For an ISP, is there any risk in configuring BIND DNS as cache only and adding
customer's reverse mapping zones?
Any other possible implementations?
regards,
Sa
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from
On 12/15/2011 5:52 AM, Vbvbrj wrote:
On 15.12.2011 03:11, Danny Mayer wrote:
On 12/14/2011 2:35 PM, Vbvbrj wrote:
Bind 9.8.1 P1 installed in D:\bind9.
Config files and other zone files and log files in D:\bind_config
Service configuration: Path to executable
D:\bind9\bin\named.exe -c
On 12/14/2011 2:36 PM, Vbvbrj wrote:
Hello.
I've setup BIND to serve the requests to lan instead of Microsoft DNS by
first setting bind as a secondary dns server for Microsoft DNS, copy the
zones, and making the BIND the master. In order for domain member hosts
to update the records of the
On Thursday 15 December 2011 02:07:12 sasa sasa wrote:
For an ISP, is there any risk in configuring BIND DNS as cache
only and adding customer's reverse mapping zones? Any other
possible implementations?
To be precise, when you are serving any zones authoritatively, your
server is no longer
You need to be running Bind 9.7.2-P2 or higher for GSS-TSIG to work.
Create a user account in your AD. Then run:
ktpass -out name_of_your_keytab.keytab -princ DNS/domain.name@DOMAIN.NAME
-pass * -mapuser AD_user_you_created@domain.name
_
On 12/15/2011 11:43 AM, Vbvbrj wrote:
On 15.12.2011 15:39, Danny Mayer wrote:
Thanks for answering.
I want to keep all the files related to bind in one folder, not across
the system folder. And keeping the named.conf in the system32 folder may
be lost when the system is reinstalled and in a
Hello Bind ML,
i am trying to setup some blacklists foqr some users.
I have a file for every blacklist, example: blacaklistA blacklistB blacklistC.
I have to assign different combination of A B C to users.
I created dns bind view that, by matching source ip client, provide different
answer
To settle the question of are 2 nameservers required by the RFCs?, I'm
surprised you guys missed this text in RFC 1034, Section 4.1:
A given zone will be available from several name servers to insure
its availability in spite of host or communication link failure. By
administrative
On Dec 15 2011, Kevin Darcy wrote:
To settle the question of are 2 nameservers required by the RFCs?, I'm
surprised you guys missed this text in RFC 1034, Section 4.1:
A given zone will be available from several name servers to insure
its availability in spite of host or communication
Hello Bind ML,
i am trying to setup some blacklists foqr some users.
I have a file for every blacklist, example: blacaklistA blacklistB blacklistC.
I have to assign different combination of A B C to users.
I created dns bind view that, by matching source ip client, provide different
answer
Hello,
I have recently done a migration bind8 to bind9.
I have remarked that in my slave zones file, I did not have anymore some
interesting information I had with bind8.
These informations are comments on the last zone transfer.
Can anybody tell me if it is possible in BINDP to have the same
Please contact your MUA vendor and report that there printed-quotable
generation is broken. printed-quotable SHOULD NOT be escaping ;
and ,. printed-quotable should be doing the bare minimum of
trasformation as one of its design goals is for the result to be
readable by HUMANS. Un-necessary
12 matches
Mail list logo
