and Ketan.
The meaning of the label is given by the encapsulation. According to
RFC8365[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8365], there are already a
precedent for using the label field to carry VNI and without the new AFI/SAFI,
and there are a large number
Hi all,
+1 for Robert.
Yes, especially when MPLS in GRE or MPLS in UDP is deployed, packets carrying
MPLS labels can traverse all IP-reachable networks and reach remote PEs.
BR,
Shunwan
From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 11:28 PM
To: Warren Kumari
Hi Everyone,
I support the publication of this draft.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB)
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 7:06 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage
Hi Matthew and Stephane,
I have read this draft, it provides the useful mechanism of distributing S-BFD
discriminators with VPN service routes, I support adoption of this draft.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday,
Dear Co-Authors,
Thank you for contributing this very useful document! I support the adoption of
this document.
One comment:
Regarding the "ID Length" and "Nonce Length" in the Base (Minimal Set) DIM
Sub-TLV, Figure 6 shows the following:
0 1 2
Dear authors,
Some of the text in the section 5.2 of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-15
describes the following:
"
5.2. BGP Walk Through for Homogeneous Encrypted SD-WAN
...
UPDATE U1:
- MP-NLRI Path Attribute:
192.0.2.4/30
192.0.2.8/30
- Nexthop: 192.0.2.2
Dear Co-Authors,
Regarding the "ID Length" in the Base (Minimal Set) DIM Sub-TLV, Figure 6 of
draft-ietf-bess-secure-evpn shows the following:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
+-+-+-+
I support WG adoption.
Best regards,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 6:45 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16
Hi Linda,
Thank you for your reply. I now understand the solution described in the draft
and I support its WG adoption.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dun...@futurewei.com]
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 4:42 AM
To: Zhuangshunwan ; bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Mail
41 matches
Mail list logo