I just looked at the NP interface of Squeezeplay beta (see pic). Maybe
the same or very similar layout for the SN Remote Control will work.
This way there is consistency across Squeezeplay, the Controller and
the SN Remote Control. No need to get used to the different players
layouts that
About the crayon stuff it's probably very chic and modern design ;)
Like the new nightclubs that looks like iPods these days, o well I'm
getting old.
I'm all for this design if somebody could code it to adapt the screen
resolution of the user. I have a wide-screen monitor I got huge whites
paces
MrC;460783 Wrote:
So, where's the Logitech logo? Apple's Logo is prominent: upper left.
Dell's is prominent: upper left. IBM's is prominent: upper left.
Sonos' is: prominent, upper left. Logitech's... is hidden under the
fold. :-)
I still think the site looks good.
But the Logitech
But the Logitech Squeezebox logo is top left
...and that's everything that counts, isn't it? :-)
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
I noticed that the SC 7.4 code is already targeted for general release
and only bug fixes are being admitted. Is the current test.sn targeted
to be released at the same time? If so, is the Remote Control function
going to be released as is or is there still room for some changes? I
hope that
hope that there still time to improve on the semi-transparent
currently-playing-track-info overlay that covers half of album art
While it's too late to change this for this release, what would you want
to see changed for the next release? Remove it? Make it opaque?
mherger;460655 Wrote:
hope that there still time to improve on the semi-transparent
currently-playing-track-info overlay that covers half of album art
While it's too late to change this for this release, what would you
want
to see changed for the next release? Remove it? Make it
JJZolx;460677 Wrote:
I don't really get this design. You're working within a small browser
window, so if you need more room to display text and artwork without
overlaying them, just make the window bigger. Also, the NP text being
overlayed is much larger than it needs to be.
The layout
JJZolx;455207 Wrote:
The Home page looks like it was drawn with crayons.
Thanks for being so understanding and diplomatic. Seeing that we're
actual human beings, and not just some faceless corporation, we really
appreciate that. ;)
One thing I should point out to you guys:
- For the first
mweldon;460778 Wrote:
As for having to scroll down:
http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of
EDIT: Having to side-scroll at 1024 screen-width is indeed a bug.
We'll work to fix that ASAP; the site width is supposed to be around 980
pixels. I think something is going
Yep, same here.
_I_ have to say that I like the new layout much, much better than the
old one.
The old one was very crowded and I never really found my way through
it.
The new one is light, looks good and is actually pretty simple to
navigate. I especially like the players overview.
There may be
mherger;456881 Wrote:
The 'Account Settings' and 'Change Password' forms don't use the same
styling as the rest of the site, where each setting name is in bold
text.
Good catch! Thanks!
The password change screen still needs the new styling and image submit
button.
--
JJZolx
Jim
A couple more minor styling issues:
The 'Account Settings' and 'Change Password' forms don't use the same
styling as the rest of the site, where each setting name is in bold
text.
There should be a little more space between the player 'Disconnect' and
'Delete' buttons. I also think the
The 'Account Settings' and 'Change Password' forms don't use the same
styling as the rest of the site, where each setting name is in bold
text.
Good catch! Thanks!
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
What's that weird fuzzy gray horizontal bar that runs through the tabbed
pages? I'm not talking about the thing in the nav column on the left.
It looks like some kind of background image.
+---+
|Filename: 2009-09-09_141755.jpg
Will the grayed out 'Disconnect' button become an active 'Connect'
button on players that aren't attached to SN?
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread:
What's that weird fuzzy gray horizontal bar that runs through the tabbed
It's obviously a weird fuzzy grey background.
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Will the grayed out 'Disconnect' button become an active 'Connect'
button on players that aren't attached to SN?
No. SN can't talk to SC in real time. It would take SC = 5 minutes to
receive the command.
___
beta mailing list
mherger;456701 Wrote:
What's that weird fuzzy gray horizontal bar that runs through the
tabbed
It's obviously a weird fuzzy grey background.
Thumbs down.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile:
Thumbs down.
You can't argue taste :-)
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
mherger;456706 Wrote:
Thumbs down.
You can't argue taste :-)
Says who? :-)
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread:
mherger;456706 Wrote:
You can't argue taste :-)
Jim can :P
--
funkstar
my collection:
*1*x squeezebox radio
*1*x squeezebox touch
*1*x squeezebox boom
*2*x controller, *1*x receiver
*2*x sb3 (sliver/black), *1*x sb2 wired (silver)
*1*x sb (black), *1*x slimp3 (with rear shield)
interested
I thought my monitor had developed a defect until I scrolled the page
and the smudge moved.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread:
JJZolx;456759 Wrote:
I thought my monitor had developed a defect until I scrolled the page
and the smudge moved.
guess this 'smudge' is trying to represent shiny metal.
Or maybe just a grey horizontal bar indeed :)
--
bluegaspode
One SB-Duet+Receiver. Server running on Linkstation NAS
mherger;42 Wrote:
You are going to be able to eventually identify Baby as a Squeezebox
Radio instead of a Controller, right?
Hmm... this should have been in place for a while now. In fact: my
Touches
and Babies show up as such (incl. icon). But if you've never actually
mherger;455268 Wrote:
2. The pages are set in a fixed width, but it's about 30-40 pixels
too
wide to fit on a 1024 pixel wide display.
That was a deliberate decision based on server stats.
Ick. I find myself using my netbook increasingly often, and very, very
few netbooks have screens
Schindler;455280 Wrote:
i even have to scrool up/down on my 24 wide monitor... ;-)
Me to on 1920*1080 screen resolution !
--
Mnyb
No it can NOT be controlled with iTunes
i even have to scrool up/down on my 24 wide monitor... ;-)
Maximze your browser window :-).
I must admit - it's too tall for me too. We'll see.
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Me to on 1920*1080 screen resolution !
Can't you flip it into portrait mode? Oh, hold on... then it's too wide.
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Ick. I find myself using my netbook increasingly often, and very, very
That's something I've mentioned too. Increased use of smaller screens. I
was surprised that a.) it didn't crash Safari on iPod Touch, and b.) the
animation on there was quite good too. It seems to be using some smart
Ouch... just tried Opera's fit to screen feature...
+---+
|Filename: matrix.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=8075|
There's a Matrix App ??
--
bonze
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - SqueezeCenter Version: 7.4 - 28143
3 x wireless SB3 + a Duet
bonze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6150
View this thread:
mherger;455287 Wrote:
Me to on 1920*1080 screen resolution !
Can't you flip it into portrait mode? Oh, hold on... then it's too
wide.
1080*1920 :) is that why all movies i have looks like small strip from
floor to roof must adjust my projector to...
zooming in FF can be used but it's to
Could not the app scroller be vertical and on one side with widescreen
monitors ?
--
Mnyb
No it can NOT be controlled with iTunes
Mnyb's Profile:
Maybe is just me, but the only reason I visit SN is to interact with the
player and view the info of the currently playing track. In this new
design the Remote Control appear to be an after-thought. If I try to
open it directly in the browser in full screen via
I haven't used Squeezenetwork since like a year (I have a local server
with Squeezecenter always on), but I think this looks better than the
previous design, and altough I agree that the remote control section
should take a better spot on the page layout, with the new Radio and
Touch products my
mherger;455286 Wrote:
i even have to scrool up/down on my 24 wide monitor... ;-)
Maximze your browser window :-).
I must admit - it's too tall for me too. We'll see.
I just tried Maximized in Safari on my MacBook Pro 1920x1200.
Scrolling is required. The irony is that its the Logitech
There's a Matrix App ??
On Opera only. Won't run on SliMP3.
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
You are going to be able to eventually identify Baby as a Squeezebox
Radio instead of a Controller, right?
Hmm... this should have been in place for a while now. In fact: my Touches
and Babies show up as such (incl. icon). But if you've never actually
connected to SN since that code was
1. The Home page looks like it was drawn with crayons. Everything is
gigantic. Logos, icons, fonts. A little too much white space also,
which combined with the large page header and the giant scrolling
service icons pushes the main page body down (and probably off for some
people) screen.
The
1. The Home page looks like it was drawn with crayons.
Nice opener! A model of constructive criticism as always.
-k
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Ben Sandee;455229 Wrote:
Hmm, what browser? Granted, I don't have a 1024-width screen
(1280x1024) but it looks great to me. I'll try it on my netbook and see
if it's usable at all.
It's a well known fact that wider screens make crayon drawings look
better ;)
--
Mark Miksis
I like the design and the functionality is great. It could just stand
to be tighter.
the only shade of green that hurts
That's awesome.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile:
Besides the little to large scrolling icons I think it's looking good.
Much better than the old design a quantum leap I say !, it's functions
is very well thought out too. I'm very pleased with it
If you want criticism, imho the design is slanted at presenting the
new exciting offers from our
2. The pages are set in a fixed width, but it's about 30-40 pixels too
wide to fit on a 1024 pixel wide display.
That was a deliberate decision based on server stats.
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
45 matches
Mail list logo
