> On May 16, 2023, at 15:12 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> Just wondering, why would you not want to auto-generate the cite key when
> adding?
If you have a master .bib file and create smaller ones as needed by
project/report/topic/etc, it makes sense that you'd want the same citekeys in
> On Mar 30, 2023, at 20:01 , David Craig wrote:
>
> What’s the recommended way to merge two bibliographies?
>
> I know I can drag all entries from one bibliography into another, but in this
> case BibDesk is happy to copy over duplicate entries, which then have to be
> removed by hand. Is
> On Jul 24, 2021, at 10:57 , Trevor Jenkins wrote:
>
> Anyone venture an answer as to what I have done wrong please.
Yeah, you didn't post the log here :).
___
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
On March 3, 2020 at 5:31 PM, FZiegler wrote:
That would explain me seeing the same BibDesk slowdown on a new machine running
Mojave -- but alas not the (BibDesk- and LS-unrelated) problems that started
this all for me *in Yosemite* (crashes for which the shop today said they found
no
On March 3, 2020 at 10:54 AM, FZiegler wrote:
On Mar 3, 2020, at 1:21 PM, Adam R. Maxwell via Bibdesk-users
wrote:
Huh. I speculate that 32 vs 64 is a red herring, but it may be taking a
different code path if you're linking against a different SDK. Either way, this
is an interesting
On March 3, 2020 at 10:02 AM, FZiegler wrote:
On Mar 3, 2020, at 11:26 AM, Adam R. Maxwell via Bibdesk-users
wrote:
Francois, do you have "Show icon preview" turned on in Finder's view options? I
wonder if there's a Quick Look plugin running to generate previews. That do
Francois, do you have "Show icon preview" turned on in Finder's view options? I
wonder if there's a Quick Look plugin running to generate previews. That doesn't make
sense with the sample, which shows it wasting a lot of time in a type lookup (recursive,
maybe?). It might be interesting to run
> On Mar 2, 2020, at 11:02 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> That is weird, I have no idea what is going on. It should not matter whether
> an app is in Applications, I see them even when they are in a temporary build
> location. Also the default app should nit be reset when the LS database is
> On Dec 26, 2019, at 00:42 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> What is important is that when you move either the papers or the database,
> either the relative paths, the absolute paths of the linked files, or the
> file objects remain the same. You broke all three of them.
Does it work to keep
Miklos,
See if you can right-click (control-click) on BibDesk and choose "Open" from
the context menu. If you have an administrator account, my understanding is that you can
still bypass the Gatekeeper notarization check. If not, you might be able to remove the
quarantine flag using
> On Jul 24, 2019, at 02:14 , David Nicholls wrote:
>
> This used not to happen. Macbook Pro 2018, OSX 10.14.16, Magic Mouse,
> Bibdesk 1.7.1
>
Ewww. There was a reason we used to put those zoom popups in scrollers (I mean,
back when the Mac had scrollers, and not a bunch of autohiding
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 10:20 , Carlito wrote:
>
> PLEASE STOP SEND MESSAGES I`M NOT INTEREST
Follow the link included at the bottom of every message. It will allow you to
unsubscribe, which no one else here can do for you.
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
On Jul 23, 2018, at 12:19 PM, "Craggs, Jason G."
wrote:
Question born of ignorance: is there any sort of cost to using that much
metadata in the cite key?
Minor cost in storage, dwarfed by the date-added/date-modified and bdsk-file
fields BibDesk adds. Generating it is a one-time cost,
On Jul 23, 2018, at 11:25 AM, John Clegg wrote:
Over the course of writing my dissertation I switched from one means of
generating reference information to another (bibdesk to papers). As a result I
use two large .bib files in my dissertation, an old one and new one. I treat
them both as
On Jul 23, 2018, at 11:10 AM, "Craggs, Jason G."
wrote:
@ Christian, thanks for the information about the cite key. Just so I know, If
it’s not a field, how then is it stored?
It's stored as a separate attribute of an item, unlike the normal "foo = bar"
fields, but that's only part of the
> On Jul 22, 2018, at 10:50 , John Clegg wrote:
>
> My problem is that at some point in the past I merged two large bibliography
> files and I now need to unmerge them. Specifically I need to delete all
> references that came from one of the two original files.
Can you use the "Item number"
> On Jul 11, 2018, at 01:30 , Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>
> I think the assignment should be in your Keyboard system preferences.
It's not a Service and doesn't have a menu item. AFAIK
the text system key binding is the only place to change
this. Then again, I've been using Mike Ferris'
17 matches
Mail list logo
